2024 Draft Thread.

Remove this Banner Ad


🎯 Draft Period, November 20–21
  • Round 1 of the National Draft: Wednesday, November 20
  • Round 2–end of the National Draft: Thursday, November 21
  • Rookie Promotions: Thursday, November 21, after the National Draft
  • Delisted Free Agency Period (3): Thursday, November 21, after the National Draft
  • List Lodgement 3*: Friday, November 22, 10am (optional; required for those participating in the PSD)
  • Pre-Season Draft: Friday, November 22, 3pm
  • Rookie Draft: Friday, November 22, 3.20pm
 
Last edited:
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

Quick update on the BF phantom draft. SMH

10. Reid
11. Travaglia

(Smillie and Allan still available)

33. Dodson

46. Hofmann
(my personal favourite, using our own live pick to select our own NGA player)

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/2024-phantom-draft-all-invited.1389034/post-85954356
That's the unofficial BF Phantom.

The official one is pinned to the top of the Draft board and is at about Pick 5 or 6: https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/2024-bigfooty-official-phantom-draft.1389183/
 
Quick update on the BF phantom draft. SMH

10. Reid
11. Travaglia

(Smillie and Allan still available)

33. Dodson

46. Hofmann
(my personal favourite, using our own live pick to select our own NGA player)


https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/2024-phantom-draft-all-invited.1389034/post-85954356
Can happen, looks like it's our last live pick in that phantom and clubs have used them to pick up nominated players onto the main list before, eg: North taking Jackson Archer and Port taking Jase Burgoyne in the 2021 draft. If we want Cole, Peckett and/or Hofmann on the main list we may have to straight up select them late, especially since we only have one vacancy on Category B left (McLennan and O'Connoll take up the other two).

This board will burn much more brightly if we overlook Smillie
 
Can happen, looks like it's our last live pick in that phantom and clubs have used them to pick up nominated players onto the main list before, eg: North taking Jackson Archer and Port taking Jase Burgoyne in the 2021 draft. If we want Cole, Peckett and/or Hofmann on the main list we may have to straight up select them late, especially since we only have one vacancy on Category B left (McLennan and O'Connoll take up the other two).

This board will burn much more brightly if we overlook Smillie
Yeah it can happen, but in this case there's still plenty of list spots left. It's just tossing a pick down the crapper.
 
And if they do draft Tauru at 2, one of the famed pure mids slides to pick 7, then there is Bo Allan. Murphy Reid etc. Fair dinkum some posting on here can be so negative.
You are absolutely correct


On SM-S908E using BigFooty.com mobile app

Correct Joff. We would then get access to one of the “big 6” of the mids. So win-win either way.

I’ve thought about the draft and I’m no longer phased by the prospect of all of Lalor, FOS, Draper, Langford, Smith and Smilie being drafted before we select with our pick 7.

In fact, perversely, it may create an opportunity.

Let’s say we draft Tauru with 7. Then clubs come for our pick 8. Probably GWS and Tigers.

Tigers may realistically offer 10/11 & 20/22. GWS might offer 15 & 16 with 32 coming back or just 15 & 21.

If Tigers offer 10/11 & 20/22 then 10/11 still looks attractive to GWS. If there are a number of players we fancy who will be there in the mid to late teens then trade-back again. Why not? Say, 10/11 & 32 for 15 & 16, or 10/11 for 15 & 21.

We would then have 15, 16 and 20/22 or 15, 20/22 & 21. Four first round picks in an even draft (if we include pick 7).

If (and it’s a big “if”) Allan, Hines, Reid, Gross, Dodson, Lindsay, Trainor and Hotton are there at those picks then we could get any combination of them. And those players could become the stars of the draft. Our guys will know better than we think we do.

The draft will play out the way it does. I trust Dalrymple to nail it for us. Whether it is trading-up (for pick 2) or trading-down (from pick 8). As supporters we shouldn’t myopically follow the consensus view as being the correct one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
If worst case scenario is North keep pick 2 and Tauru is there at 7 then I think we’ll be very happy in a few years. The kid has something special about him and I can see why North are desperate for him.
And the disrespect for Reid amongst a lot of draft watchers is strange, sure he doesn’t have the stand out attributes a lot of the other top 10 kids do but I think he will become a plug and play AFL midfielder for a long time.
The more scenarios that get thrown around the more comfortable I am that whatever we do with 7/8 is going to end up very nicely for us.
And yes, another ruck is required on the list but I honestly believe big Moose will be smashing the door down for senior games next season. I still have very high hopes for him.
 
That logic doesn’t work. How do you recruit for a future coach? When the future coach does come in he's required to work with what he has, and you back the current coach until he's gone. Then you back the new one.
True - but how do you recruit for a coach that may not be there in a couple of seasons.

In the end its all the job title.

List Manager - the one that manages the list

Coach - the one that coaches that list

Coach can have input into the type of player he wants but there's no way they should decide whether a specific player gets selected ahead of another.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Correct Joff. We would then get access to one of the “big 6” of the mids. So win-win either way.

I’ve thought about the draft and I’m no longer phased by the prospect of all of Lalor, FOS, Draper, Langford, Smith and Smilie being drafted before we select with our pick 7.

In fact, perversely, it may create an opportunity.

Let’s say we draft Tauru with 7. Then clubs come for our pick 8. Probably GWS and Tigers.

Tigers may realistically offer 10/11 & 20/22. GWS might offer 15 & 16 with 32 coming back or just 15 & 21.

If Tigers offer 10/11 & 20/22 then 10/11 still looks attractive to GWS. If there are a number of players we fancy who will be there in the mid to late teens then trade-back again. Why not? Say, 10/11 & 32 for 15 & 16, or 10/11 for 15 & 21.

We would then have 15, 16 and 20/22 or 15, 20/22 & 21. Four first round picks in an even draft (if we include pick 7).

If (and it’s a big “if”) Allan, Hines, Reid, Gross, Dodson, Lindsay, Trainor and Hotton are there at those picks then we could get any combination of them. And those players could become the stars of the draft. Our guys will know better than we think we do.

The draft will play out the way it does. I trust Dalrymple to nail it for us. Whether it is trading-up (for pick 2) or trading-down (from pick 8). As supporters we shouldn’t myopically follow the consensus view as being the correct one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The thing is BF St Kilda is inventing a "Big 6" purely because we have Pick 7 and 8, think about it.

There are some absolute jets in this Draft but we can be woe-is-me at times (St Kilda conditioning). We dismiss Reid. Dismiss Tauru. Dismiss all similar picks. Because of a Top 6 we've invented in this thread.

We botched 2017, so we must botch 2024, despite an entire different administration.

It's a talented, deep Draft and we have 2x Top 10 Picks. Everyone breathe, Clubs would crawl over glass to be in our position. All will be well!

On Pixel 6a using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
True - but how do you recruit for a coach that may not be there in a couple of seasons.

In the end its all the job title.

List Manager - the one that manages the list

Coach - the one that coaches that list

Coach can have input into the type of player he wants but there's no way they should decide whether a specific player gets selected ahead of another.
For sure, but that's common knowledge and the reason walls exist between the two departments.
As has been spelled out in media releases the coach's input is to say "Find me players that suit my desired game style" which if fair enough IMHO. From there the list management weigh talent, position and capability for the best overall outcome. Hence it's a multi year strategy to make any significant changes.
Last year's draft showed this system in motion, knowing a kid like Lance Collard will take probably 3 years to come good shows the timespan of the thinking.
 
I'll be happy with any balanced duo of:

Lalor
FOS
Jagga
Draper
Langford
Smillie
Tauru

Or one of the above in addition to two of:
Allan
Reid
Travaglia
Lindsay
Trainor
Hynes
Hotton
Berry
Armstrong
Shanahan

Which means, to me, it is almost impossible for us to screw this up
 
My very amateur summary of the mids we could possibly maybe select and ignoring this crazy talk of key position players
Name
DetailsTestingPick meDevils AdvocateTypeMy Preference
FOSHeight: 182cm
D.O.B: 30-05-2006
Pre-Season
20m: 3.046
Vertical: 90cm
Agility: 8.117
Yo-yo: 1000

Combine
Agility: 8.14 20m: 2.99 2km: 6:28
Most skilled and complete football athlete. Has all the tools and natural gifts to be elite.

Kicks goals high hurt factor per possession.

Would add class and polish as well as plenty of run to our midfield.

Is the Rolls Royce type mid that we will rarely get access to again this might be our only chance

Just doesn’t get enough of the pill on all the evidence this year

Had the chance to show something in the back half of the year post injury and really just teased.

No proven inside game looks pretty on the outside but we have that already

Would cost 7 and F1st for us to get him

Is an icing on the cake player when we need bake the cake first.



Best Case:
Rozze
Delidio
McLuggage

Worst Case:
Aaron Fiora

Given it will take our F1 and 7 to get him I am not sure he is worth it. I would prefer if it was Lalor he has a different kind of match winning potential but Tigers will take him at 1

Might depend on who we anticipate getting to 7 & 8 because we will not have many more chances to fix our midfield

I rate him and he fits the potential to be elite criteria I think we should be applying to these picks. Just not sure his strengths fit our main needs ie. Can he win clearances

Also if he is a flop this will haunt us for years. Two wasted top 10 picks will make Billings and McCartin look like solid picks
DraperHeight: 182cm
D.O.B: 05-07-2006
NoneRunning machine is fast and uses it to gain extra metres both out of stoppage and in general play

High energy player committed tackler tackles and has a good contested game

Will work hard to link up and be part of the chain

Performed well against men in the SANFL as a midfielder

Is a forward momentum player

Physically ready to play mid next year


All energy but not much class lacks vision and is competent but fairly basic disposal and decision making

Not sure he will ever be elite might be a more consistent version of Zac Jones

Doesn’t hit the scoreboard

Gets the ball a bit but not the huge accumulator like Jagga
Best Case:
Judd
Brayshaw

Worst Case
Zac Jones
Unlikely to get to us but some late phantoms have him drifting to our slot

Point of difference for us is speed in the midfield so would seem an obvious fit and is a more proven midfield ball winner than the similarly quick Bo Allan I wonder though as Allan is 190 to Drapers 183 whether Allan translates better and has more potential with his size to be a mid that can burst out the front of stoppage regularly.

A good fit for us and unlikely we would pass on him if he drifted to pick 7

Not a favourite of mine but like a couple of the others seems like a good fit and an instant improvement to our Round 1 team
JaggaHeight: 182cm
D.O.B: 28-01-2006
Pre-Season
20m: 2.990
Vertical: 75cm
Agility: 8.796
Yo-yo: 840

Combine
Agility: 8.484 20m: 3.038 2km: 6:27
Ball pig will be a Fantasy Football must have.
Will have games of 40 plus.

Done it against men in the wet and wind at Williamstown

Is as slippery as eel in traffic

Possibly the purest mid in the draft

Wins it on the inside and can be effective as part of the chain on the outside


Is as skinny as an anorexic teen model.

Is the new Tom Mitchell will rack up meaningless stats that go nowhere.

Can only play mid

Jagga is not a real name lets not encourage a thousand new born Saints to be named Jagga

Best Case: Neale

Worst Case:
Tom Mitchell
Again unlikely to be available to us but some here keep posting scenarios that have him fall to us.

No doubt we need a high accumulating mid someone that just finds the footy improves our stoppage game and sets our runners free.

I just can’t see the elite player and I worry he is such a twig who doesn’t look like he will bulk up significantly and that might limit how good he can be.

So not a favourite of mine but too good to overlook and would have to take him if he fell to us.
SmillieHeight: 195cm
D.O.B: 17-05-2006
Pre-Season
20m: 3.093
Vertical: 73cm
Agility: 8.501
Yo-yo: 72

Combine
Agility: 8.391 20m: 3.09
2km: 6:38
Enormous for a Midfielder he is bigger than Plugger and Roo.
Wins inside footy and has enough speed and strength to get the clearance.

Has huge potential to be the best inside mid in the game if he can channel all that size and strength to be the physical beast he looks to be.

Is also classy by foot and kicks goals from distance.

Has the capability to grow his outside game significantly

Huge possible upside
Looks like Tarzan plays like Jane (excuse the old school sexism)

No real aerial game despite his height he just doesn’t seem to read the ball in the air to make use of that size.

Season has tailed off after a dominant start and though still reasonable stats he did not stand out at the champs

Best Case:
Cripps Fyfe

Worst Case
Setterfield
Was convinced he would get to us with all the initial talk of him sliding. Seems less certain now particularly if Richmond hold pick 6.

Still want him the upside is huge he can certainly be a point of difference and alongside Pou would be a pretty awesome duo in 3 or 4 years with that size advantage.

Take him if he slides for sure.
LangfordHeight: 191cm
D.O.B: 15-03-2006
Pre-Season
20m: 3.213
Vertical: 72cm
Agility: 8.721
Yo-yo: 720
Combine
Agility: 8.642 20m: 3.24 2km: 6:24
Big mid with the work rate and knack for finding the ball.

Super consistent and kept defying all the knockers to raise into the top end of the draft.

Has a bit of the Lenny Hayes’ about him for mine. Puts his team on his back and does it week after week.

Can go forward and take a big grab

Has a long flat kick that can get past defences and generally uses it well.

Is more accumulator than power mid but still has the size to impose himself at stoppages.

Not quick but can run all day


No real standout skill how does he hurt you.

Is SLOW kind of ruckman level slow based on his testing

His athletic profile is really uninspiring and we have had plenty of slow mids at St Kilda can we really add another one.

It doesn’t fill me with optimism that the two clubs seemingly keen are Adelaide and Melbourne two of the least inspiring draft records over the past couple of years IMO
Best Case: Hayes Mundy

Worst Case: Josh Caddy
One of the possible sliders though recent phantoms have Adelaide and Melb keen

Not my favourite mainly because he doesn’t have that standout weapon but I can imagine he will quickly become a fan favourite where ever he lands just seems that kind of player everyone admires.

Different kind of accumulator to Jagga but like him we would have to take him if he fell to us. Will give years of heart and soul service and possibly his impact will be greater than just his footy

So not my preference but too good to ignore if he falls.
ReidHeight: 181cm
D.O.B: 30-07-2006
Pre-Season
20m: 3.025
Vertical: 75cm
Agility: 8.390
Yo-yo: 1000
Highest Footy IQ in the draft

Quickest and cleanest hands

Moves the ball on with speed

Has tricks and uses them

Releases teammates into space with timing and vision

Is super consistent high possession player almost never has a bad game

Kicks goals can play forward and has ability to create space and turn someone else’s fumble into a goal

No reason why he can’t build his size he has a low centre of gravity already

There is always a place in football for guys with that level of skill

Is short and skinny will get monstered in an AFL midfield

Is a gambler always on offence often chooses a no look handball rather than wear the tackle

Tackles as a last option and sweats on opposition mistakes rather than forcing them
Sam Mitchell
DalSanto
Now this is my favourite because I choose to believe in all the good things he does and trust that he can be an AFL mid.

I think he can be the player that sets up everyone else and elevates our clearance game to one that leads clear exits and to goals

Very likely to be available at our pick and I would take him. Note however I want to pair him with a player that provides some more athletic traits and grunt so Smillie Allan Langford maybe. Not as keen on a Jagga + Reid combo.

I fear we are one of the clubs who doubt him and he will slide past our pick

AllanHeight: 191cm
D.O.B: 16-02-2006
Combine
Agility: 7.94 20m: 2.99 2km: 6:37
Super Athlete fast agile tall and strong added to that can run all day

Is the prototype midfielder athlete who can blossom with the right environment and time in the middle

Already an AFL level defensive mid or HB and would add some much needed speed and power in our current midfield mix

Is an aggressive tackler and explosive runner Ross would love him you imagine

Is under the radar hidden away in WA and could be a steal with most phantoms to date just assuming he gets to West Coast

Has a long kick and hits most targets on the short stuff the knocks on this can be cleaned up in a proper development environment and with more time in the middle. WA development leaves a lot to be desired these days.

All athlete without the midfield skill and craft

This may be all there is to see a good athletic running HB who isn’t footy smart enough to do anything more than run in straight lines off the back flank

His kicking and decision making are at best passable but some would say inferior. As much to do with decision making as technique
Best Case:
Dangerfield
Elliot Yeo without the injuries

Worst Case:
Powell Pepper
Another favourite of mine in part because he is going to be available to us and I think he provides the Point of Difference we need in all the right ways.

1. Speed
2. Intensity and competitiveness
3. Size and he uses it

You would need to project continued development on his craft but all indications are that he has a lot of scope for improvement

Can play Round 1 complimented with a more skillful higher possession mid he has plenty of upside

Is my preference if all the other fancied mids are gone



LindsayHeight: 183cm
D.O.B: 03-08-2006
Pre-Season
20m: 2.970
Vertical: 74cm
Agility: 8.718
Yo-yo: 760
Is a lock to be a decent / very good AFL footballer

Versatile can play all over the ground and has one of the best kicks in the draft

Good runner – gets up and back and has enough speed to separate

Shown he has scope in the midfield and can win his own ball but at a minimum he is a very good wing / flanker

Accumulates well getting to good spots helping out in defence and linking up through the middle

Good work rate and dependable / consistent performer
Doesn’t really stand out just does most things well I didn’t really even notice him when he was racking it up in the VM v VC game

Does not provide anything new to our list we have a bunch of good wing/flankers who can run and kick well

Not sure he ever really becomes a Mid has about as much chance of doing that as Darcy Wilson does and we already have Darcy

There is no real spark here for me
Best Case: Jordan Dawson

Worst Case:
Christian Salem
Not a want for me too similar to what we already have

He will be available though and there are hints we like him so I fear he will be on our list

More comfortable if we split 8 and he is one of those we take.
TravagliaHeight: 187cm
D.O.B: 26-10-2006
Pre-Season
20m: 3.104
Vertical: 77cm
Agility: 8.452
Yo-yo: 920

Combine
Agility: 8.261
20m: 3.19 2km: 6:13
Really high level half back who just reads the incoming ball so well and defends with skill and class

Gets in the right spots makes good decisions and can run and rebound as well as anyone

Had some late cameos in the midfield and comparisons to Will Day which is why he is on this list.

Good enough to be pick 8 as a HB he was the early bolter but talk seems to have died down with Tarau stealing his thunder

Not really a mid can we really bank on turning another HB into a midfielder

HB is an area of strength so he should not be a priority for us unless we see him as a mid first
Best Case:
Will Day

Worst Case:
Dylan Roberton
I think he is unlikely now the possible midfield potential is very speculative and he wont be around if we split 8

I really like him as a player – loved the way he played in the Champs and think he will have a great career.

If he is best available at one of our picks I am ok with it but he is not a need and I would not be expecting him to be a mid.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

2024 Draft Thread.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top