Game Day 2022 Trade Period Match Thread

Have you installed a Rheem or felt the loving embrace of Continental Tyres safely guide your trip?

  • Having a shower in my Rheem right now

    Votes: 22 18.0%
  • No, what a stupid poll

    Votes: 13 10.7%
  • YOU DONT KNOW ME

    Votes: 22 18.0%
  • Luke Jackson

    Votes: 65 53.3%

  • Total voters
    122

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
deal that fell over below


PROPOSED MEGA DEAL DETAILS


NORTH MELBOURNE
Trade out:
Jason Horne-Francis, pick No.1, 2023 third-round pick (tied to Fremantle)
Trade in: Picks No.2, 3, 33, 53, 2023 future first-round pick (tied to Port Adelaide)


PORT ADELAIDE
Trade out:
Picks No.8, 33, 43, 53, 2023 first-round pick
Trade in: Jason Horne-Francis, Junior Rioli, pick No.36


WEST COAST
Trade out:
Junior Rioli, picks No.2, 40
Trade in: Picks No.8, 12, 2023 second-round pick (tied to Port Adelaide), 2023 third-round pick (tied to Fremantle)


GREATER WESTERN SYDNEY
Trade out:
Picks No.3, 12
Trade in: Pick No.1

BRISBANE
Trade out:
Pick No.36
Trade in: Jack Gunston, pick No.43


HAWTHORN
Trade in:
Pick No.40
Trade out: Jack Gunsto
This is missing the Port F2.

I don’t understand how the clubs could get so far into the deal, which did involve 6 clubs, before seeking clarification with AFL first.

What a waste of 6 clubs time, when the rules were already in place.
 
If we trade our F1 for Jackson and get the Bulldogs F1 for Lobb surely we keep it? The Dogs limped into the 8 this year and their B&F winner wants out. That could easily end up being a top ten pick in 2023.
What if it was Brisbane's via the Dogs?
 
This is missing the Port F2.

I don’t understand how the clubs could get so far into the deal, which did involve 6 clubs, before seeking clarification with AFL first.

What a waste of 6 clubs time, when the rules were already in place.
If that's how it's looking, that can still get done, just need to find a player they can trade out for a F2 or cut Rioli out of it
 

Log in to remove this ad.

How can a pick tied to Freo be in the trade but we aren’t ?

I mean we may not be having a great trade week but throwing picks into other teams trades Willy Nilly seems like a stretch even for us
LOL.
It’s the North future 3rd that came from us.

I saw that too and did a triple take of WTF!
 
How can a pick tied to Freo be in the trade but we aren’t ?

I mean we may not be having a great trade week but throwing picks into other teams trades Willy Nilly seems like a stretch even for us
Bc we gave North our F3 in the logue tucker trade
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

How can a pick tied to Freo be in the trade but we aren’t ?

I mean we may not be having a great trade week but throwing picks into other teams trades Willy Nilly seems like a stretch even for us
It is our future third round that was passed onto North as part of the Logue and Tucker trade:
PP-F2 (North), PP-F3 (North), F4 (North) > Logue, Tucker & F3 (Freo)
 
This is missing the Port F2.

I don’t understand how the clubs could get so far into the deal, which did involve 6 clubs, before seeking clarification with AFL first.

What a waste of 6 clubs time, when the rules were already in place.
Port need some picks hey? We could give them a first rounder for a certain WA forward on their books.
 
If I was north I would try and just do that clean gws deal anyway even if there's no mega trade. 3 and 12 should be worth more to them than 1, especially seeing how well 1 has gone for them this year
Reckon a trade with those key pieces will go ahead. Might be a swap of later picks as well. 61 + 63 (GWS) > F3 (Freo)
 
1665309429778.png

"Dependent on how much of Lobb's salary is covered by the Dogs" ?????? ****ing hell who writes these.

Fremantle: Publicly said they won't trade him. Have said pick 30 is no where near enough, and they'd much rather keep him.

Fox Footy: Yeah pick 30 sounds fair.

Reminds me of Rendell saying we should trade him to giants for pick 53 and pay half his salary.
 
View attachment 1531063

"Dependent on how much of Lobb's salary is covered by the Dogs" ?????? ******* hell who writes these.

Fremantle: Publicly said they won't trade him. Have said pick 30 is no where near enough, and they'd much rather keep him.

Fox Footy: Yeah pick 30 sounds fair.

Reminds me of Rendell saying we should trade him to giants for pick 53 and pay half his salary.
The funny part is this won't even be the worst take you could find. Some seriously terrible journalists/analysts out there.
 
View attachment 1531063

"Dependent on how much of Lobb's salary is covered by the Dogs" ?????? ******* hell who writes these.

Fremantle: Publicly said they won't trade him. Have said pick 30 is no where near enough, and they'd much rather keep him.

Fox Footy: Yeah pick 30 sounds fair.

Reminds me of Rendell saying we should trade him to giants for pick 53 and pay half his salary.
Who are you quoting?
 
This is missing the Port F2.

I don’t understand how the clubs could get so far into the deal, which did involve 6 clubs, before seeking clarification with AFL first.

What a waste of 6 clubs time, when the rules were already in place.

A bit strange

AFL actually upholding a rule they’ve put in place

Interesting time to do it tbh, I thought it was a decent proposal


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
As Lobb is in contract, we’re not obliged to trade him, right? If he decided to sit out next year, we would still be paying his contract to do nothing?
Lucky for us I’m ok with this situation. He signed a front ended contract so would expect max $450k write off. I’m fine with that. Lobb sitting out a year unable to train with an AFL club essentially be career limiting. 31 yo not playing professional football for twelve months, what’s that worth contract wise? Colin young as a manager would look fantastic in that scenario, who would he blame Fremantle?

Dogs need to provide a picks.

Edit: for those more technical would Lobb need to opt out of the last year of his contract for this to occur? Ie if he doesn’t turn up to training the contract becomes null and void so we pay $0?
 
Last edited:
'WA teen breaks 14-year-old record at Draft Combine'

We may miss Allen, but could/would/should we snag Darcy Jones with our first pick?

I guarantee eagles will pick him.

Had that feeling every since I eyed him


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top