Rumour Bluemour Discussion XXXVII

[Bletch]

St Kilda: 7, 8, 32, 45, 47

Contracted player, so 32 ain't doing it.

 

[Soapy V]

Kemp gettable but for the right price imo.

Don't want to move him on, but if the Saints came with something eye catching, I'm moveable on him. Top 10 pick I probably make the move, but if it's something like 2 2nds or something, then no.

They have 7, 8 & 32. IMO 32 for a contracted young player is not enough

 

[Wickzki]

New favourite gif?

 

[swuzzlebubble]

If 6 and 10 was on the table for 3 why would WCE have taken 12 + 14 from us

You could ask the same about 14 from Hawks

 

[ESKIE]

Throw in Kennedy for 8

 

[T2B_]

I'd start by trading out Walsh...has zero hurt factor !

I feel like a double thumbs down react is needed here

 

[Coops93]

They have 7, 8 & 32. IMO 32 for a contracted young player is not enough

8 for Kemp & Kennedy?

Potentially use 8 on Travaglia. I'd need to have another look at the draft rankings, but he's around that mark iirc.

 

[T2B_]

Kemp? **** off SOS!

 

[RPCB]

Throw in Kennedy for 8

And throw in Jack for 7.

 

[ESKIE]

8 for Kemp & Kennedy?

Hey I said that !

 

[Wickzki]

Midly amused by SOS wanting to take on Austin.

"I'm goin' stomp a mudhole in ya and walk it dry! And that's the bottom line cause Stone Cold said so."

 

[Triniboy]

 

[blue healer]

They have 7, 8 & 32. IMO 32 for a contracted young player is not enough

But 7 or 8 sure as hell is.

 

[bluemahogany]

They will need to pay big overs, who are we going to play when McGovern does a hammy in the middle of the season?

 

[Juddrockz]

SOS strikes again!

On Pixel 7a using BigFooty.com mobile app

How bitter is this guy?

 

[Wickzki]

How bitter is this guy?

Apple cider vinegar got nothing on SOS

 

[Coops93]

How bitter is this guy?

Why is this a move that shows he's bitter? If we're happy to move Kemp on for pick 8 then that's a trade that works for everyone - just because it's SOS doesn't mean it's some kind of revenge tour. If he's happy to pay overs for a contracted kid then win-win afaic.

 

[BigFrizz36]

For me, I thought the trading for 14 was brilliant.
34 would have been swallowed by the Ben bid. Owies we almost certainly would have had to delist, and we got some more points.

So it comes down to 12 + 14 vs 3.
I'm more inclined to take the 2 picks in this draft, but yes, won't be able to assess until years down the track.
Let's nail pick 3 (which will probably be 4).

True that it will likely go down to 4 but 12 will become 15 and 14 will become 17 (Ashcroft, Kako and Lombard).

 

[RPCB]

Graham Wright, Nick Austin and Brian Cook reading SOS is after Brodie Kemp.

 

[T2B_]

Why is this a move that shows he's bitter? If we're happy to move Kemp on for pick 8 then that's a trade that works for everyone - just because it's SOS doesn't mean it's some kind of revenge tour. If he's happy to pay overs for a contracted kid then win-win afaic.

Some Aints fans think pick 47 is a good deal for him...rofl

 

[muzza99]

But 7 or 8 sure as hell is.

Then pass on to PA for Houston...simples

 

[BrisbaneCFC]

They will need to pay big overs, who are we going to play when McGovern does a hammy in the middle of the season?

Hynes

 

[FlowersByIrene]

Don't know what that deal has anything to do with Kemp. I'd want a top #15 pick for a contracted Kemp.

 

[Michael Jezz]

Liam Mcmahon and JSOS, we would not lose much with Kemp if we received a top 12 pick
I like Kemp but would rather Trainor or Travaglia or Berry.

 

[ThePine]

Pies really going all in, could be brilliant landing them another flag, or delaying their rejuvenation even further

Nick is a generational talent, but could spend a lot of his career at the wrong end of the table. (Something we know to well unfortunately)