- Moderator
- #4,082
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
At pick 3 I want the best player available, if it’s Sid I’ll be very happy! I just don’t want us to pick a player because he is fast
Dempsey winning the rising star in his 3rd year this season tooLuke Shuey won the rising star in his third year having played 6 games in his first two years on the list.
Kai Lohmann just starred in a flag after playing 8 games in his first two years on the lions list.
Plenty of examples of the opposite as well with players who burned brightly early but flamed out just as quickly. Jayden Stevenson, Chad Wiegard, Lewis Taylor etc.
I know this is a ND thread, but haven't EH and OH employed a running coach like H and Cripps? Am expecting a step up from EH this year...I've actually cooled on Elijah a little bit. He tailed off later in the year IMO. His lack of pace and urgency at times took me from excited to cautious. Has the skill and poise, but I'm not counting on him to be an A grader just yet.
You are jumping off the wrong horse
And SEN has Jagga going to Richmond at pick 1.Fox Footy Phantom
Blues taking Jagga Smith, Crows taking Langford. Draper sliding to the Saints at 8.
What a topsy turvy draft year this is.
I really think this entire draft period is a fascinating psycho emotional watch.
Following the finals series, we would’ve been falling over ourselves at the thought of being able to add any one of Sid Draper, Jagga Smith, FOS, Harvey Langford to our midfield.
One month later, and now that they are available to us, we sit back and try to point out every flaw that each of them have to convince ourselves not to add them.
“Drapers kicking on the run isn’t great”
“Jagga, goes backwards too much and doesn’t take enough ground”
“FOS seems too flakey”
“Langford isn’t a POD for our midfield and isn’t quick enough”
"best" or 'better' is very subjective...If the selection was purely on needs Draper looks the one.
Question is for Pick 3 do we go purely needs or simply the best player?
Love to be a fly on the wall for the discussions between Austin, Voss and the recruiting team and hear their true thoughts
In that instance can’t see lalor falling past 2 whoever has the pick, so likely choice between draper and FOSAnd SEN has Jagga going to Richmond at pick 1.
On CPH2135 using BigFooty.com mobile app
View attachment 2168059
And SEN has Jagga going to Richmond at pick 1.
On CPH2135 using BigFooty.com mobile app
View attachment 2168059
"best" or 'better' is very subjective...
Not possible to say Smith or Draper is 'better' than a FOS or Lalor...
You can say (100% factually) that Draper's skill set fits our needs very well and that his exposed form at senior level suggest he will start round 1 and be a significant contributor from the get go.
Lalor is a forward/mid, FOS similar... has to be some doubts on FOS imo, injury wise...
Smith - I read all this stuff he could play as a small forward? Really, any history there?
C. Durdin says hi.
Draper for me.
Can ignore that phantom. Not based on any intel. Its just who the journo thinks clubs should take.
I don't know why but I just don't want FOS....In that instance can’t see lalor falling past 2 whoever has the pick, so likely choice between draper and FOS
I know it's an opinion obviously...Can ignore that phantom. Not based on any intel. Its just who the journo thinks clubs should take.
I want either Jagga or DraperJust from a couple whispers
Club rates Lalor & FOS
Next level, Smith Draper, Langford (no idea of the pecking order)