- Aug 9, 2019
- 36,959
- 64,463
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Panthers, GWV Rebels, Central Augusta
Why do you say that? Did it say anything about a new contract?
#RollsEyes
Yeah I'm sure the club would highlight a player they're about to cut
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Why do you say that? Did it say anything about a new contract?
We should really play our entire team in defence. It is much easier and they look much better there.Nope I'm one to say keep Davis, go back and look at his highlights, reminds me of Jones second game in defense back in the team.
Davis has strength (now), can play on the smalls like Pickett and has height to play on medium forwards. But most of all is quick and is already one of the best field kicks we have. He is not only pinpoint like Sholl but kicks the ball low and hard (unlike Sholl).
You needs players in the defensive 50 like Jones and Davis. Play Smith and Seeds on the wing/HF line.
Should be extended by 1 year. Delist is Lynch, Talia, O'Connor and ideally Mackay with Crouch more than likely gone. If Tex doesn't return it means the leaders are then Sloane, Laird, Smith, Seeds, Brown and Kelly with very little in between to the under 22's, you need some older heads, particularly indigenous older heads given recent events.
Leaving the squad potentially:
Gibbs (administration list member)
Stengle
Talia
Lynch
Walker (maybe)
Mackay (maybe)
Crouch (maybe)
O'Connor (likely)
Ease up turbo - wasn't having a go at you. I can't listen to it and thought I missed something.#RollsEyes
Yeah I'm sure the club would highlight a player they're about to cut
You know the answer to thisWhy haven't we announced Mackay is not getting another contract yet?
There's literally NO reason to have telegraphed that we're not going to offer them a contract. If Rory Atkins can get us Band 4 (End of Round 2) compensation on $400K per season, then surely Lynch would get us Band 5 at a minimum.
TrueFWIW Gibbs and Stengle's list spots have already been accounted for with Murray and Parnell
I am still a bit confused by the contract status of Borlase and Newchurch. Did Borlase get two years and Newchurch one?
We can be swayed by character and/or work ethicI like Davis, and by his instagram feed he's a hell of a good clubman. But yeah he won't be on the list next year
Tend to agree.
On Davis - despite the raving about him from yesterday, he got pretty poor numbers. I'm happy to delist and not give it a second thought.
On SM-A325F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Clearly you haven't been watching SANFL then.The people bagging Davis ARE the ones who have watched him in the SANFL, where he's been disappointing for years.
That being said, we're getting thin on the ground with mature bodies and I'd potentially keep him before Kelly.
I've watched nearly every game the last two years.Clearly you haven't been watching SANFL then.
Not true at all, his first full season (following coming to us injured) he did enough to make many think he was a ready made Lynch replacement. The problem was, we played Tommy even when he had no legs. He's done pretty well down back this year, and has shown he's far from out of place across half back at AFL level.I've watched nearly every game the last two years.
Davis, when he's played, has been mostly okay. If he was playing for another SANFL team, no one would be clamoring to draft him. He's never demanded a place in the side.
Yep.. i’ve watched nearly every game for the past two/three seasons…In about 50% of the SANFL games I watched, Davis was bordering on invisible or would only contribute for one quarter at most.
Most of those games were him as a forward, he's looked much better down back this year but I would hardly call him a standout
Yep, shown glimpses and some real promising cameos but just goes missing way to often.In about 50% of the SANFL games I watched, Davis was bordering on invisible or would only contribute for one quarter at most.
Most of those games were him as a forward, he's looked much better down back this year but I would hardly call him a standout
With some very notable exceptionsWe can be swayed by character and/or work ethic
I wouldn't go quite that far, I think both have already shown enough to suggest a club might fancy going after them instead of using a late pick in the draft on a kid with less exposed form.
Remember early in the yeat Parnell was absolutely lighting up the NAB League against all the Victorian kids in this draft.
Where would Parnell have gone in this year's draft?They're not exactly common moves for what were two low draft picks in a bottom 4 team. Especially as neither are KP/Rucks. That said, it'd be a baffling move to not offer either a 2-year deal on our end.
If they were first rounders, it's a different story, and we would near certainly be losing said player in the offseason.
It won't happen this weekI think we should be very concerned if Mackay doesn't announce his retirement in next day or so as it scares me to think he will get another rookie year as a player 3 years older than Talia and Lynch and not even half the player.
Player | Fantasy | TOG | CBA | CBA% |
Clayton Oliver | 102 | 88% | 25 | 89% |
Max Gawn | 97 | 78% | 19 | 68% |
Christian Petracca | 117 | 84% | 18 | 64% |
James Harmes | 70 | 75% | 17 | 61% |
Tom Sparrow | 64 | 69% | 14 | 50% |
Luke Jackson | 84 | 69% | 9 | 32% |
James Jordon | 67 | 73% | 4 | 14% |
Angus Brayshaw | 23 | 76% | 3 | 11% |
Alex Neal-Bullen | 55 | 74% | 2 | 7% |
Kysaiah Pickett | 71 | 86% | 1 | 4% |
Player | Fantasy | TOG | CBA | CBA% |
Kieran Strachan | 73 | 88% | 26 | 93% |
Rory Sloane | 120 | 85% | 25 | 89% |
Ben Keays | 114 | 81% | 23 | 82% |
Rory Laird | 101 | 76% | 20 | 71% |
Harry Schoenberg | 55 | 62% | 16 | 57% |
Riley Thilthorpe | 64 | 81% | 2 | 7% |