Resource 2024 AFL Draft discussion thread (Wed Nov 20 to Fri Nov 22)

Which realistically available player SHOULD we pick at #4?

  • Sid Draper

  • Jagga Smith

  • Harvey Langford


Results are only viewable after voting.

Remove this Banner Ad

Watching how the draft unfolded I'm wondering if the depth aspect was over-hyped. There are a lot of talls in the 30-60 range, and I hazard a guess talls tend to not be too successful out of the first round.
 
Watching how the draft unfolded I'm wondering if the depth aspect was over-hyped. There are a lot of talls in the 30-60 range.
Still going at pick 70 and likely a dozen go in the rookie draft. No way it was overhyped.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Yeah, we could trade for one next year when we need them.
Given we’ve dropped our lead ruck 2 years in a row, you don’t think we could do with a better ruck in 2025? You know one that we’ve been developing and one that doesn’t knock us back like Moyle.

And take into account when you’re in your “club defender” mode, we don’t drop a club leader and key position after one bad game, we’ve endured numerous bad games to get to that position.

So do you think that’s good business?
 
Watching how the draft unfolded I'm wondering if the depth aspect was over-hyped. There are a lot of talls in the 30-60 range, and I hazard a guess talls tend to not be too successful out of the first round.
lol, no one is forcing clubs to keep drafting players, they would have stopped like previous years if it was not deep.

Odd take and you’ve got likes from odd posters.
 
Still going at pick 70 and likely a dozen go in the rookie draft. No way it was overhyped.

You can't tell if a draft is overhyped on draft day. That's for five years in the future when every career is all but sorted.

I just wonder ahead of time.

lol, no one is forcing clubs to keep drafting players, they would have stopped like previous years if it was not deep.

Odd take and you’ve got likes from odd posters.

Of course, it's clear clubs rate these players.

That said, and I'm happy to be wrong here (I'm not particularly for any draftee failing), but a lot of talls in the mid-part of the draft isn't what I'd expect from a draft that ends up living up to it's billing as a deep one.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

You can't tell if a draft is overhyped on draft day. That's for five years in the future when every career is all but sorted.

I just wonder ahead of time.



Of course, it's clear clubs rate these players.

That said, and I'm happy to be wrong here (I'm not particularly for any draftee failing), but a lot of talls in the mid-part of the draft isn't what I'd expect from a draft that ends up living up to it's billing as a deep one.
And yet you’ve just called it overhyped, which is it? You can’t tell until 5 years and yet just because talls are going deep it could be overhyped?

Maybe the mids and smalls were better prospects and the sheer quantity of talls has resulted in clubs still picking them.
 
Is that more than expected?
Probably though I always expected Polkinghorne and West to get drafted when a lot didn't.
Mollier did get a National Combine invite as did Charlie West so they were rated by clubs.
 
Draper
Camporeale x 2
Clarke
Mollier
Polkinghorne
Dodson
Welsh
Nicholls
Bowman
West
& 2 to the Crows with 100% local this draft.

3 of our 5 ins are from SA... 4 if you count Broken Hill which many consider to be aligned to SA. ;)
 
And yet you’ve just called it overhyped, which is it? You can’t tell until 5 years and yet just because talls are going deep it could be overhyped?

Maybe the mids and smalls were better prospects and the sheer quantity of talls has resulted in clubs still picking them.

I think you're overthinking this, because it's both. I respect that this isn't skepticism that can be answered for ~ 5 years, as these kids need to have a career first, but that skepticism is there.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Resource 2024 AFL Draft discussion thread (Wed Nov 20 to Fri Nov 22)

Back
Top