List Mgmt. 2019 Draft and Trade Hypotheticals Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Daniher would not have requested the trade Today if the Swans had not assured him a deal would be done considering He would have to go back there next year and play when he clearly does not want to be there. There will be posturing and pandering and pontificating for a solid 2 weeks with all the media s**t in the middle but its done. Guaranteed.
[/QUOTE]
Agreed. I wouldn't be at all surprised if both clubs had already come close to an agreement and that Joe held off announcing his move until he received the nod from one of the clubs.
 
Why do you even support the club? Seriously?

Every team has players on the list who suffer injuries and don't ever get to play a game of AFL or see their careers end. Every. One.

Isn't this the same medical team that managed to get Sam Reid on the field for 22 games this season? The same medical team that got Alex Johnson back on to an AFL field after multiple knee reconstructions and years out of the game?

Sad when you can be a forum moderator for a club about which you have nothing positive to say.
I find it equally sad watching people fawn all over the club blindly.

Don’t see the issue with holding the club to a high standard.

it’s remarkable to me that you’re giving the club credit for a bloke having 4 ACL reconstructions like that’s a feather in their cap. As for them getting kudos for a player playing 22 games it just goes to show how low the bar is set. Well done to the club on doing what they’re supposed to do.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Didn't realise people could see into the future and aalready know Daniher is cooked :rolleyes:

BF pessimists obviously have more info than the club...

Didn't realise people could see into the future and aalready know Daniher isn't cooked :rolleyes:

BF optimists obviously have more info than the club...
 
Fast forward to Round 8 2020.

Daniher is listed on the injury list as “indefinite”.

The media are describing it as a trade disaster.

The Bigfooty world is in meltdown. Our Board is in meltdown.

I’m still pretty cool with this trade.
I can picture it now

“Guys it’s fine; we won a flag 8 years ago”
 
My sense is that, if it actually does happen, it will be a while yet. I doubt there are many clubs clamouring for his signature so the club can probably afford to take care of other more pressing stuff first and sign him after the draft.
Hare and tortoise stuff.
 
My take on this trade and to an extent, draft period.

Sydney lose: Papley, Picks 9 & 25
Sydney gain: Daniher, Bennell, (Pick 5)

I think this wins the silly season as we’re retaining our first rounder (which the club has reportedly said they will not use...although that could be media drivel).
Don’t think we need to replace Papley, we have Menzel and Ronke for that role.

Not sure what’s going on with Jones but he could be replaced with the right mid.

Anyway, just spitballing atm
 
Chuckling over questions asked at the trade combine:

As explained by potential top-10 pick Brodie Kemp, Sydney had five toys and wanted him to pick one and explain why.
“(There was) a fake spider, big blue ball where you squeeze it, jelly, a puzzle and one of those slap bracelets,” he explained to foxfooty.com.au.
“I picked the big fluffy ball and it just looked really appealing.”

 
Chuckling over questions asked at the trade combine:

As explained by potential top-10 pick Brodie Kemp, Sydney had five toys and wanted him to pick one and explain why.
“(There was) a fake spider, big blue ball where you squeeze it, jelly, a puzzle and one of those slap bracelets,” he explained to foxfooty.com.au.
“I picked the big fluffy ball and it just looked really appealing.”


I wonder what is the reasoning behind that?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I wonder what is the reasoning behind that?
from the article
Adelaide, Gold Coast and Sydney were the three clubs highlighted by multiple draft prospects, as to the clubs who attempted to create havoc in the meeting rooms.
...
Some clubs are split on the process of asking ‘weird questions’.
One list manager declared the process of asking silly questions was “useless and a waste of time”, while a rival club’s psychologist gave an insight into the progress explaining it was done to “assess the cognitive side of things and to make players think on their feet”.
 
from the article
Adelaide, Gold Coast and Sydney were the three clubs highlighted by multiple draft prospects, as to the clubs who attempted to create havoc in the meeting rooms.
...
Some clubs are split on the process of asking ‘weird questions’.
One list manager declared the process of asking silly questions was “useless and a waste of time”, while a rival club’s psychologist gave an insight into the progress explaining it was done to “assess the cognitive side of things and to make players think on their feet”.

Oh fascinating.
 
Chuckling over questions asked at the trade combine:

As explained by potential top-10 pick Brodie Kemp, Sydney had five toys and wanted him to pick one and explain why.
“(There was) a fake spider, big blue ball where you squeeze it, jelly, a puzzle and one of those slap bracelets,” he explained to foxfooty.com.au.
“I picked the big fluffy ball and it just looked really appealing.”


AFL the last airbender.
 
I’ve said before and I’ll say it again, Tom Harley is a over trained media monkey. He just drops cliched vernacular that is meant to impress everyone, yet tells you absolutely nothing about what’s actually going on. He’s full of sh1t and is more interested in appeasing the masses around social inclusivity rather than getting this football team winning flags. He’s a fraud and he can piss off.
 
Is one reason/benefit to why the Swans would trade Daniher this year for picks as opposed to next year as a free agent.
In the case of a career ending injury,, As a free Agent we are committed to his salary for the duration of his contract,, As a traded player we're not?
 
Don’t think we need to replace Papley, we have Menzel and Ronke for that role.

:oops: Christ on a bike !

If that's the plan we'll be in the bottom four a few more years yet. So perhaps we can afford to give away our top pick this year, plenty more on the way !

Can we start in early on who we are getting for the number 1 pick next year discussion?
 
I’ve said before and I’ll say it again, Tom Harley is a over trained media monkey. He just drops cliched vernacular that is meant to impress everyone, yet tells you absolutely nothing about what’s actually going on. He’s full of sh1t and is more interested in appeasing the masses around social inclusivity rather than getting this football team winning flags. He’s a fraud and he can p**s off.
Nice...you must get great gratification from judging a book by its cover?
 
:oops: Christ on a bike !

If that's the plan we'll be in the bottom four a few more years yet. So perhaps we can afford to give away our top pick this year, plenty more on the way !

Can we start in early on who we are getting for the number 1 pick next year discussion?
Yeah sure, who are we picking and how we’ll do they go at AFL level?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top