List Mgmt. 2022 Trade & List Management Thread III

[giantroo]

Spoiler: Confirmed Trades

Spoiler: 2022 Draft Pick Order

AFL Draft - AFL.com.au

Australian Football League. All the latest AFL news, video, results and information

www.afl.com.au

Spoiler: 2023 Draft Pick Order

Spoiler: Key dates

AFL Trade Period Key Dates - AFL.com.au

When does Free Agency begin? How long does the Trade Period go for? Find out on AFL.com.au.

www.afl.com.au

Key Dates:

Friday 07 October at 5.00pm
Close of AFL Restricted Free Agency Offer and Unrestricted Free Agency Period.

Monday 10 October
NAB AFL Draft Nominations open (9am)
AFL Restricted Free Agency Matching Offer 3 Day Period Ends (5pm)

Wednesday 12 October at 7.30pm
AFL Trade Period closes – players and selections


Thursday 03 November at 9.00am
AFL Delisted Player Free Agency Period (1) commences

Wednesday 09 November at 5.00pm

AFL Delisted Player Free Agency Period (1) closes

Friday 11 November at 9.00am

AFL Delisted Player Free Agency Period (2) commences

Tuesday 15 November by 5.00pm

AFL Delisted Player Free Agency Period (2) closes
AFL Trade Period closes – selections only

Monday 21 November by 3.00pm

NAB AFL Draft Nominations close

Monday 28 November at 7.10pm

2022 NAB AFL Draft Round One (Venue TBC)

Father/Son, Academy & NGA and Players Bidding opens.

Tuesday 29 November

AFL Trade Period – selections only (5.45pm to 6.30pm)

2022 NAB AFL National Draft Round two until completion (7pm)

Rookie Upgrade Period opens (10pm)

AFL Delisted Player Free Agency Period (3) commences (10pm)

Rookie Upgrade Period closes (11pm)

AFL Delisted Player Free Agency Period (3) closes (11pm)

Wednesday 30 November

NAB AFL Pre-Season Draft (3pm, online)
NAB AFL Rookie Draft (3.20pm, online)

Thursday 01 December by 4.00pm

Final AFL Club List Lodgement

 

[My Left Foote]

Rival clubs have been made aware of North Melbourne’s openness to trading Pick 3 in a deal that would see the Roos appropriately compensated.

Trades haven’t stopped: The AFL clubs tipped to feature heavily in crucial draft pick swap period

Trades haven’t stopped: The AFL clubs set to feature heavily in pick swap period

www.foxsports.com.au

So having read the article what they’re saying is all clubs are open to trading picks and moving up the order or shuffling back. Investigative journalism at its finest. Stay tuned for their next article on how every club would like to win a premiership.

 

[justroyal]

That’s the problem with You Tube highlights, everyone’s getting so excited because he’s quick but they don’t see his deficiencies until of course when we draft him and they’ll be whinging every week that opposition players run off him because he doesn’t run both ways.

Ok I’m just at pains keeping up with what we should go for. The idea for north drafting a top 5 inside mid and an outside mid sounds too good to be true. Almost like we’re gws of 2010’s.

But it sounds like the medium forward in Sheezel and the inside mid in Wardlaw is the way to go?

In terms of developing. Inside mids we’ve got: Jy, LDU, Willphil, Powell.

Outside: Scott, Goater?, Taylor?

Small forwards: Curtis, Ford

It’s a tough one. In terms of needs analysis. You’d almost says Sheezel and Tsatas makes sense. But we can never have enough mids who can show some goal scoring nous, which Wardlaw shows. This is ****ed.

Granted. GWS could pick any of them an it would butcher the whole thing.

Edit: when the **** did the word change ‘cactus’ become a thing?

 

[Mr Lloyd Christmas]

If Dan Hannebery gets another contract well...........as bizarre as AFL is.it could happen.

 

[My Left Foote]

Ok I’m just at pains keeping up with what we should go for. The idea for north drafting a top 5 inside mid and an outside mid sounds too good to be true. Almost like we’re gws of 2010’s.

But it sounds like the medium forward in Sheezel and the inside mid in Wardlaw is the way to go?

In terms of developing. Inside mids we’ve got: Jy, LDU, Willphil, Powell.

Outside: Scott, Goater?, Taylor?

Small forwards: Curtis, Ford

It’s a tough one. In terms of needs analysis. You’d almost says Sheezel and Tsatas makes sense. But we can never have enough mids who can show some goal scoring nous, which Wardlaw shows. This is cactus.

Granted. GWS could pick any of them an it would butcher the whole thing.

Edit: when the * did the word change ‘cactus’ become a thing?

I think we just have to go best available with 2 and 3 and for me that’s Sheezel and Wardlaw by a fair margin.

I missed the memo on cactus so I’m going to stick with * I like the duality of it because we can say that * are * with Brad Scott as coach.

 

[The acurate one]

Aside from Wardlaw them others may just be shitmen.

Think about it .

Maybe Rawlings has developed the shitmen radar.

We don’t need a mid sized fwd any more than we need another Bailey Scott

8

Bailey Scott

Age

24

Ht

186cm

Wt

77kg

Pos.

D/M

Career

Season

Last 5

D

10.6

3star

K

5.8

2star

HB

4.9

4star

M

3.1

3star

T

1.5

3star

MG

155.6

2star

D

8.0

2star

K

5.0

2star

HB

3.0

2star

M

2.5

3star

T

1.8

3star

MG

114.8

2star

D

11.8

3star

K

6.0

3star

HB

5.8

4star

M

3.6

4star

T

1.2

3star

MG

171.6

3star

.


Interesting times I’d suggest.

Oh well as we say

 

[shinboner magic]

So in one thread ppl are losing their shit that we may trade pick 3.
In another thread ppl are losing their shit we won’t pick sheezel/ wardlaw combo

I thought supporting a sports team was meant to be fun

 

[JGreezy]

I said this in the draft thread but if we arent excited by Wardlaw (I am, but whatever) and we want to take Tsatas to fill a need on the wing then I would prefer Hollands and the Saints F1.

I rank Tsatas higher, but every draft pick is a roll of the dice. I have Tsatas 5th in this draft and I have Hollands 7th.

That Saints F1 could be ****ing gold.

Having said that, just give me Wardlaw and Sheezel.

 

[Sillygit]

So in one thread ppl are losing their s**t that we may trade pick 3.
In another thread ppl are losing their s**t we won’t pick sheezel/ wardlaw combo

I thought supporting a sports team was meant to be fun

Who's having fun? This hasnt ever been fun!

 

[hsquid]

So in one thread ppl are losing their s**t that we may trade pick 3.
In another thread ppl are losing their s**t we won’t pick sheezel/ wardlaw combo

I thought supporting a sports team was meant to be fun

To cover all bases I'm going to lose my s**t if we don't get Wardlaw, Sheezel, Tsatas and St. Kilda's future first.

 

[4cunningTonneTruck]

I said this in the draft thread but if we arent excited by Wardlaw (I am, but whatever) and we want to take Tsatas to fill a need on the wing then I would prefer Hollands and the Saints F1.

I rank Tsatas higher, but every draft pick is a roll of the dice. I have Tsatas 5th in this draft and I have Hollands 7th.

That Saints F1 could be ******* gold.

Having said that, just give me Wardlaw and Sheezel.

Yeah if we want a pure wingman I rate Hollands highrr

 

[Mr Lloyd Christmas]

Damn this is a mess and I haven't even contributed to it.

 

[Friday Night Lights]

Markov = The Polov

 

[Agenda 21]

To cover all bases I'm going to lose my s**t if we don't get Wardlaw, Sheezel, Tsatas and St. Kilda's first.

I'm still coming to terms with Stephen Patterson trying to scam free shit, at Maccas. On a road trip, mind you.

 

[Mr Lloyd Christmas]

Xerri contracted 2034.

Cant mark. Can't kick. Can't handball.

Plays footy like a Driver is required on the green not a Putter.

Has no idea.

 

[Agenda 21]

Xerri contracted 2034.

Cant mark. Can't kick. Can't handball.

Plays footy like a Driver is required on the green not a Putter.

Has no idea.

You act like every team has had champion backup ruckmen, over the last 30 years. Mark Blake won a flag, as did Aaron Keating. Ivan Soldo, Mark Seaby, Mike Pyke, as well. Didn't Stephen Doyle also play in a GF with Sydney? X might be this, but he might be better. Who knows?

What are you expecting, out of X?

CCJ & X will hopefully form a long term ruck partnership, let's just see.

He's 23, had a fair few coaches, rucks take a lot longer to develop...and he's had some fairly significant injuries, for a big fella.

I like a ruck that has a bit of campaigner about him, to be honest. Let's see the oppo mids with sh*t running down their legs, around stoppages.

 

[Heaps of fun]

I've heard we're trading pick 3 to Essendon for pick 4. Yep, that's the whole trade. It's classic Brady and I feel sick about it.

 

[roos 10]

I've heard we're trading pick 3 to Essendon for pick 4. Yep, that's the whole trade. It's classic Brady and I feel sick about it.

22 aswell and future 2nd

 

[Agenda 21]

I've heard we're trading pick 3 to Essendon for pick 4. Yep, that's the whole trade. It's classic Brady and I feel sick about it.

Does that mean it will be known as pick ****, instead of 4?

 

[Le Grille]

Don’t we get after the trade period that “appropriately compensated” means what it says now? Door is open but the offer would have to be very good.

In my defence it is subjective don’t forget we have effectively downgraded two pick 1s for this , I’m concerned further trade will dilute the value further. The top
picks aren’t worth a collection of ok picks

 

[tazaa]

Let me be clear KC, I don’t rate any of them bar Crowden and to a lesser extent Stocker. I just know that the rookie spots are being used for sh**men so hoping we get the semi decent ones.

Brother we can’t pick many of those DFA’s as rookies because we have Mahony and Spicer to add to those spots plus potentially more.
There may be room for literally one

 

[BlueandWhiteinmyBlood]

22 aswell and future 2nd

That’s not toooo bad.

 

[Shinboner1]

22 aswell and future 2nd

We'd have to open up another pick this year to make it worthwhile imo

 

[roos 10]

We'd have to open up another pick this year to make it worthwhile imo

Then trade 22,23 for pick10 off Carlton they happy to drop back for two good picks

 

[Only Forwards]

I've heard we're trading pick 3 to Essendon for pick 4. Yep, that's the whole trade. It's classic Brady and I feel sick about it.

What the f*** is the point of a straight swap for a single position?

There’d have to be more to it.

22 aswell and future 2nd

So:
Out - 3
In - 4, 22, f2

Seems like a decent return for moving back 1 spot.

 

[Shinboner1]

Then trade 22,23 for pick10 off Carlton they happy to drop back for two good picks

Big If