That’s ok, the moral high ground we occupy where no Australian has only ever accidentally been doping or gambling/match fixing helps me sleep at night.
Don’t be asinine…address what I said or don’t respond
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That’s ok, the moral high ground we occupy where no Australian has only ever accidentally been doping or gambling/match fixing helps me sleep at night.
and ran out Jaiswal today. not having a good couple of days.
Wow December 1993 to December 1996. 2242 runs at 80.07.Without researching mate I don’t know the years but I remember he was just slaughtering all attacks everywhere he went.
This exactly. This is a culture that has created the global epicentre for scam call centres. If they can get away with it they’re as corrupt as f*** and if they get busted then it’s all indignant blaming and finger pointing.
Yes.
As they say, you can build a thousand bridges but if you make love to just one goat, they don't call you a bridge builder.
Celebrate just one drawn series and I call you embarrassing.
Sook would not even tryCan we all just imagine Kohli giving that shoulder to Andrew Symonds.
Did they venerate him constantly?My memories of Miller as a commentator on ABC 2 was his constant comparison to golf.
I believe India “controls” international cricket in the same fashion and for the same reasons that Victoria “controls” Aussie Rules.Don’t be asinine…address what I said or don’t respond
Tendulkar missed out on facing the India quicksTendulkar isn't even ahead of Kallis.
Scored his runs at a lower average than Jacques and doesn't have nearly 300 test wickets (a career of Zaheer Khan) to go with it.
I believe India “controls” international cricket in the same fashion and for the same reasons that Victoria “controls” Aussie Rules.
Is it corruption, or is it just gravitating to where the money is?
For clarity and any thoughts that this is “corruption”…..He should have been suspended for a test at a minimum.
I have no doubt any Aussie player would have been.
He should have been suspended for a test at a minimum.
I have no doubt any Aussie player would have been.
Tendulkar missed out on facing the India quicks. I’d prefer missing out on facing Ambrose, Steyn, McGrath and co myself.
no chanceWe're not enforcing the follow on surely
Sook would not even try
Causality.I’d be interested in your explanation as to how you think those two things are mutually exclusive
For clarity and any thoughts that this is “corruption”…..
The secret post-sandpaper-gate change that saved Virat Kohli from suspension
Andy Pycroft – who also presided over the Cape Town Test in 2018 – charged Kohli with a level-one offence for “inappropriate physical contact”, the most lenient grade of the ICC’s code of conduct.www.smh.com.au
After Bradman it’s difficult. Of the old blokes - Hobbs, Richards, Pollock and Richards dead set superstars (but latter two didn’t play many tests). Tendulkar and Lara probably above Chappell and Ponting.And I get it.....i totally get the love for Jacques Kallis (All Time Great by the way) and Steve Smith (All Time Great too), but Lara was just something else.
Maybe Smith's peak was as good or close to Lara's? But like i said, Lara's ability to score big..not many could do that.
Kumar Sangakarra (All Time Great) could do the same (score big) but he played 15 Test matches against minnows Bangladesh (three 200+ scores) and 5 against Zimbabwe (one 200+ score). He scored in total eleven 200+ scores.
Sangakarra: Vs Bangladesh
Batting records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPNcricinfo.com
stats.espncricinfo.com
Sangakarra: Vs Zimbabwe
Batting records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPNcricinfo.com
stats.espncricinfo.com
I have, in my opinion, Lara as the best batsman I've seen and Tendulkar is at number 2 but I'll say this....there isn't very much between them at all in my opinion.
Recency bias will have a lot of people say Steve Smith is the best but perhaps one knock is that he doesn't score big often enough - 34 Test hundreds (so far) and "only" nine 150+ scores. Consisteny is his strength.
Anyway as you said it's subjective and it's probably worth it's own thread actually for a good discussion/debate.
Causality.
You can (and do) get preferential treatment because you are rich, without seeking to ask for it.
For clarity and any thoughts that this is “corruption”…..
The secret post-sandpaper-gate change that saved Virat Kohli from suspension
Andy Pycroft – who also presided over the Cape Town Test in 2018 – charged Kohli with a level-one offence for “inappropriate physical contact”, the most lenient grade of the ICC’s code of conduct.www.smh.com.au
What, that not one single player has been suspended for inappropriate contact since the rule change, and somehow everyone calls Kohli the bully and we start playing the victim and should be suspended and we would have been.I think that article perfectly highlights the corruption of world cricket…I can’t imagine why you’d present it as doing otherwise?!?
India are the unofficial governing body of cricket ($$$).
It’s irrelevant what woulda happened with player X. You are quite correct you cannot be doing that. A local Grade player would get several matches - at least. As a Captain I would probably leave him in a lower Grade for the rest of the season - for being a Dick.He should have been suspended for a test at a minimum.
I have no doubt any Aussie player would have been.
Not really.If Australia wins here they play South Africa for the WTC.
I'd rather play SA than India looking at their lineup.