Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
Whatever. Peanuts. Move on.Annoyed we're paying any of Parkers contract. North wanted him, they should be taking his whole contract
Always mister negative and uninformed and sensational at it.Yep wer paying the difference between the average salary and his next year . So approx 350-400k
To be fair that's how I read the initial post too. Thought it said "AFL average".Always mister negative and uninformed and sensational at it.
OK then. What is the average AFL wage. Lets get a figure then add SuperStaroverinflateeverythingStar estimation of Parkers salary. Then lets add 350k-400k on top and see his estimation of what North are paying him.To be fair that's how I read the initial post too. Thought it said "AFL average".
No takers?OK then. What is the average AFL wage. Lets get a figure then add SuperStaroverinflateeverythingStar estimation of Parkers salary. Then lets add 350k-400k on top and see his estimation of what North are paying him.
Clarke's also from my hometown, so it's a pity we don't need a medium size half back.
That said he's apparently decent one-on-one for his size and can go forward as a medium option, so it'd almost be worth the melts when people google image search on draft night after we take him at 26.
Would join the illustrious Mount Gambier Swans hall of fame including Simon Feast and Nick Daffy.
OK then. What is the average AFL wage. Lets get a figure then add SuperStaroverinflateeverythingStar estimation of Parkers salary. Then lets add 350k-400k on top and see his estimation of what North are paying him.
Yep my initial guess was like 50-100k which in the grand scheme of things won't mean much and also will be a free 100k off the contract list next year as wellNo takers?
Well Swans were only paying the difference. Parkers was backended. So his salary was high.
So take Parkers high salary -(minus) what North are paying a 31 year old = about peanuts.
So SuperStarNoFactsAgain is full of it.
I rest.
Cleary just ran out of characters because he doesn't have X premium. Even though he could have just created a second tweet below it, unless he doesn't know how to post both tweets at the same time440k is the average I go off, take it to 450k on a high end
Cleary just ran out of characters because he doesn't have X premium. Even though he could have just created a second tweet below it, unless he doesn't know how to post both tweets at the same time
Ladhams has shown he is capable of playing ruck at AFL level. His issues are between his ears. Stretch could win hitouts and tackle, otherwise could not hit the side of a barn with his kicking. Clearly not AFL standard.Look Ladhams is bang average, but McAndrew showed absolutely minimal progress this season, especially in the 'around the ground' aspects of his role. All he would do now is clog Green for opportunities - you couldn't keep both. And if heaven forbid, Grundy was out for an extended period, it would have been a massive call to have Big Mac as next in line.
Hopefully with Truslove going and McVeigh incoming as coach, some of the utterly bonkers decision making related to the VFL team will improve.
me tooJoin the club there wouldn’t know how to embed tweets
I mean you waited 6 mins...No takers?
Well Swans were only paying the difference. Parkers was backended. So his salary was high.
So take Parkers high salary -(minus) what North are paying a 31 year old = about peanuts.
So SuperStarNoFactsAgain is full of it.
I rest.
In other words, whatever it is, it is not significant. It is not enough to make a big deal out of it whatever it is. My point.I mean you waited 6 mins...
If it is "AFL average" then it would be Parker's backended salary, potentially $800k or more, minus the AFL average salary which is about $450k.
So that would fit with the $350k mentioned.
Now, if it's not AFL average, but the average of Parker's contract, that's different, but it's still probably $150-200k.
In other words, whatever it is, it is not significant. It is not enough to make a big deal out of it whatever it is. My point.
I mean, it's not nothing, but I don't have a big issue with it. I just saw how the post could have been read differently, because that's what I did before it was quickly deleted from this thread.In other words, whatever it is, it is not significant. It is not enough to make a big deal out of it whatever it is. My point.
We were going to pay it if he stayed. We are saving money. Someone else is paying the majority of it now. SuperStaroverstate everything is saying this is costing us. No. We are saving. We are paying the difference only. Not his whole backended salary next year.In other words, whatever it is, it is not significant. It is not enough to make a big deal out of it whatever it is. My point.
We were going to pay it if he stayed. We are saving money. Someone else is paying the majority of it now. SuperStaroverstate everything is saying this is costing us. No. We are saving. We are paying the difference only. Not his whole backended salary next year.
Not exactly that but Parkers list spot we now probably are only paying 300k instead of 800k which could be good for the chance of loading Chads deal in 2025 season.Pretty much getting the 700-800k off the books is the key. We resign Chad etc next year that’s more important
Not exactly that but Parkers list spot we now probably are only paying 300k instead of 800k which could be good for the chance of loading Chads deal in 2025 season.
So we are paying a fair chunk of Parkers salary
What a awful trade period this just makes it even worse no wonder we asked for their 2nd round pick
He would have to have improved exponentially from his run in the ressies with us.Agree have heard exactly the same thing too. Been flying up boards lately