Mowman
Brownlow Medallist
- May 19, 2013
- 23,125
- 83,781
I will back the club surely they know what is best on thisPlayer G isn't better than player M. Player G is 32 years of age. Player M is 23 with huge improvement where as player G has very much most likely reached his best and is on the way down. We need a ruckman next year who can replace player M if injured. We don't need 2 ruckmen in the one side. We have marking forwards in player B and player M and another that will certainly be played baring injury in player K. There is no place in the side for player G. And if he is as good as you think player G isn't coming to us to play seconds and only a moron would want player M as back up when he is probably the most promising big man in the game.
The best player as back up is either a younger kid with improvement or an older guy who can pinch hit when needed. It is never an old first ruck. Anyway id be sure North see his value and keep him. Draper and an older ruck should be our options.