List Mgmt. 2019 Trade Thread - Part V

Remove this Banner Ad

Everyone deserves one or two chances when they are young, but this guy has a list as long as your arm. An particularly now because we have lads like Hill & Parker we wont need a rotten egg to spoil what they will acheive.

Regardless of the fitness of Bennell, its an absolute NO from me. No player is worth that much trouble and the club that takes him on will soon discover that.

I'm disappointed the club are even looking, it's no different to the Cousins scenario.

Maybe Hill has vouched for Harley that he’s got his act together & it’s only his calf that’s the issue?

Throw him under Uncle Paddy’s wing & cross all your fingers and toes.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Log in to remove this ad.

i'd take literally every player in that 9 (removing Moore from the discussion) ahead of paddy right now. pickett excluded, due to injury.

Of course you would, they’re all still playing footy.

At the time it was either Paddy or Fatso the Wombat... and we haven’t really miss the 2nd coming of Judd by choosing Paddy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I'll bet some had the same opinion of Marlon Pickett when he was that age.

Have some faith in the club on this one.
I'm not saying I'd want him, but it won't cost us anything.

there are some things bigger than football. it has nothing to do with weather or not the club thinks its a good recruitment. it's not a football issue.

i am capable of making my own decisions on what is acceptable behaviour. i don't need the club to decide that for me. because the club employs him doesn't mean i then just accept it.

i'm not supporting a club employing someone of his character. sorry but if that happens, i'm out.

the bloke is an absolute **** wit.

if you want your football club to have someone like in that and all the shit that comes with it. then go for it. i aint having my kids associated with that shit.
 
Maybe Hill has vouched for Harley that he’s got his act together & it’s only his calf that’s the issue?

Throw him under Uncle Paddy’s wing & cross all your fingers and toes.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

just like essendon and everyone there vouched for Lovett.

Bennell has absolutely no place in a club that is rebuilding its image as an inclusive club that's family orientated.

i'm not going to games here with my kids wondering if the bikies are going to rock up to pay Harley a visit like what happened at a pre-season game here in MARCH OF THIS YEAR!!!!

geeze what a difference 7 months makes on a bloke with over 10 years of history!
 
there are some things bigger than football. it has nothing to do with weather or not the club thinks its a good recruitment. it's not a football issue.

i am capable of making my own decisions on what is acceptable behaviour. i don't need the club to decide that for me. because the club employs him doesn't mean i then just accept it.

i'm not supporting a club employing someone of his character. sorry but if that happens, i'm out.

the bloke is an absolute fu** wit.

if you want your football club to have someone like in that and all the shit that comes with it. then go for it. i aint having my kids associated with that shit.
St I know what your saying but one idiot in the club really will not destroy the club and would be out the door if standards are not met.
Take it easy , the word has it he will be playing for Melbourne.
 
If he is any good then why not. Does 6 weeks playing mid make you a mid though? He has played mostly forward except the final 6 weeks of the season from what I have read. If that’s the case, Sam Gray is more of a mid then Allen.


Matt Allen, not Oscar, they won't let Oscar go. Matt Allen was on SEN today saying he'd been forced out because of Kelly coming, says he's an inside mid. He was emergency on a lot of games over the last couple of years. Partington is also another worth looking at. Both good back up mid stocks.
 
Would love us to take Bennel. Moneyball player with a huge upside but a risk factor. His made a lot of mistakes, but people change. Lyon vouches for him. If his calves come up ok on the medical then worth a rookie spot for me. Get it done boys

Lyon vouches for him sounds an awful lot like Hird vouching for Lovett

that went well
 
Does everyone remember what happened last time we opted to trade an indigenous speedster with great skills but a questionable background?
Sheedy and Hird recommend Harley?
If so, I'm dafaq out!
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

St I know what your saying but one idiot in the club really will not destroy the club and would be out the door if standards are not met.
Take it easy , the word has it he will be playing for Melbourne.

he won't destroy the club. club's survive literally everything these days. i mean look at hird/dank and essendon. they're still standing. lovett didn't kill our club.

i just won't be involved with someone like that at our club. not worth it.
 
Matt Allen, not Oscar, they won't let Oscar go. Matt Allen was on SEN today saying he'd been forced out because of Kelly coming, says he's an inside mid. He was emergency on a lot of games over the last couple of years. Partington is also another worth looking at. Both good back up mid stocks.
I am talking about Matt also. Read an article today about him moving to the midfield for the last 6 weeks of the season at WAFL level. Play mostly forward/utility most of his career it said.
If he showed more promise than his delisting suggests than it would be a better option than a late draft pick. Likewise Partington and Hibberd.
 
Serious question and not having a go at anyone but what has Bennell actually done that we know of other than racking that line back in the day? I know he's got a bad reputation but how much is innuendo and how much is fact?

I saw it posted that he has bikie associates with I genuinely dislike but then again Gardi had some colourful mates and he fitted in ok.

Not being a smart arse, am genuinely interested coz I haven't really taken that much interest in him
 
Lyon vouches for him sounds an awful lot like Hird vouching for Lovett

that went well
Could very well go the same way, but he wouldnt really cost us anything but a list spot for 1 year if we take him as a rookie. It seems we are taking a risk with a couple of list spots every year, which i like as a strategy. Weve lost Stuv, Paddy, Lewy, Billy, Armo, Rowe who didnt really play at all last year and replaced them with Ryder, Hill, Jones, Butler and Howard, which means we basically have an extra 5 players who either definitely will be or could be a decent choice in our best 22.

What im trying to say, it we took Bennel and it didnt work out it wouldnt effect our depth. If he gets his act together we have a gun player for nothing. Winning🤩🤩
 
Could very well go the same way, but he wouldnt really cost us anything but a list spot for 1 year if we take him as a rookie. It seems we are taking a risk with a couple of list spots every year, which i like as a strategy. Weve lost Stuv, Paddy, Lewy, Billy, Armo, Rowe who didnt really play at all last year and replaced them with Ryder, Hill, Jones, Butler and Howard, which means we basically have an extra 5 players who either definitely will be or could be a decent choice in our best 22.

What im trying to say, it we took Bennel and it didnt work out it wouldnt effect our depth. If he gets his act together we have a gun player for nothing. Winning🤩🤩

Could cost us a fortune in bad publicity just as we are starting to rise again hopefully.
Who could forget the Lovett saga? And the Carlisle saga? And the rumours about Hanners?
I honestly think he’s the very last player we need to add to our list.
 
Could very well go the same way, but he wouldnt really cost us anything but a list spot for 1 year if we take him as a rookie. It seems we are taking a risk with a couple of list spots every year, which i like as a strategy. Weve lost Stuv, Paddy, Lewy, Billy, Armo, Rowe who didnt really play at all last year and replaced them with Ryder, Hill, Jones, Butler and Howard, which means we basically have an extra 5 players who either definitely will be or could be a decent choice in our best 22.

What im trying to say, it we took Bennel and it didnt work out it wouldnt effect our depth. If he gets his act together we have a gun player for nothing. Winning🤩🤩


Yeah, he looks ike the kind of player we'd offer overs for. Get him and dump him if he plays up.
 
Could cost us a fortune in bad publicity just as we are starting to rise again hopefully.
Who could forget the Lovett saga? And the Carlisle saga? And the rumours about Hanners?
I honestly think he’s the very last player we need to add to our list.


It's better to be embarrassing than a non entity. We are irrelevant these days, might as well get the disco back to Linton Street.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2019 Trade Thread - Part V

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top