- Moderator
- #4,082
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I can only confidently say its FOS as no.1Who are u hearing is next in line bic?
Not a good ball user. I just spilt my beerComment was in reference to Jagga Smith
On our draft board orderI can only confidently say its FOS as no.1
No, I'm not. Really his ball use is the only reason he's not a clear number 1 pick this year. He's inconsistent by foot and prone to having off games where his ball use falls off a cliff a bit. It was a fairly frequent point of discussion on the draft boards - As I said though, I'm of the opinion that his kicking will improve significantly as he gets stronger through his legs in an AFL environment.Inconsistent ball user? You’re joking right.
Inconsistent, not bad. His best is very good, he just has games every now and then where it's sub par.Not a good ball user. I just spilt my beer
Agree Nick Daicos is a generational player an amazing talent.Yes. There is stacks of Daicos in Jagga. They play very alike. The difference is in the kicking. Daicos kicking is amazing. 55m goals on the right and 48m goals on the left at 18yo. Absolutely searing kick.
Jagga a great player but Daicos' kicking makes him elite.
And Draper is consistent by footNo, I'm not. Really his ball use is the only reason he's not a clear number 1 pick this year. He's inconsistent by foot and prone to having off games where his ball use falls off a cliff a bit. It was a fairly frequent point of discussion on the draft boards - As I said though, I'm of the opinion that his kicking will improve significantly as he gets stronger through his legs in an AFL environment.
He's still a gun player, I'd be very pleased if we picked him if we're not set on Draper.
No, he's worse by foot than Jagga. They'd both be getting selected for more reasons than their kicking talent.And Draper is consistent by foot
This is my impression as well. I think part of it is also down to playing almost exclusively as an inside mid. Even the best kicks of the footy don't have great efficiency numbers when playing that position. By no means am I saying Jagga is on his level as a kick, but N. Daicos moving to the midfield is a great example of this.No, I'm not. Really his ball use is the only reason he's not a clear number 1 pick this year. He's inconsistent by foot and prone to having off games where his ball use falls off a cliff a bit. It was a fairly frequent point of discussion on the draft boards - As I said though, I'm of the opinion that his kicking will improve significantly as he gets stronger through his legs in an AFL environment.
He's still a gun player, I'd be very pleased if we picked him if we're not set on Draper.
Peak Toby McLean was a bit of a weapon though. Injuries ravaged him post 2017/18 from memory and he came back a bit of a sh**truck inside bull. Had totally lost his dazzle and evasive abilities.Think Smith is more Butters than Daicos
Unfortunately, at times he reminds me of Toby McLean
Of the guys we are looking to draft at pick 3. Who has the best footy IQ?
Has that sixth sense for where the ball is going/should go like Daicos. That's where the comparison ends for me.Think Smith is more Butters than Daicos
Unfortunately, at times he reminds me of Toby McLean
This. Spot on.To my eye, Jagga's kicking is very technically sound. Its not a god given weapon, its damage mainly comes from his ability to consistently make a good decision. He doesn't have it in him to use his kicking to create an opportunity, he just picks the right one when an option presents itself.
How about "Dedge"?Smith's nickname has to be Mick, surely
Where did you get Jagga’s weight from?Cheers, couldn’t find any results other than the top 10 for all events
Jagga by a mileOf the guys we are looking to draft at pick 3. Who has the best footy IQ?
Similar to my view on him, which is why I'm keen to see his progress with it as he builds his body. With a bit more power/penetration he may have the ability to hit those risky targets he sometimes unsuccessfully looks for. I think he's the best brain in the draft, but someone like Langford or Lalor has considerably more power in their kicks which opens up other options on the field for them.To my eye, Jagga's kicking is very technically sound. Its not a god given weapon, its damage mainly comes from his ability to consistently make a good decision. He doesn't have it in him to use his kicking to create an opportunity, he just picks the right one when an option presents itself.
Nick also faster and kicked more goals. Obscene he wasn’t 1.Agree Nick Daicos is a generational player an amazing talent.
I still cannot understand why FOS is rated highly.
He is undersized as a mid (182cm), not particularly fast, and his movements look very Dow-esque to me (nice side step in traffic, but no burst forward). His stats went backwards from last year to this, and aside from kicking 5 goals in 4 games are underwhelming, particularly compared with other prospects.
He also had two injuries this year and seemed to struggle with those.
His 'best attributes' seem to translate badly to me. 'Stoppage craft' but he's not a accumulator? Overhead marking, but he's 182cm? Goal-kicking, but mostly when playing forward (where he doesn't get the ball).
He strikes me as exactly the sort of player we (and other teams - not just us) have whiffed on in the past. Has good athleticism, but doesn't really have a core AFL skillset and just doesn't translate up.
I'm no expert, but from what I've seen I'd rather Draper or Smith, and probably also Langford. In all 3 cases it's clear what they will be at AFL level. Draper is fast, a little hectic but he'll get the ball and add pace. Smith just gets the footy, a lot - he's a slightly different version of Walsh. Langford could be Dan Houston or similar.
Given we've traded next year's first as well as our own to get this, I really hope we just take the safe option. Throwing any of those guys into a finals calibre team where they can learn the craft as a part of a midfield that already features Cripps/Walsh/Hewett/Cerra to do the heavy lifting seems a no-brainer and a great way to keep our midfield sustainable post-Cripps etc.
I still cannot understand why FOS is rated highly.
He is undersized as a mid (182cm), not particularly fast, and his movements look very Dow-esque to me (nice side step in traffic, but no burst forward). His stats went backwards from last year to this, and aside from kicking 5 goals in 4 games are underwhelming, particularly compared with other prospects.
He also had two injuries this year and seemed to struggle with those.
His 'best attributes' seem to translate badly to me. 'Stoppage craft' but he's not a accumulator? Overhead marking, but he's 182cm? Goal-kicking, but mostly when playing forward (where he doesn't get the ball).
He strikes me as exactly the sort of player we (and other teams - not just us) have whiffed on in the past. Has good athleticism, but doesn't really have a core AFL skillset and just doesn't translate up.
I'm no expert, but from what I've seen I'd rather Draper or Smith, and probably also Langford. In all 3 cases it's clear what they will be at AFL level. Draper is fast, a little hectic but he'll get the ball and add pace. Smith just gets the footy, a lot - he's a slightly different version of Walsh. Langford could be Dan Houston or similar.
Given we've traded next year's first as well as our own to get this, I really hope we just take the safe option. Throwing any of those guys into a finals calibre team where they can learn the craft as a part of a midfield that already features Cripps/Walsh/Hewett/Cerra to do the heavy lifting seems a no-brainer and a great way to keep our midfield sustainable post-Cripps etc.