Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is pretty straight forward. Zampa is hard to smash, but he hasn't shown that he's even remotely hard to defend. Meanwhile, Lyon often gets blokes out playing defensive strokes, but he's easier to smack. It's like Boland versus a one day bowler who excels at taking the pace off the ball.
Fair points, but I disagree he's easy to defend against. 42 out of 180 of his wickets are LBW which point to a mis-played defensive stroke.
Fair point.That's just not true. That doesn't account for the amount of slogs and sweeps that are just straight up missed especially in the later overs.
Fair points, but I disagree he's easy to defend against. 42 out of 180 of his wickets are LBW which point to a mis-played defensive stroke.
The discussion is probably moot as I know he won't get picked. I'm just saying if he was, he could be expected to do a decent job, similar to the one Lyon performs, probably not to the same level, because Lyon has proven he can do it again and again, over a long period of time, and we simply don't have enough FC evidence to expect he'll get picked.
But if I was a selector, I would have been very tempted to give him a chance in the Sri Lanka series, and have been reasonably confident he could perform well in the same role.
A leggy is a more attacking option in my opinion. Zampa has such good accuracy and control, so he's more in the Warne mould than MacGill. (before anyone jumps on me, I'm certainly not comparing quality there....)Not in short form it doesn't. Just as likely to be from a slog or reverse sweep.
If they were going to give it a go it was last tour of India, but they chose to give Kuhneman a go instead - for pretty obvious reasons as he bowls the style that has been extremely successful on Asian pitches over the last decade. Kuhneman did well in India so they've stuck with him.
Fair point.
Swepson is a good bowler - the best long form leggie in the country. But in terms of leggies automatically being more attacking - his strike rate is no better than Murphy or Lyon - the other relevant leggies - Pope, Sangha and Zampa - have far worse strike rates than Murphy and Lyon.A leggy is a more attacking option in my opinion. Zampa has such good accuracy and control, so he's more in the Warne mould than MacGill. (before anyone jumps on me, I'm certainly not comparing quality there....)
It's great they are taking the chance to blood some young spinners, I just find it deplorable the lack of leg spinners in the squad. Leg spin is a wild card in a captain's arsenal, but so many don't have the full control. But I really think Zampa does.
Any thoughts on Swepson?
The commitment of senior Indian players is also being questioned, especially around the lack of first class matches for some, and that players have to decide if they're fully committed or not
I don't have a dog in this fight, I present the info for informational purposes only.Fair points, but I disagree he's easy to defend against. 42 out of 180 of his wickets are LBW which point to a mis-played defensive stroke.
The commitment of senior Indian players is also being questioned, especially around the lack of first class matches for some, and that players have to decide if they're fully committed or not
Occasionally when watching Jason Richardson or Mark Howard overhype a situation, my mind drifts off to Richie and the brevity of his words and the knowledge and passion that he delivered them with. I can pull about ten featuring Warne instantly without any effortI used to love listening to Richie commentating while Warney was on. A bloke that knew the craft inside out also and got more excited about Warney than anyone else from memory
Can't speak for others but does anyone else feel that once the Tests are over cricket season loses interest?
in the 80's and 90's we had the triangular series after the tests which kept the visiting teams here and the rivalry flowing into ODI cricket. And of course that triangular series had a cup attached to it. so they were not meaningless games.
With 20/20 cricket being the flavour of the times maybe a 3 way triangular series of 20/20 could work?
Just for me it seems cricket season ended when the tests finished. I watch the BBL but that has always been just a novalty/entertainment thing.
What are others thoughts? Should international cricket last much longer in our summer as it once did?
What's the domestic red ball comp standard like these days there Phat?I never ever thought I would say this but just following on from my previous post about the post-mortem and its Pakistan like reaction:
my team has lurched from one disaster to the next over the last 20 years and some of it has been its own making, some of it has been the sort of thing you just can’t help - money is a powerful thing - and some of it is just down to being a small fish in a big pond and the knowledge that there are always going to be times when you will lose to powerful nations and teams.
We’ve had some horrible leaders and administrators.
But in the last 12-18 months we’ve had some moments where those running the game saw some bad outcomes and thought ‘you know what? We will add two extra teams to our domestic competition, giving us two extra games and we will try and schedule it to make sure that every single player that can POSSIBLY factor into our Test calculations who wants to be there, can play, and we will do everything in our power to make them and encourage them to play.’
‘Then we will rearrange our test schedule a little bit so that those players are going to be better able to be around and still make some money doing what they do elsewhere if they can.’
‘We will have a mandate on changing the pitches a bit.’
‘We will re-introduce an academy team to our competition.’
‘We will promote under 19s players into our international program.’
‘We will appoint the one successful leader we have had from the last 15 years who led us to two World Cup wins to be our coach.’
I never thought I would see the day that the Windies would react to failure better than India
Did I hear correctly that the Ranji Trophy has 40 teams in it?There's a fair bit in that, but I'm also not sure how much Ranji Trophy would have helped them to handle Boland on a bouncy seaming pitch.
Ideally we'd get back to teams playing a fair few first class games whilst on tour, but not going to happen unfortunately.
Plus their lack of bowling depth was the real difference between the teams.
They have a minor relegation system - really should move to 4 divisions.Did I hear correctly that the Ranji Trophy has 40 teams in it?
What's the domestic red ball comp standard like these days there Phat?
I know you don't have a crystal ball but if the WI Board of Control are finally getting their act together, how many years before it bears fruit (from a test cricket perspective)?
Footnote: Imagine seeing Barbados vs Antigua (or for that matter, Trinidad and Tobago vs Jamaica) 40 years ago when all the Windies test players were available for the domestic comp.