- Nov 14, 2010
- 46,051
- 52,757
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
can playRhylee West from the Doggies?
got dropped late in the year for 1 game
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
can playRhylee West from the Doggies?
He's very good, takes the game onRhylee West from the Doggies?
Straight swap for Luke McDonald. Both F/Sons and both need a change of scenery.Rhylee West from the Doggies?
In today's footy (finals especially) you need 2-3 of these types. They win more games than the tallsOwies literally does not improve us one bit. He's Paul Curtis with more limitations. We need a small forward, not a medium forward in a small forward's body
Its not so much that, more like identifying players who either compliment what we have or provide something we lack
Straight swap for Luke McDonald. Both F/Sons and both need a change of scenery.
John West for Ronald McDonald.
Make it happen Bob Ansett..
Luke McDonald's "need" for a change of scenery is nothing to do with Luke and everything to do with angsty supporters who desperately want a change of captaincy. I can imagine that Rhylee West might want more opportunities that he is not necessarily getting at the Bulldogs but no way is Luke contemplating a change of scenery as you say.
can play
got dropped late in the year for 1 game
Luke McDonald's "need" for a change of scenery is nothing to do with Luke and everything to do with angsty supporters who desperately want a change of captaincy. I can imagine that Rhylee West might want more opportunities that he is not necessarily getting at the Bulldogs but no way is Luke contemplating a change of scenery as you say.
It's the equivalent of screaming "just kick the bloody thing!" And then screaming "who was that to?" after it gets intercepted
Geez, so many on here complaining about the club actually sorting out players to improve the team.
Haven't been watching much of the last 4 years have you?
You are probably right although he may feel the opportunities he is getting, ie position he's being asked to play, are not befitting of his talents or ambitions. But he is playing in a team in contention and he may back himself in to move up the chain. He'd have to be slightly concerned about Riley Sanders usurping him.West played 21 of a possible 24 games for the dogs in 2024 Was suspended for one game he missed and then was emergency for the final.
I just can't see how this equates to him not getting opportunities
Don't think so... despite being angry and irrational, better written English!
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
This trade period is beginning to worry me a little.
Seems like we're throwing our hat into the ring for anyone that becomes available regardless of what they can offer us on field or not. Names that are being bandied about are just the same types of players we already have or have the same sort of deficiencies as those they would be replacing.
I would prefer to be seeing a laser like, deep focus on a few players who are genuinely going to improve us with what they can bring. We've already made decisions over the last few years that are clogging out list. We don't need more.
It was tongue in cheek mate, relax.Luke McDonald's "need" for a change of scenery is nothing to do with Luke and everything to do with angsty supporters who desperately want a change of captaincy. I can imagine that Rhylee West might want more opportunities that he is not necessarily getting at the Bulldogs but no way is Luke contemplating a change of scenery as you say.
Similarly is the reason that Curtis kicking less goals because of the quality of ball coming in. Or would you say owies is better than Curtis.I mean we lack goals. I.wouldnt be turning a nose up at anyone who has shown they can kick them on a regular basis, because it generally means they also know how to move inside 50
Examples?This trade period is beginning to worry me a little.
Seems like we're throwing out hat into the ring for anyone that becomes available regardless of what they can offer us on field or not. Names that are being bandied about are just same types of players we already have or have the same sort of deficiencies as those they would be replacing.
I would prefer to be seeing a laser like, deep focus on a few players who are genuinely going to improve us with what they can bring. We've already made decisions over the last few years that are clogging out list. We don't need more.
You're reacting to media and Bigfooty speculation, much of which is baseless.
How do you know there is not a "laser like, deep focus on a few players who are genuinely going to improve us"?
This thread never fails to amaze.
Being fussy about who we pick up… we have won 13 or so games in 5 years and have holes everywhere.
Last thing North need is another 18 year old kid.
Similarly is the reason that Curtis kicking less goals because of the quality of ball coming in. Or would you say owies is better than Curtis.
Also our fwd line is likely Larkey, KPF 2, CZ, small crumbing fwd (owies isn’t that) plus two of Curtis, Duursma, Ford, potentially George resting mids on hff, I don’t think owies gives us anything we don’t have a roughly 8 possie per game fwd isn’t really that great. The sml fwd we need is a crumbing def pressure type not a moderately effective mark and kick type
Examples?
We don't have any strong, defensively accountable partners for Larkey. Hence Darling.
Parker is holding his own as a midfield leader with the gf favourite. Seems like he might have something to offer.
Houston and Daniel are better kicks than anyone at the club whose name isn't Harry Sheezel. One won silverware, the other is probably the best HBF in the game. Seems like the kind of players we require to improve our diabolical rebound game.
Given where our list is at, and our chronic lack of experienced quality, they all seem like astute selections to me.
Who else have we actually been linked to?