Chances Are
Debutant
- Dec 14, 2023
- 149
- 192
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Jagga everyday of the week.If Draper is gone and Langford or Smith are there on the board, whom would you be taking?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Jagga everyday of the week.If Draper is gone and Langford or Smith are there on the board, whom would you be taking?
You couldn't be more wrong!It’s the opposite actually. danger was a fast burst player with average rushed disposal, Langford is very slow but composed and a beautiful kick. Draper, Like Danger, is more that burst, speedy player with average kick, so the comparison would be Danger to Draper and Ebert to Langford.
Danger wasn’t a Hamish pick though, and I doubt he would have taken Dangerfield.
Yep pretty much thisI still don't know where I sit on Smith v Langford.
Smith gets a heap of it and hits his targets. Agile as any player and can get separation in a phone box. Never plays a bad game.
Langford won the carnival b&f over Smith and has improved more over this year than Smith (or just about anyone) and so likely keeps significantly improving. No breakaway spead, but really good on the outside. Super damaging. Never plays a bad game.
I hope we get Draper (as we won't get Lalor or FOS), but I could live with any of the big 5.
Totally agree. Just saying if they are set on him i think you don't use 4 and try to cut a deal for pick 6 and do it, but yep you are right and i hope we just don't get cuteWe need to take a gun midfielder at #4- not trade down for next tier.
If the comparison for smith is butters level...i am all for himI still don't know where I sit on Smith v Langford.
Smith gets a heap of it and hits his targets. Agile as any player and can get separation in a phone box. Never plays a bad game.
Langford won the carnival b&f over Smith and has improved more over this year than Smith (or just about anyone) and so likely keeps significantly improving. No breakaway spead, but really good on the outside. Super damaging. Never plays a bad game.
I hope we get Draper (as we won't get Lalor or FOS), but I could live with any of the big 5.
I think that the comparison is style, not quality (like Langford with the Bont).If the comparison for smith is butters level...i am all for him
He’s a bigger ball winner but not as dynamicIf the comparison for smith is butters level...i am all for him
Which ever way we go, I hope we get footage of the "war room" when it's time for our pick.I still don't know where I sit on Smith v Langford.
Smith gets a heap of it and hits his targets. Agile as any player and can get separation in a phone box. Never plays a bad game.
Langford won the carnival b&f over Smith and has improved more over this year than Smith (or just about anyone) and so likely keeps significantly improving. No breakaway spead, but really good on the outside. Super damaging. Never plays a bad game.
I hope we get Draper (as we won't get Lalor or FOS), but I could live with any of the big 5.
Butters might have been too at U18's level but he also played a fair bit forward.He’s a bigger ball winner but not as dynamic
Similar agility
Yep good pointButters might have been too at U18's level but he also played a fair bit forward.
Jagga reminds me of Pendles skills. That agility is top class. If it came down to picking between Lalor, Fos and Jagga it would be so hard. I think I would still take Jagga over Lalor with FOS a close 3rd. Sam in our side would be another Rankine, Rachele type player.Yep good point
Jagga wouldn’t be anywhere near as dynamic as a forward , he’s just a pure mid which is good for us anyway
Are we over correcting past mistakes by going bid mids on every occasion nowYeah this, I’d be okay with Jagga then Draper too
But the Langford rumours are definitely growing
All I’ll say about Langford is be careful underestimating himAre we over correcting past mistakes by going bid mids on every occasion now
All I’ll say about Langford is be careful underestimating him
Go watch his champs games ( any of them ) or his Coates league games ( any of them )
Sensational season against great quality opponents
I’m not against taking him. Combining him with curtin, and then the smaller types, rankine, soligo, rachelle, Taylor etcAll I’ll say about Langford is be careful underestimating him
Go watch his champs games ( any of them ) or his Coates league games ( any of them )
Sensational season against great quality opponents
Yep, feels weird. We’re very rarely in this positionThe good news is that we are all arguing about the same 5 guys and our (relatively) minor preferences.
It's good to be inside the top tier.
True but within 3 years will he be too similar ?My one and only concern with Langford is that he is a bit similar to what we already have down our left side. Dawson, Curtin, Hinge all big bodied left footers with reasonable but not express pace.
Just think Draper or Smith offer us a point of difference to our current mix.
I reckon Dawson will be playing half back in 3 years time, with stints on ball.True but within 3 years will he be too similar ?
In early picks you have to take best talent as need to look on medium to long term basis
Not saying he’s my first choice , just don’t underestimate him
Agree or even wing with his smartsI reckon Dawson will be playing half back in 3 years time, with stints on ball.
Actually think Smith will be a solid but fairly vanilla player. The player I'm shocked has slipped out of the conversation is Smilie. Just feel like he almost prototype modern midfielder.Yep pretty much this
Take Draper if he’s there
Love smith , just a sure thing star
Sneakily love Langford too , could be dominant