Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
No. Like Others have said there should be a good KPF prospect around that mark. KPF is our biggest hole but we also need an inside beast and probably another KPD tooI was pretty down on us pre-season but I reckon I have higher hopes than a lot of you guys now. Just looking at our fixture which is very kind, unless we get slaughtered by injuries I see us finishing on the fringes of the 8. There's a lot of middling teams out there which I think we can cover. So we could be looking at a Pick 8, 9 or 10. In that case would you be comfortable involving a future first to trade up to secure a key forward?
He'll be in the AFL Academy, along with the rest of the country's most highly rated juniors, but not a member of our NGA (Next Generation Academy).is tsatsas part of a Academy squad
Happy to trade a future first if it got us a second top 10 pick this yearI was pretty down on us pre-season but I reckon I have higher hopes than a lot of you guys now. Just looking at our fixture which is very kind, unless we get slaughtered by injuries I see us finishing on the fringes of the 8. There's a lot of middling teams out there which I think we can cover. So we could be looking at a Pick 8, 9 or 10. In that case would you be comfortable involving a future first to trade up to secure a key forward?
By the end of the year they'll have to make a decision about whether to go for it with the current group and look to immediately fill holes, or whether to be patient and draft best available, as there will be holes everywhere before you'd realistically expect draftees to fill current holes.We have some guns on our list who will be too old when a KPF draftee is ready to impact in 3-4 years.
So getting an established KPF makes more sense IMO.
Otherwise we’ll have a fwd in 3-4years with holes all over the field because our guns have retired or past it.
Not sure we can develop the next, lot of AA’s like Howe, Moore, JDG, Sidey, Pendles, Grundy, Adams in that time.
That sort of mindset is why our key position stocks are so poor currentlyWe have some guns on our list who will be too old when a KPF draftee is ready to impact in 3-4 years.
So getting an established KPF makes more sense IMO.
Otherwise we’ll have a fwd in 3-4years with holes all over the field because our guns have retired or past it.
Not sure we can develop the next, lot of AA’s like Howe, Moore, JDG, Sidey, Pendles, Grundy, Adams in that time.
Not disagreeing just think an established KPF is a better option - for the reasons I mentioned and because they’re a known quantity, as opposed to the hit and miss of the draft for KPF.That sort of mindset is why our key position stocks are so poor currently
Need to start fixing it now
I agree, but where are we getting this established forward from?Not disagreeing just think an established KPF is a better option - for the reasons I mentioned and because they’re a known quantity, as opposed to the hit and miss of the draft for KPF.
Not disagreeing just think an established KPF is a better option - for the reasons I mentioned and because they’re a known quantity, as opposed to the hit and miss of the draft for KPF.
Tom Scully just kicked another 7 goals last night
Along with 16 disposals. 15 of those were kicks.
Has kicked 22 goals in 4 games. Averages 5.5 a game
Seems to be a lot of KPF forward prospects so far. Which means we will somehow draft a flanker
Which established KPF? There aren't many options around.
Come on, you know our draft team. There’s no chance they’ll draft a key position player the excuse will be that they were picking the next best available player and that was a mid of average size, no speed or skill but had some good numbers in the combine.
A pick around that area should be enough to secure a decent key forward in this draft. Lemmey and Keeler aren’t the only two highly rated talls.
And tbh, trading an extra first to secure a draft prospect is a dangerous strategy. Schache was pick 2, and in the same draft McKay went at 10 and Curnow at 12.
I was pretty down on us pre-season but I reckon I have higher hopes than a lot of you guys now. Just looking at our fixture which is very kind, unless we get slaughtered by injuries I see us finishing on the fringes of the 8. There's a lot of middling teams out there which I think we can cover. So we could be looking at a Pick 8, 9 or 10. In that case would you be comfortable involving a future first to trade up to secure a key forward?
North Adelaide - SANFL
sanfl.com.au
Who is our draft team that has a track record of doing this?
Sure, but our list management seems to have moved onto a totally different philosophy than Hine.Probably the one who hasn't spent a first rounder on a non FS KPF since Ben Reid in 06.