Atkins out - will explore free agency

Remove this Banner Ad

Of course they had massive amounts of cap room. It is absolutely undeniable with the players they had out of contract. Are you saying that isn't true? It was VERY widely discussed.

And of course it was part of the equation. They were in discussions about the Danger trade for months, and it absolutely would have been noted.

Why would Geelong NOT point out they have a massive stick that they don't want to use unless they had to?

Your naivety to think "no, they wouldn't discuss that, Adelaide is just stupid" is pretty shocking from you.

There were only a couple of players left from the salary parity days - Bartel, Corey and others were all finishing up.

Obviously they WANTED to keep their salary structure and bring other players in. I stated very clearly that they chose to pay extra in picks instead of paying extra in salary.

It's absolute foolishness to think that was a massive thing we had over them, though.

If we played a brinksmanship game like you're proposing, they would have told us to get stuffed.

on that basis every club has all the salary cap they need, in all cases.

sure they could throw out their cap structure, their list management, go 4 players short into the season

but that’s not realistic or really true

they had already agreed personal terms with Henderson, Scott Selwood, Zac Smith etc.

their lack of cap space is why Danger took unders.

we should have not blinked, ****ed them, their cap & list management. We’d have been no worse off

and they’d have been badly damaged

there is a reason why Geelongs big cap space was never mentioned at the time. And that reason is that it wasn’t true

then or now
 
Of course they had massive amounts of cap room. It is absolutely undeniable with the players they had out of contract. Are you saying that isn't true? It was VERY widely discussed.

And of course it was part of the equation. They were in discussions about the Danger trade for months, and it absolutely would have been noted.

Why would Geelong NOT point out they have a massive stick that they don't want to use unless they had to?

Your naivety to think "no, they wouldn't discuss that, Adelaide is just stupid" is pretty shocking from you.

There were only a couple of players left from the salary parity days - Bartel, Corey and others were all finishing up.

Obviously they WANTED to keep their salary structure and bring other players in. I stated very clearly that they chose to pay extra in picks instead of paying extra in salary.

It's absolute foolishness to think that was a massive thing we had over them, though.

If we played a brinksmanship game like you're proposing, they would have told us to get stuffed.


here you go 👍


Not seeing any mention of this ocean of cap space Geelong has here either?

 

Log in to remove this ad.

Four year deal for Rory Atkins, jeez he'd be absolutely laughing
 
Will we even get anything for Atkins?

On SM-G988B using BigFooty.com mobile app

4-year deal, so you assume GC have thrown enough cash at him for us to get some compensation from it (especially seeing he pulled out mid-season).

Band 3-4 is a pretty good bet.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Well if he is on 4 years at 450k-500K we will. Band 3 hopefully

The advantage for us finishing bottom means that Band 3 essentially becomes band 2.

So getting Band 3 for Rat would be a great result.
 
We have no option to match, Atkins is an unrestricted free agent
Ugh, reporting this time of year is just terrible.

I'm sure journos have already sued the phrase "declining to match".
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Atkins out - will explore free agency

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top