Sir Ronald Mac
Team Captain
- Mar 25, 2023
- 312
- 415
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Banned
- #5,351
10 + F1st for 7 + F2nd is what GWS want apparently.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Which is probably what i’d be wanting the crows to be asking for if the shoe was on the other foot and it was the crows holding pick 7 and Gws with 10 and wanting our 7…10 + F1st for 7 + F2nd is what GWS want apparently.
GC matching at least 4 tomorrow and TuesdayNot sure why people are so worried about matching next year.
GC are going to be able to match 3 players including one who might be pick 2.
Matching 1 player is nothing.
I’m not doing that10 + F1st for 7 + F2nd is what GWS want apparently.
Nah keep 20 or slide it back a bit in this draft to bank a future pick while still using it if we rate a player that we think we can get a bit laterSo trade out 20 for a pick next year? Can’t see us doing that. We have Melbournes pick and we can worry about that next year.
Next years draft is supposed to be gun midfielders, I’m not giving up a potential top 10 pick so we can move up 3 places.Which is probably what i’d be wanting the crows to be asking for if the shoe was on the other foot and it was the crows holding pick 7 and Gws with 10 and wanting our 7…
so.. it probably fair.
In 2019 we traded pick No.4 to GWS in exchange for two first round selections pick No.6 in that 2019 draft and Giants’ first round pick in the 2020 draft..
Maybe we should probably feel lucky gws would be willing to chuck the second rounder back to us..
moving up in the top 10 of drafts is always a costly exercise.
Oh get it nowNah keep 20 or slide it back a bit in this draft to bank a future pick while still using it if we rate a player that we think we can get a bit later
Happy to just use pick 20 and not slide it back if we rate a player and think we need to take him there rather than late 20s
It really depends on how highly you rate Curtin. I’m a big fanNext years draft is supposed to be gun midfielders, I’m not giving up a potential top 10 pick so we can move up 3 places.
Yeah the only player I’d trade a future 1st in for is MckercherNext years draft is supposed to be gun midfielders, I’m not giving up a potential top 10 pick so we can move up 3 places.
It’s Curtin this year but what about next year, what are we potentially giving up? We could easily have a down year next year.It really depends on how highly you rate Curtin. I’m a big fan
I’d be asking for 16 for 20 on top of it, but I’d be very tempted to say yes
Plenty of clubs overlooked some of the current best players in the comp in their draft years, too. We shouldn’t care about how other clubs rate a player - put faith in our own talent IDIt’s Curtin this year but what about next year, what are we potentially giving up? We could easily have a down year next year.
Curtin if he gets to 7 will have been overlooked 6 times, including by one club twice.
We keep 10, select a quality player and bank another one next year.
Curtin is a star , I hope we get him but wouldn’t use a future 1stIt’s Curtin this year but what about next year, what are we potentially giving up? We could easily have a down year next year.
Curtin if he gets to 7 will have been overlooked 6 times, including by one club twice.
We keep 10, select a quality player and bank another one next year.
We're not going to the draft next year from all reports, 2 x f/s but will be trades and f/a.It’s Curtin this year but what about next year, what are we potentially giving up? We could easily have a down year next year.
Curtin if he gets to 7 will have been overlooked 6 times, including by one club twice.
We keep 10, select a quality player and bank another one next year.
Curtin would be our payback to Fremantle for taking pavlich his whole career, hopefully we could be as successful.10 + F1st for 7 + F2nd is what GWS want apparently.
Yeah.. all those flags Freo won.Curtin would be our payback to Fremantle for taking pavlich his whole career, hopefully we could be as successful.
On SM-F926B using BigFooty.com mobile app
In keeping him, not sure why you are thinking about Fremantle flags...Yeah.. all those flags Freo won.
Both teams failed. Fremantle with Pavlich, us without him.In keeping him, not sure why you are thinking about Fremantle flags...
On SM-F926B using BigFooty.com mobile app
I'm referring to the way Curtin plays and the similarly to Pavlich, and the irony if we had the WA version for his career, but couldn't get Pavlich for his, even though we tried a number of times.Both teams failed. Fremantle with Pavlich, us without him.
Takes more than one player, and if Pav wanted a flag he probably should've come home.
That’s not what Ogilvie said, he said we wouldn’t grab 3 players at the draft next year, not that we wouldn’t draft.We're not going to the draft next year from all reports, 2 x f/s but will be trades and f/a.
Still, would love a high end mid next year, clearly what we need.
If we did trade out our future first, I'd be keen to trade 20 for ports f1 from Fremantle.
On SM-F926B using BigFooty.com mobile app
Maybe optics to try and get WCE to trade pick 1 to north if they think they are no chance of getting him with an f1 a bit later in the draft...WCE apparently really want both..do they actually want curtin more if they can only get one of them2 and half hour meeting before the draft? Clarksons not wasting his time if he won’t get his way.
Nah can’t see that. They’d want Reid more.Maybe optics to try and get WCE to trade pick 1 to north if they think they are no chance of getting him with an f1 a bit later in the draft...WCE apparently really want both..do they actually want curtin more if they can only get one of them