- Mar 26, 2007
- 21,491
- 46,390
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- SA Spurs, Anaheim Ducks, White Sox
Depends on Finlayson's form. His end of season decline was a worry. Continue that and he is playing SANFL next year.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We should be playing Lord ahead of Dixon every game.i agree Marshall and Dixon are first picked. Despite the latter being contrary to popular belief, if he is fit he is getting picked.
Pretty much. He' borderline useless in the ruck and he doesn't really want to be there anyway.Finlayson in the ruck has genuinely worked about twice. Every coach in the league worked him out long ago
Gawn went at 65% ruck contests this year.I don't see how that makes a difference.
Ruck Contest on average are comparable to Gawn/Grundy's. (around 50% give or take)
So i don't see why you couldn't compare him to either of them
Gawn went at 65% ruck contests this year.
A fit and firing Dixon is still probably our best forward..... just...... if he's 100% and in form he should be picked first however they need to set a very high bar for him, any drop in form or fitness and Lord should come straight in and stay in until Dixon's SANFL form demands selection.We should be playing Lord ahead of Dixon every game.
But of course Dixon will play as Donut's needs to look after his own self interests.
Gawn's and Grundy's 2023 were widely recognised as being relatively poor.I don't see how that makes a difference.
Ruck Contest on average are comparable to Gawn/Grundy's. (around 50% give or take)
So i don't see why you couldn't compare him to either of them
Gawn's and Grundy's 2023 were widely recognised as being relatively poor.
Soldo was the main ruck in a Richmond team for most of his 8 total games. His sample size being 8 matches compared to 23 and 17 respectively makes this comparison extremely questionable.
Chuck the RuckDixon is a better and more effective ruck than Finlayson
He was the primary ruck in 4 of the 8 games going on what you have presented there.View attachment 1897111
He was the main ruck in 3/8, hence the 50/93 ruck contests. I'm not sure how you can be a solo ruck and just not attend 40% of the ruck contests in your matches.
I don't see how it's an extreme comparison to compare 3 ruck man who all average about 50 ruck contests per game. It's all about the ratios of stats anyway
Sample size is not perfect but it's what we have to compare
He was the primary ruck in 4 of the 8 games going on what you have presented there.
You are comparing someone that played 50% of games as the primary ruck and 50% of games as the secondary ruck.
Grundy and Gawn played 14 games in the same team. They shared the ruck role 82% and 63% of the time respectively.
That they had a similar average of attended ruck contests per game indicates that Richmond were not a heavy stoppage based team.
To say he stacks up decently against premier rucks that were obviously affected by their playing in the same team is reckless.
Here is another comparison:
View attachment 1897157
This is Sam Hayes (23yo) vs Ivan Soldo (27yo).
Is comparison of the first player to Gawn and Grundy relevant?
Surprised they haven’t built a statue of Ken Hinkley down there.The new building at Alberton Oval looks nice
That comparison is significantly less contextualized than the information I've presented, but go ahead. I still don't really understand your point, seems like you're just determined to disagree.
I've just basically said that Soldo stats as mostly 2nd ruck compare decently to a handful of other ruck man, and when extrapolated, he could have a decent season as a number 1 ruck playing 20+ games.
I don't really give a s**t about being potentially "reckless" or making "extreme comparisons" by just posting some data
There’s no such thing as a fit and firing Dixon anymore.A fit and firing Dixon is still probably our best forward..... just...... if he's 100% and in form he should be picked first however they need to set a very high bar for him, any drop in form or fitness and Lord should come straight in and stay in until Dixon's SANFL form demands selection.
I'm imagining the one that Blackfriars built but with a donut instead of a broad roll.Surprised they haven’t built a statue of Ken Hinkley down there.
We don't even deserve the "centre" label as we have a donut for a coach.lol as if they deserve the "high performance" label
highery performance centrelol as if they deserve the "high performance" label
The "remember 2012? We're performing better than that at least" centre.lol as if they deserve the "high performance" label
Your initial post was refuting Soldo being a dinosaur (read: ruck that only rucks, doesn't do anything around the ground). You were determined to disagree.
You also compared him to Gawn and Grundy, two of the best rucks of the past decade.
Soldo was not mostly second ruck. He was the primary ruck 50% of the time.
His stats show he doesn't do much around the ground. Despite attending a similar percentage of ruck contests to Gawn and Grundy they outformed him in disposals (read: around the ground work) by over 50%. This is despite Soldo having the highest ruck contest attendance for his team in 50% of his games and Gawn and Grundy spending the majority of the year in an equal ruck role. Soldo's average TOG was also worse than the best of Sam Hayes who was near universally panned on the board for his lack of around the ground work.
Soldo has minimal upside. He is nowhere near Gawn or Grundy despite turning 28 early in the 2024 season.
When Soldo played against Gawn he was beaten in the hitouts 40 to 26. Soldo also had the lowest hitout percentage of the three Richmond rucks over the season (as you so kindly provided).
I was trying to be consolational. I think it was a stupid statement based on poorly interpreted data that you have presented without context.
Stat (Average) | Gawn | Grundy | Soldo | Lycett | Hayes |
Sample (games) | 8 | 4 | 3 | 10 | 2 |
Ruck Contests | 69.1 | 62.8 | 79.3 | 65.7 | 56.0 |
Hitouts | 32.5 | 31.8 | 33.3 | 28.2 | 26.0 |
HTA | 10.0 | 10.0 | 12.0 | 8.4 | 9.0 |
HTA % | 30.0 | 35.1 | 38.1 | 31.9 | 34.3 |
Disposals | 20.8 | 18.3 | 11.0 | 12.3 | 8.0 |
Tackles | 2.0 | 4.0 | 5.7 | 4.5 | 3.0 |
Marks | 5.4 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Goals | 0.4 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |