List Mgmt. 2023 List Management

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Both players have seen enough games in weird peripheral roles that you're not gotta get an accurate representation of what they're capable of based on blanket career numbers.

What I'm going off is the eye test, the top end output, and the tale of the tape.

Jack busts his arse every game, and every contest within every game. Chol does not. Point to JSOS (and a heavily weighted one, at that).

Looking at their career-best years up forward, Chol kicked 44 goals in 2022 (2 goals a game), whilst Jack's best return was in 2017 with 19 goals (at 0.9 a game). Undoubtedly, Chol has shown a better capacity to kick goals himself. There's not a lot between them on Goal Assists, though Jack is slightly ahead on Score Involvements. If you're playing mostly as a forward and wanting scoreboard impact, Chol has shown more (albeit in one very good season).

In the ruck, I'm mostly gonna look at 2023 as I don't have an easy tool to measure career stats and can't be arsed spreadsheeting it year-by-year.

JSOS - averaged 12.6 ruck contests a game, or 13% of ruck contests in the games he played. Averaged 2.9 hitouts, or a win percentage of 23%. Of those hitouts, on average only 1 per game was to advantage, or 33%.

Chol - averaged 14 ruck contests, or 14,5% of contests within his games. Averaged 3.1 hitouts, or a win percentage of 22.5%. Of those hitouts, on average 0.5 per game were to his team's advantage, or 16%.

Even when looking at Chol's "best" ruck year (2021 at Richmond, attending 47% of ruck contests), he was still only winning 32% of them, with 25% of those wins going to advantage. Winning 10% more hitouts at the same conversion rate doesn't seem overly impactful if you're talking about 10-12 contests a game.

I think the debate comes down to how you value JSOS's workrate and football smarts, against Chol's scoreboard impact and athletic profile. The athletic profile is a hard one to measure, you'd want to look at how each player's ruck numbers compare based on opponent size - ie. does Jack hit a ceiling at 200cm, and anyone above that is going to hand him his arse, while Chol can compete with blokes up to 206cm?

I'd argue that there's not much in it, and that as such the workrate and consistency of application is worth more to the team dynamic than the chance of an extra goal a game. That goal a game is also assuming career-best output for each, which isn't a given, but you could make a case is more likely from JSOS than it is from Chol...most years Chol is only good for a goal a game too.
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

Oh the controversy...

I'm not suggesting or have I stated we should trade Jack...
We all love Jack as we love every Carlton player, though in some peoples eyes the Silvagni name, makes him more than Jack the footballer...

Over their careers as a forward/ruck Chol has better stats playing this role, but not enough to go out targeting him over the expense of Jack...
If Jack was to exercise his options and move on I'd be open to replacing him with Chol...

With Levi, happy with the decision the club made.

Silvagni is ten times the footballer Chol is

Chol can and does have purple patches and is a much better pure athlete than is Jack

But Chol lacks an ounce of a football brain and from reports lacks the work ethic to reduce its impact. He's the type of player who can get the ball five times in a quarter which should lead the three or four goals to him and his team ****ing **** it up so badly that it results in three or four goals going the other way. He's openly mocked locally for it. It's primarily why he was out of their 22 most of the year. They much prefer Levi.

That said I'd love a Chol type athlete on the list who had some footy IQ. Would be the perfect complement to TDK.

But it's not Chol
 
Last edited:
Would be very open to the club trialing Dom Akuei in a forward/ruck role at reserves level. Even if it's just so that we've got another break glass option down the track. I think that's almost preferable - cheap player who could easily exist on the list for 3-4 more years, playing mostly reserves, but filling a very niche requirement from a depth perspective.

It's more realistic than finding an AFL-quality forward/ruck that we can squeeze in alongside Harry and Charlie and TDK who won't cost too much, or a borderline AFL-quality forward/ruck who is willing to move clubs and play mostly VFL.

Dom's only 21 years old, height listings vary from one place to another, but the club website has both he and Jack at 194cm. Believe he has Jack covered in the vertical leap fairly comfortably.

With Kemp coming on as a defender, Marchbank seemingly fit again, Gov signed up, and the prospect of maybe recruiting a young key defender in the next year or two - forward/ruck could be the natural pivot for Dom both from our list needs and the best opportunity for him and his football.
 
Would be very open to the club trialing Dom Akuei in a forward/ruck role at reserves level. Even if it's just so that we've got another break glass option down the track. I think that's almost preferable - cheap player who could easily exist on the list for 3-4 more years, playing mostly reserves, but filling a very niche requirement from a depth perspective.

It's more realistic than finding an AFL-quality forward/ruck that we can squeeze in alongside Harry and Charlie and TDK who won't cost too much, or a borderline AFL-quality forward/ruck who is willing to move clubs and play mostly VFL.

Dom's only 21 years old, height listings vary from one place to another, but the club website has both he and Jack at 194cm. Believe he has Jack covered in the vertical leap fairly comfortably.

With Kemp coming on as a defender, Marchbank seemingly fit again, Gov signed up, and the prospect of maybe recruiting a young key defender in the next year or two - forward/ruck could be the natural pivot for Dom both from our list needs and the best opportunity for him and his football.
I would be surprised if Dom is on our list beyond 2024. Must be upgraded to the main list to continue. We are going to be struggling to find list spots next season as it is. Dom could have a decent highlights compilation, and I don’t doubt him on the score of ability. Either application or football acumen, or both are missing. He does not have a large enough body of work.

If someone could flick a switch and have him fully focussed, I have little doubt he has the ability, but on output, he will need a massive spike to be persisted with beyond his rookie limit next season. He will need to command a spot to be retained, not be around the mark. Spots are too tight.
 
Very different types of players, though. If you want a bloke to anchor your forward line around, that's Casboult. Chol is more second or even third tall, which is exactly where he'd slot in for us. His first year at the Suns he tallied 2 goals a game whilst also offering some ruck relief, that kind of output would be incredible for us.

The main question lies around commitment to the cause. You'd want to be sure he'd buy in to the defensive game plan. He's quick and lays some good tackles, but can he apply pressure through four quarters or does the focus and intensity waver?

Then there's the matter of how we fit him in. Do you play him ahead of Pittonet, with TDK taking the majority of the ruck load? Do you play him in addition to TDK and Pittonet and go super tall up forward (Harry, Chol, Charlie and at times a resting ruck)? Does he offer enough that he slots straight in ahead of JSOS in those same calculations?

As much as his 2022 performances excite me, the rest of his career offers less assurance.

Gut feel is that we'd be better served just playing JSOS and pumping as much development into Hudson O'Keeffe as possible. No reason he can't be ready for a dozen games as a second/third forward and relief ruck by the time 2025 rolls around. He'll have Charlie and Harry taking the main defenders, TDK bullocking through the centre bounce, and he'll get the third defender and second ruck to navigate as he hones his craft at the top level.

Chol if going off his 2022 numbers would be a fantastic addition for us, 2nd ruck behind TDK who provides a target up forward. UIts very weird how much he has dropped off this year.

On a seperate note, this could be a big issue for GC, Chol left Richmond to go home to Queensland, where he signed a long term deal, i remember him talking about moving back to where his family were. If I’m Chol, I’m not sure I’m interested in leaving, unless its to the Lions.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

While we would be regarded as having an “established” list now, we have enough glorious, intriguing uncertainties to keep us thinking.

The Irish lads, Monahan’s physical attributes (189cm) and athleticism raise questions. Does he start back as many/most of the Irish recruits do? (We are stacked in defence), forward, or will he pickup the game and become a winger midfield option going forward?

Duffy is even more intriguing at 194cm and as athletic as **** Peripheral role like his countryman is likely to have? In the middle as he shows an inclination to bring others around him in to the game? Or, having sufficient size, does he add to our tall, even key position mix?

Kempy has been debated extensively and I have been in the camp that he potentially plays better ultimately as a hybrid forward/mid. Realistically, he has looked less assured forward as a playmaker over his time at the club. That could relate to either him or our systems, time will tell. I much prefer that if he stays in defence, we try to free him up from a predominantly accountable role. Currently making a great fist of the second key position, despite being undersized due to his athleticism. His inclinations and instincts are more as a ball player than an accountable one, so he is currently doing a great job. Gov has the interceptor, less accountable role tied up (when fit), but ideally I see us drafting our next key defender in the near future who can move in to the second tall role and with maturity ultimately take over from Weiters as our key pillar in a few years. Kemp could be an absolute weapon in the McGovern role. He is “untapped” and could ultimately end up in any third of the ground. Maybe Crippa’s. successor in a few years. Heaps to play out.

Motlop and Corey Durdin are both “modern” forwards. Mots has taken some huge strides forward in the back end of the season. I love little Durds, and his work rate is huge. Just struggling still on transition positioning to be making an optimum impact. Not helped by some nagging injury interruptions. Both boys have midfield inclinations and are excellent link players, but surely their role remains forward first. Motlop clearly has the more instinctual, x-factor game, with Durds the better pressure player. Both have a massive advantage over Owies and Fogarty long term, in that they can hit the scoreboard from 50 metres.

Cottrell is another thought of as a winger by most, but does his best work as a half forward. Running defensively he is a great piece if the puzzle, but can get lost against smarter wingmen positionally. For mine, better as the “extra” than an accountable wing. Has a happy knack of finding space forward and a reliable kick at goal, anywhere inside the arc.

Cowan becomes interesting with our oversupply of half back types. His combative game with an already imposing body and a canon of a boot saw us reach for him. Now with McGovern and Marchbank fit and Cincotta and Boyd being real top grade options alongside Saad, Newman, returning Williams and at times Doc, Moo’s pathway to the top side is somewhat clouded. Do we “experiment” with him in the middle or on a wing? Could he even show some forward tricks?

What about the wings? Acres has created a home for himself, does a wonderful job mopping up behind the ball and no slouch attacking either. Ollie Hollands is ahead of his years for application, endurance and the ability to read play. Is going to be a gun wingman at very least, however I see him transitioning in to the middle in a couple of years or so as mids like Hewett and Crippa age with the bumps and bruises of the contested game. I believe Dutchy will fill out a lot more than many expect, although his endurance inclinations probably make it a slower process than for some. Can we find a spot for Jaxon Binns who could hardly have done more to earn a game in our seconds? Binns is likely to figure in the final VFL team of the year in his first season. Probably capable of playing a role forward or back, but just “screams” wingman, more so than Dutchy for mine.

What are we doing with Lewis Young? How much of a disconnect has there been with Weiters? Does he remain a long term defensive option in our firsts, or has he merely become depth? He is a confidence player who thrives in responsibility, I am not sure he comes back from this decline. Capable ruck depth and not useless forward, but hard to see him long term with our stacked list with the current “hierarchy.” With big Nigel as cheap back up for the durable Weitering, Youngy might be a win/win if he considers a trade to one of the teams in need of a key defender. Not sure if his contract value, but he seemed to be a long term best 18 player when re-signed, and looks far from that now with Kempy preferred as the second tall and his game growing consistently.

These aren’t the only questions, but enough to keep us thinking, let alone the brains trust.
 
Take a look at our out of contract players over the next few years. This is the final year our main list changes will be greater than the AFL gazetted minimum of three.

There is “wriggle room” this year, but arguably not much.

Next year’s OOC consist of current rookies O’Brien, Mirkov, Boyd, Cincotta, Cottrell, O’Keeffe and Cat B Akuei.

Then we have to trade or delist three from the main list which currently has only Carroll, Martin, Durdin and Owies out of contract. How many of them will we be happy to part with? Anyone find three?

We have to manipulate our “expendable” player list for next season. I am wracking my brain trying to pre empt how they will do that, let alone for the ensuing seasons.

Current “favourites” for delisting are Plowman, Honey and Philp, and many would like to see one or more of them retained.

Fogarty, Cuningham and Marchbank along with the three above are possibles for single year contracts with possible triggers for extension. They may provide expendable options for next year, but are just as likely to consolidate and command larger contracts.

The next is promote rookies this year who would possibly then face delisting the following year. O’Brien rumoured to be gone at the end of this season. Mirkov has his heart issue post surgery, he is contracted and as rules stand, must be elevated, however AFL strongly tipped to allow mid season signings another year as rookies. The same applies to Boyd, under existing rules, must be elevated. Cottrell, Cincotta and O’Keeffe are all contracted for next year and are likely required long term. Cotts must be elevated next year at latest, while Cinc and HOK are allowed two more seasons as rookies.

I have heard rumours that Mirkov will either be delisted/retire, or perhaps placed on AFL Inactive List and play with our VFL group. Absolutely nothing substantiated.

We have to make room on our rookie list for one of the Irish boys. Ed is retiring which will accommodate that. We still need to shed two rookies to return to statutory quotas. Some chance Sam Durdin is delisted, but for mine he should be retained. (If LOB is traded or delisted this may reduce the requirements.)

Contracts or otherwise still in limbo for SOS (re-signing), Dow, Fogarty, Cuningham and Marchbank along with Plow, Honey and Philp. Dow has earned serious consideration for a contract, but both parties may be best served if he takes up an offer elsewhere. It remains hard to see him getting game time if the other mids stay fit. He would do himself a disservice to remain an understudy.

I am thinking we elevate THREE rookies if enough room can be found. Draft numbers two or three. So the ideal for me would be to free up six main list spots. Easier said than done.w

Surely Fish moves for the rumoured sweetheart contract to give us a spot. I am waiting to see how Lewis Young progresses, despite being contracted. If he has somehow checked out or fallen from favour, it would be a good time to trade him with a few clubs wanting KPD players. I rejoiced at Young’s signing and he has done well before the marked decline this year, we can only guess at the real reasons. If they are irreconcilable, then we are best to trade him to somewhere that he is needed. We would gain a list spot and salary cap space, and he would potentially rejuvenate his career.

With Weitering, Kemp, McGovern and Marchbank seemingly ahead in the pecking order, and being happy to play a slightly shorter model, and Durdin as a back up to Weiters, with a utility like Silvagni able to add a tall defensive option, I would rather try to draft the next generation KPD this year. (I also have a belief that Lemmey will be a better defender than forward so would love to see developed him as a genuine swingman.)

We need to fill gaps on our list now, and a young KPD for mine is the biggest gap.

Our list dynamic is a strange one. Spots are at a premium, weak links are few and far between and we will nit be pensioning off to many in the immediate future. After Ed departs our older players will be Newman, Docherty, Saad, Plowman, Williams, McGovern, Martin and Cripps. With the possible exception of Plow, all are arguably at the peak of their powers dependent on health and could conceivably all be around for three or more years. The AFL is discussing incorporating a Veterans List to allow clubs to have a ten year, over thirty player eligible to be playing from outside the main list. Most of our oldies are imports from other clubs. Docherty would become eligible in two years, Crippa would be the next in line after that.

We are going to have a very real situation of no expendable players in ‘24, ‘25, and beyond, yet a requirement to move on three per year.

Austin is going to earn his money, and then some.
That is a very interesting way to look at it, and perhaps this is why we re-signed Akuei who at the time made little sense and then I thought lying our Mirkov this year would be beneficial however if we did this and replaced him with a draftee with a min 2 year contract we may land ourselves in trouble having to make a call on someone we didn’t wish to, may also be the reason we were trying to offer JSOS a 1 year deal.
 
Both players have seen enough games in weird peripheral roles that you're not gotta get an accurate representation of what they're capable of based on blanket career numbers.

What I'm going off is the eye test, the top end output, and the tale of the tape.

Jack busts his arse every game, and every contest within every game. Chol does not. Point to JSOS (and a heavily weighted one, at that).

Looking at their career-best years up forward, Chol kicked 44 goals in 2022 (2 goals a game), whilst Jack's best return was in 2017 with 19 goals (at 0.9 a game). Undoubtedly, Chol has shown a better capacity to kick goals himself. There's not a lot between them on Goal Assists, though Jack is slightly ahead on Score Involvements. If you're playing mostly as a forward and wanting scoreboard impact, Chol has shown more (albeit in one very good season).

In the ruck, I'm mostly gonna look at 2023 as I don't have an easy tool to measure career stats and can't be arsed spreadsheeting it year-by-year.

JSOS - averaged 12.6 ruck contests a game, or 13% of ruck contests in the games he played. Averaged 2.9 hitouts, or a win percentage of 23%. Of those hitouts, on average only 1 per game was to advantage, or 33%.

Chol - averaged 14 ruck contests, or 14,5% of contests within his games. Averaged 3.1 hitouts, or a win percentage of 22.5%. Of those hitouts, on average 0.5 per game were to his team's advantage, or 16%.

Even when looking at Chol's "best" ruck year (2021 at Richmond, attending 47% of ruck contests), he was still only winning 32% of them, with 25% of those wins going to advantage. Winning 10% more hitouts at the same conversion rate doesn't seem overly impactful if you're talking about 10-12 contests a game.

I think the debate comes down to how you value JSOS's workrate and football smarts, against Chol's scoreboard impact and athletic profile. The athletic profile is a hard one to measure, you'd want to look at how each player's ruck numbers compare based on opponent size - ie. does Jack hit a ceiling at 200cm, and anyone above that is going to hand him his arse, while Chol can compete with blokes up to 206cm?

I'd argue that there's not much in it, and that as such the workrate and consistency of application is worth more to the team dynamic than the chance of an extra goal a game. That goal a game is also assuming career-best output for each, which isn't a given, but you could make a case is more likely from JSOS than it is from Chol...most years Chol is only good for a goal a game too.
If the choice is JSOS v Chol it’s an easy one and don’t discount the value to our club in holding a player by the name of Silvagni.. His work rate, passion and being a fan favourite put him well ahead of any slight advantage Chol might have in talent.
 
Last year O'Brien was our number 1 winger. We never thought we would be so successful filling the spot. Now he is behind Acres, Docherty, Hollands, Cottrell and Binns. He's gone from being 1 to 6th. Not so much his form but from recruitment, players able to move to that position and from development.
He will have to look around for a club that can give him a game or he will be stuck on our list in our reserves side all season. Probably good enough to find a spot on a list at a club lacking wingers same way Newnes did with us.
It's LOBS lack of physicality that got him undone and caused the average disposal efficiency. So many on here were obsessed with him lol

Sent from my SM-G998B using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top