List Mgmt. 2022 Trade & List Management Thread III

[giantroo]

Spoiler: Confirmed Trades

Spoiler: 2022 Draft Pick Order

AFL Draft - AFL.com.au

Australian Football League. All the latest AFL news, video, results and information

www.afl.com.au

Spoiler: 2023 Draft Pick Order

Spoiler: Key dates

AFL Trade Period Key Dates - AFL.com.au

When does Free Agency begin? How long does the Trade Period go for? Find out on AFL.com.au.

www.afl.com.au

Key Dates:

Friday 07 October at 5.00pm
Close of AFL Restricted Free Agency Offer and Unrestricted Free Agency Period.

Monday 10 October
NAB AFL Draft Nominations open (9am)
AFL Restricted Free Agency Matching Offer 3 Day Period Ends (5pm)

Wednesday 12 October at 7.30pm
AFL Trade Period closes – players and selections


Thursday 03 November at 9.00am
AFL Delisted Player Free Agency Period (1) commences

Wednesday 09 November at 5.00pm

AFL Delisted Player Free Agency Period (1) closes

Friday 11 November at 9.00am

AFL Delisted Player Free Agency Period (2) commences

Tuesday 15 November by 5.00pm

AFL Delisted Player Free Agency Period (2) closes
AFL Trade Period closes – selections only

Monday 21 November by 3.00pm

NAB AFL Draft Nominations close

Monday 28 November at 7.10pm

2022 NAB AFL Draft Round One (Venue TBC)

Father/Son, Academy & NGA and Players Bidding opens.

Tuesday 29 November

AFL Trade Period – selections only (5.45pm to 6.30pm)

2022 NAB AFL National Draft Round two until completion (7pm)

Rookie Upgrade Period opens (10pm)

AFL Delisted Player Free Agency Period (3) commences (10pm)

Rookie Upgrade Period closes (11pm)

AFL Delisted Player Free Agency Period (3) closes (11pm)

Wednesday 30 November

NAB AFL Pre-Season Draft (3pm, online)
NAB AFL Rookie Draft (3.20pm, online)

Thursday 01 December by 4.00pm

Final AFL Club List Lodgement

 

[desie]

I lied. I'm not really ITK. I just wanted to feel important.

So we’re building the fence after we trade pick 3 for pick 4?

 

[rickety]

So we’re building the fence after we trade pick 3 for pick 4?

I hope we shut the bloomin gate after that, might stop his Royal Rawlingship from sinking #2 into #7 just for the lols

 

[Farthers]

Swans thank Ronke, Naismith and Bell

The Sydney Swans have made three further list changes ahead of the 2023 season, informing Sam Naismith, James Bell, and Ben Ronke they will not be offered new contracts for next year.

www.sydneyswans.com.au

Ronke, Naismith and Bell delisted.

 

[jay317]

Ronke and Bell worth a look?

 

[The acurate one]

Ronke and Bell worth a look?

Ronke's= the two

 

[The Nostradamus]

Ronke and Bell worth a look?

ronke yes bell no

 

[The acurate one]

ronke yes bell no

Ronke no Bell hell no

 

[Shinboner1]

ronke yes bell no

Yeah nah. Had a good first season then fell off hard

 

[krakouers]

I lied. I'm not really ITK. I just wanted to feel important.

Aww man... i really wanted to know more information about this fence

 

[Twangler]

I reckon Ronke would be worth a punt as a rookie for a couple of years - expected output would surely already pass that of the likes of ziebell, spicer, Mahoney and Lazzaro in the forward half

 

[brooksnk]

From what I gather, Essendon will be open to trading out 23 for our 40 and 43 now that the Davey kids are nominated.

Sounds good, except for the rumours floating around of swapping our 3 for Essendon's 4.

So perhaps the deal to expect will be:

3, 40, 43 <> 4, 23

Surely we can get the deal done without the 3 <> 4 swap?

 

[The Nostradamus]

From what I gather, Essendon will be open to trading out 23 for our 40 and 43 now that the Davey kids are nominated.

Sounds good, except for the rumours floating around of swapping our 3 for Essendon's 4.

So perhaps the deal to expect will be:

3, 40, 43 <> 4, 23

Surely we can get the deal done without the 3 <> 4 swap?

You mean 22

We already have 23

So that would give us 2,4,22,23 and cooper

5 picks which would require us to delist 1 player to rookie list

 

[The Filth Wizard]

From what I gather, Essendon will be open to trading out 23 for our 40 and 43 now that the Davey kids are nominated.

Sounds good, except for the rumours floating around of swapping our 3 for Essendon's 4.

So perhaps the deal to expect will be:

3, 40, 43 <> 4, 23

Surely we can get the deal done without the 3 <> 4 swap?

We’re not trading out 3 unless we get into next years first round. And if they want to get into 3 then it can only be to beat us to the player we want so they can pay up a lot more than a slightly disjointed pick swap.

 

[brooksnk]

You mean 22

We already have 23

So that would give us 2,4,22,23 and cooper

5 picks which would require us to delist 1 player to rookie list

Unless of course we can then dangle 22 and 23 to get another 1st rounder next year...

But then can we even still pick Cooper? or will just go into deficit next year? (not up to speed on what impact that has on our 2023 hand).

 

[Roos1991]

View attachment 1545072

Faaaaaaaark

 

[Shinboner1]

From what I gather, Essendon will be open to trading out 23 for our 40 and 43 now that the Davey kids are nominated.

Sounds good, except for the rumours floating around of swapping our 3 for Essendon's 4.

So perhaps the deal to expect will be:

3, 40, 43 <> 4, 23

Surely we can get the deal done without the 3 <> 4 swap?

That's so shit for us. Lump them with the 2 picks in the 20s and be done with it.

 

[Masked Avenger]

From what I gather, Essendon will be open to trading out 23 for our 40 and 43 now that the Davey kids are nominated.

Sounds good, except for the rumours floating around of swapping our 3 for Essendon's 4.

So perhaps the deal to expect will be:

3, 40, 43 <> 4, 23

Surely we can get the deal done without the 3 <> 4 swap?

Why in Zuess' butt hole would we give one of our mortal enemies access to a top 4 talent in Sheezel or Wardlaw for a pickswap involving a player ultimately outside that talent bracket. Plain insanity.

 

[buttox]

Unless of course we can then dangle 22 and 23 to get another 1st rounder next year...

But then can we even still pick Cooper? or will just go into deficit next year? (not up to speed on what impact that has on our 2023 hand).

Our 2023 pick goes backwards.
If Cooper is bid on in the second round our second rounder goes backwards next year.
As we don't have a second rounder it applies to our third rounder.
Very little penalty imo. Not much to risk.

 

[brooksnk]

Why in Zuess' butt hole would we give one of our mortal enemies access to a top 4 talent in Sheezel or Wardlaw for a pickswap involving a player ultimately outside that talent bracket. Plain insanity.

I agree - I'm just trying to place the rumour in something theoretically viable

- rather than the 'good faith' bait of a straight swap of 3 and 4.

But then again...with Rawling's at the helm...

 

[kool kangas]

l think we are in a very happy place atm with our picks but if we can get something closer with our picks 40 and 43 then so be it but NOT at the price of letting our pick #3 go........

 

[FootySmartSimpson]

From what I gather, Essendon will be open to trading out 23 for our 40 and 43 now that the Davey kids are nominated.

Sounds good, except for the rumours floating around of swapping our 3 for Essendon's 4.

So perhaps the deal to expect will be:

3, 40, 43 <> 4, 23

Surely we can get the deal done without the 3 <> 4 swap?

If Rawlings knows, and I mean knows for certain who Essendon will pick and it is not our guy, it makes no difference.

The mid-20s pick could mean 2 KPPs decent come in with Cooper and the top 5s (provided we have another delistee).

 

[buttox]

If Rawlings knows, and I mean knows for certain who Essendon will pick and it is not our guy, it makes no difference.

The mid-20s pick could mean 2 KPPs decent come in with Cooper and the top 5s (provided we have another delistee).

I'm not sure why * would do the trade if it was for someone we are not taking anyway.
No point. It won't happen.
GWS traded with us as they thought us or WC would take Cadman. Not the same scenario really.

 

[FootySmartSimpson]

I'm not sure why * would do the trade if it was for someone we are not taking anyway.
No point. It won't happen.
GWS traded with us as they thought us or WC would take Cadman. Not the same scenario really.

* may want Tsatas. We may not. In this scenario it works.

 

[DarkPhoenix]

I heard we might be swapping pick 2 for pick 3 with nothing going back.

 

[Masked Avenger]

If Rawlings knows, and I mean knows for certain who Essendon will pick and it is not our guy, it makes no difference.

The mid-20s pick could mean 2 KPPs decent come in with Cooper and the top 5s (provided we have another delistee).

We can assume it's not Tsatsas - because if it was they'd get him at 5 without spending a penny. It will be either Sheezel or Wardlaw - probably the latter.