Autopsy AFL 2024 Round 11 - Cats v GWS Sat May 25th 4:35pm AEST (GMHBA)

[marcus1232]

Was a slinging motion tackle that ended up with his head hitting the turf.

Is a free kick every day of the week.

Just went back and took a screen shot for reference.

Its there everyday of the week. Umpire too scared to call it with the context of the game.

People need to hold umps accountable for poor decisions

View attachment 2000423

This doesn't show anything.

Bruhn could of dived over the top and got it completely wrong

 

[Soggy2112]

Slung him around in a motion that ended up driving the players head into the turf.

Dangerous tackle every week and has been for a long time now. Umpire got scared on the spot and didnt pay it.

He didn’t sling him. Bruhn was trying to spin out of the tackle, Giants player merely held on.

You can’t fling yourself around like a fish out of water and then blame the tackler if your momentum causes you to go head first.

 

[The hands of stone]

Don't blame a lot of the Cats players for not being 100% in , played for unders for years and have now seen a huge contract handed out to a young player and another one holding out for large $$$$$$.

They'll bounce back but for how long

 

[geelong_crazy26]

Your screenshot conveniently misses the part milliseconds prior where Bruhn goes over because his legs get caught up under the Giants player’s, and not because of any slinging motion.

You tackle a player and their head hits thr ground as a result especially after you spin the player or take them to ground, you are accountable.

 

[Cmarsh]

Was a slinging motion tackle that ended up with his head hitting the turf.

Is a free kick every day of the week.

Just went back and took a screen shot for reference.

Its there everyday of the week. Umpire too scared to call it with the context of the game.

People need to hold umps accountable for poor decisions

View attachment 2000423

That doesnt proove anything. Except for the fact he had his arms free as I already mentioned.

 

[geelong_crazy26]

He didn’t sling him. Bruhn was trying to spin out of the tackle, Giants player merely held on.

You can’t fling yourself around like a fish out of water and then blame the tackler if your momentum causes you to go head first.

The giant players force ended up taking him to ground. Whichever way you want ti spin it, its a free kick. His head ended up hitting thr turf from a tackling motion that spun him around.

Been paid for years.

 

[EagleMan87]

incredibly undeserved victory for the Giants, the umpires should get the 4 points

Loser post. Be better.

 

[geelong_crazy26]

That doesnt proove anything. Except for the fact he had his arms free as I already mentioned.

Arms free is irrelevant. Its the tacklera duty of care not the player with the ball

 

[Soggy2112]

You tackle a player and their head hits thr ground as a result especially after you spin the player or take them to ground, you are accountable.

Giants player did not spin him. Bruhn tried to break clear and his momentum spun him around.

He kept his arms free, didn’t slam him and didn’t drive his head to the ground. Tackler can only do so much.

Even Chris Scott wasn’t arguing that call. Probably tells you it was fine.

 

[YeoShuey]

GeeLOL

 

[bzparkes]

You tackle a player and their head hits thr ground as a result especially after you spin the player or take them to ground, you are accountable.

Are you actually Bruhn posting after the game? Because I saw him slam his own head on the ground unnecessarily a number of times during the game...

 

[bzparkes]

The giant players force ended up taking him to ground. Whichever way you want ti spin it, its a free kick. His head ended up hitting thr turf from a tackling motion that spun him around.

Been paid for years.

 

[Cmarsh]

The giant players force ended up taking him to ground. Whichever way you want ti spin it, its a free kick. His head ended up hitting thr turf from a tackling motion that spun him around.

Been paid for years.

The Geelong player threw the football. That is why the free kick was paid. The Geelong player was fully free to brace due to his arms being fully available to him.

 

[Wojcinski]

love the fans of garbage clubs in here celebrating a Geelong loss like they've won the GF

 

[bzparkes]

I always wondered how these threads end up carrying on so long after a game, now I know why

 

[two blue tiger]

Even Chris Scott wasn’t arguing that call. Probably tells you it was fine.

That'd be about as rare as snow in Darwin.........

 

[Wojcinski]

I always wondered how these threads end up carrying on so long after a game, now I know why

You have the 4th most posts in here so yes, you should know why

 

[geelong_crazy26]

Giants player did not spin him. Bruhn tried to break clear and his momentum spun him around.

He kept his arms free, didn’t slam him and didn’t drive his head to the ground. Tackler can only do so much.

Even Chris Scott wasn’t arguing that call. Probably tells you it was fine.

The tackler contributed plenty of force to the action, just rubbish that he didnt. and eventually contributed to the motion of his head hitting the turf with his final fling motion. Bruhn didnt take himself to ground and drive his own head into thr turf. Stupid assertion to claim.

The GWS player caused him to ground and the action of his head hitting the turf.

I hope the geelong crowd and media are a bit vocal during the week and get a please explain.

No guarantee bruhn kicks it, but it was 100% a free kick and has been for years. The head is sacred in tackles that dpin fling or dump players to ground.

 

[geelong_crazy26]

The Geelong player threw the football. That is why the free kick was paid. The Geelong player was fully free to brace due to his arms being fully available to him.

Not how the rules work. The onus is on the tackler.

 

[VinnieB]

Was a slinging motion tackle that ended up with his head hitting the turf.

Is a free kick every day of the week.

Just went back and took a screen shot for reference.

Its there everyday of the week. Umpire too scared to call it with the context of the game.

People need to hold umps accountable for poor decisions

View attachment 2000423

Squirrel. Nice….

 

[bzparkes]

The tackler contributed plenty of force to the action, just rubbish that he didnt. and eventually contributed to the motion of his head hitting the turf with his final fling motion. Bruhn didnt take himself to ground and drive his own head into thr turf. Stupid assertion to claim.

The GWS player caused him to ground and the action of his head hitting the turf.

I hope the geelong crowd and media are a bit vocal during the week and get a please explain.

No guarantee bruhn kicks it, but it was 100% a free kick and has been for years. The head is sacred in tackles that dpin fling or dump players to ground.

Wong in every single facet.

 

[beema limapep]

 

[Farang83150]

Was a slinging motion tackle that ended up with his head hitting the turf.

Is a free kick every day of the week.

Just went back and took a screen shot for reference.

Its there everyday of the week. Umpire too scared to call it with the context of the game.

People need to hold umps accountable for poor decisions

View attachment 2000423

Are his nuts out there?

 

[Cmarsh]

Not how the rules work. The onus is on the tackler.

The tackler provided his opponents arms. That is why there is no issue.

 

[geelong_crazy26]

The tackler provider his opponents arms. That is why there is no issue.

not how the rules work again. Go back and read over them.