List Mgmt. 2024 List Mismanagement and Trading Part 2

Remove this Banner Ad

He was already considered undersized at the time, 20 years ago, and our lack of a true key forward is often referred back to as a reason why we won nothing in that run.

Today, the bar is even higher.
i reckon tyler is faster than scott and he's definitely better built

i have no fears he will make it at afl level if he 100% applies himself mentally
 
i reckon tyler is faster than scott and he's definitely better built

i have no fears he will make it at afl level if he 100% applies himself mentally

He's not going to be a key forward at AFL level though, which is why he appears certain to drop all the way down to the 30s or 40s on draft night
 

Log in to remove this ad.

If Welsh is 191, that's fine. Might still have another 1-2cm in him too.
Jack Darling is listed at 191.
 
also, anyone stressing over height needs to get a ruler or measuring tape out, and just consider how little 1-5cm really matters.
That discrepancy in height is absorbed (and then some) by natural footballing ability (making space/separation, reading the flight of the ball, timing, and good hands), strength, and speed.
 
Wonder if we decided not to take Moir last year at 21, knowing that Welsh (another med forward) was coming in 2024

It's very unlikely, especially seeing football leaves little room for future planning. More we just didn't rate something in Moirs game or makeup enough to be willing to take him over Oscar Ryan.
 
also, anyone stressing over height needs to get a ruler or measuring tape out, and just consider how little 1-5cm really matters.
That discrepancy in height is absorbed (and then some) by natural footballing ability (making space/separation, reading the flight of the ball, timing, and good hands), strength, and speed.
Bet Mrs whattagun disagrees
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

We have Thilthorpe though

Sure, but that also means he won't be playing as a key forward for us.

I'm not saying getting him is a bad thing, and I'm not saying he definitely won't have an AFL career, I'm saying that he won't be an AFL KPF, and that being undersized for his skillset is why his draft rating has dropped right off.
 
also, anyone stressing over height needs to get a ruler or measuring tape out, and just consider how little 1-5cm really matters.
That discrepancy in height is absorbed (and then some) by natural footballing ability (making space/separation, reading the flight of the ball, timing, and good hands), strength, and speed.

It's not just about the height, it's about how everything else scales up with height - a 7.5cm difference in height (compared to the typical minimum height of emerging KPDs) makes for roughly double that difference in wingspan, and when you're sticking your arms up in the air the difference becomes much more pronounced. Some aspects of that can be overcome with superior athleticism, in particular standing and running verts, which is how Naitanui could hurdle leaden lumps like ROB, but practically speaking guys with that kind of advantage are rare.

e: Not saying Naitanui was too short, just that he's an example of a guy with springs for legs
 
Last edited:
If Welsh is 191, that's fine. Might still have another 1-2cm in him too.
Jack Darling is listed at 191.
Some players play taller than others too... particularly if a good mark overhead.
 
Sure, but that also means he won't be playing as a key forward for us.

I'm not saying getting him is a bad thing, and I'm not saying he definitely won't have an AFL career, I'm saying that he won't be an AFL KPF, and that being undersized for his skillset is why his draft rating has dropped right off.
Isn't he the same height as fog?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2024 List Mismanagement and Trading Part 2

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top