Rumour 2024 Hypothetical trade and FA Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Neither LDU or Smith have much appeal to me.

Young, Rozee, Warner, JHF, Reid - that type of versatile, damaging mid-fwd is exactly what we need. I'm still pretty sure Mackenzie will develop into that for us.
Rozee is shit.
Would happily take any of the other four though.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I don't realistically believe we will be able to trade for Smith as we wont have the draft capital to please the Bulldogs due to our commitment to trade for Barrass. Both West Coast and the Dogs will most likely ask for multiple first round picks a demand we are most likely going to be unable to meet. So I think Barrass will eventually get done but Smith may prove to be unobtainable.
Just spitballing here but is there a chance that we could be trying to get our hands on another 2nd rounder? We could then look to trade that along with our 2024 2nd (from the Pies) + our F2nd for Smith? Dogs might be happy with 3 x 2nds in a deep draft or we could also look to move all 3 for someones 1st and then use that for Smith.

Don't kill me just like everyone else I'm just trying to make sense of why he hasn't nominated the Scats.
 
Seeing we went after Liam Henry last year in the trade period but he chose Saints, could we be looking to target another small forward and then push MacDonald or Ginni into the midfield more often.
 
Seeing we went after Liam Henry last year in the trade period but he chose Saints, could we be looking to target another small forward and then push MacDonald or Ginni into the midfield more often.

Henry was playing wing at Freo. Plays as a HFF at Saints.

He was pretty bad as a pure small forward. Was almost delist worthy.
 
And Hawks don't need him. What position would he play?
  • We already have 5 centre square mids - Newk, Day, Worpel, Nash and Ward (+ Mckenzie and Mcginness).
  • We are pretty well placed for wings (Mass, CJ, Morrison, McKenzie, Impey) and Smith does not even want to play that position anyway.
  • And Weddle is going to end up somewhere in that mix
So where does he fit? And he will be massively overpriced.

Hawks should have other priorities IMO.
He only wants to play inside mid.

Sorry but there's no room for him. He can be the man at the Cattery.
 
Seeing we went after Liam Henry last year in the trade period but he chose Saints, could we be looking to target another small forward and then push MacDonald or Ginni into the midfield more often.
Hawthorn were chasing Henry to play wing. Mitch Cleary actually said the other day if Henry came D'Ambrosio wouldnt of happened so pretty happy with how that all played out
 
My read on this is that neither Smith, management or Bulldogs would have thought Geelong or Hawks would finish this high.
Making both teams first round picks not very desirable to the Dogs - which they have informed Smith/management that they need to keep options open elsewhere as there is a chance Hawks/Geelong won’t be able to satisfy them at the trade table.
 
Genuinely curious as to what it would take for us to land Barrass and Smith?
Battle comes for free

Barrass is worth a late first

Smith is worth a first and then some.

I'd do our future first and Collingwood's second/ a player like Serong for Barrass
I'd do our first, future second and a player along the HH mold for Smith

Don't know if either club would take either deal though.
 
Genuinely curious as to what it would take for us to land Barrass and Smith?
Battle comes for free

Barrass is worth a late first

Smith is worth a first and then some.

I'd do our future first and Collingwood's second/ a player like Serong for Barrass
I'd do our first, future second and a player along the HH mold for Smith

Don't know if either club would take either deal though.
Our first could be as low as pick 18 and with FS/Academy bs it could be into the 20s - so happy to give it for Barrass alternatively happy to do a ff and take this year's to the draft - apparently a deeper draft - might get some handy kind of player (Weddlesque - on the subject of that - Sleepy Mark needs some praise for that move - McKenzie and Weddle in one year and Watson Dear and McCabe the next - that's some dynasty building right there
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Genuinely curious as to what it would take for us to land Barrass and Smith?
Battle comes for free

Barrass is worth a late first

Smith is worth a first and then some.

I'd do our future first and Collingwood's second/ a player like Serong for Barrass
I'd do our first, future second and a player along the HH mold for Smith

Don't know if either club would take either deal though.
Reading the Smith draft thread, it seems like Dogs will be happy with Cats First and F1 for Smith + Dogs 2nd.

Cats seem to think two 2nds will need to come back. Dogs have 33 and 44 as first 2 picks this year. Atm I don't want Bailey but if he comes cheap, won't say no.

Cheap is our F1 for Smith + Dogs F2
 
Reading the Smith draft thread, it seems like Dogs will be happy with Cats First and F1 for Smith + Dogs 2nd.

Cats seem to think two 2nds will need to come back. Dogs have 33 and 44 as first 2 picks this year. Atm I don't want Bailey but if he comes cheap, won't say no.

Cheap is our F1 for Smith + Dogs F2
That'd be well unders unless we send more to them I reckon
 
Genuinely curious as to what it would take for us to land Barrass and Smith?
Battle comes for free

Barrass is worth a late first

Smith is worth a first and then some.

I'd do our future first and Collingwood's second/ a player like Serong for Barrass
I'd do our first, future second and a player along the HH mold for Smith

Don't know if either club would take either deal though.
Forget about Smith
 
If there’s a team which desperately need Bailey Smith, it’s the doggies

Ironing
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top