List Mgmt. 2024 Trade & List Management Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Scott 'no friends' started a 'no Sanders to North' campaign as soon as we asked the question.
And now those injecting campaigners probably get first crack at some supposed gun small forward.
Bombers Superfan cal Tomey with the story.
What a ****ing joke this league is
 
Nah **** that. All they had to do was bring nga access back and not give us the assistance picks.
Would never have done that the optics would have been that we were getting 3 top 5 picks. The assistance picks were an easier sell to the CEOs and even then some of them spooked it up.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

  • They overreact to the Dogs getting JUH pick 1 as an NGA and change the rules
  • The Dogs get another top 2 tall as a FS in the same year the Dees miss Mac Andrew at 5
  • We miss Sanders at 6 the same year the Suns pick up 3 academy players in the top 15
  • The rules get changed back in time for * to get their NGA man.

But yep, a few future picks in the 20s and 30s we were so generously handed (on the proviso we traded them) has totally and unacceptably cOMpRoMiSEd the draft....
 
Remember when ‘clubs were angry’ at north have access to Sanders 😂

oh clubs are now angry that we got pick 3 for mackay, they want to change compo rules so that we can only get end of 1st even if lose player to big money.

They propose we should only get compo for player based on their draft position
 
We’re due for some FS freak or a draft steal.

(Our top draft picks don’t count. We had to fight tooth and nail to get those…more or less, not fight tooth and nail? Because we were just too shit.)
 
We’re due for some FS freak or a draft steal.

(Our top draft picks don’t count. We had to fight tooth and nail to get those…more or less, not fight tooth and nail? Because we were just too shit.)

I read some on North forums that we have quite a few F/S coming up over the next 5 years?
 
oh clubs are now angry that we got pick 3 for mackay, they want to change compo rules so that we can only get end of 1st even if lose player to big money.

They propose we should only get compo for player based on their draft position
Yep, both Scotts and Hardwick in particular.
 
Last edited:
It would be a little less frustrating if the rule was changed after 10 years . Not have it removed after the dogs use pick 1 on a player , we miss a top 5 academy selection 2 years later then they bring it back in the following year . That’s just completely absurd. The afl are a f*king joke of an organisation
The ivory Tower just creaming their pants over a potential Visy Salary Cap cheats from Lygon Street vs the biggest drug cheating organisation from Tullamarine GF in a very near future and will gift them the expected leg up.

Think of the redemption stories and mega merchandising $$$$ from all the long suffering *supporters...

Big, fat, bonuses for everyone at AFL house!!!!
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Collard. I probably should've said kid who used a homophobic slur. Everybody makes mistakes.
Heard it was multiple times in one game. Kinda less of a mistake and more of a perspective, if true.
 
The silver lining if this NGA rule change. Is that we’ll be getting the NT zone to ourselves.
Isn't there some small slice out of the NT that we are not getting though....which from memory is where all the good players have come from....can't remember what the place was called. Was a little slice on right hand side of NT map I thought
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2024 Trade & List Management Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top