Geez he'd want to pick up his form a bit if he wants $800,000 from us because right now he's playing like he's worth about half that.
This, there are players on our list that are in better form that are getting paid much less
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Geez he'd want to pick up his form a bit if he wants $800,000 from us because right now he's playing like he's worth about half that.
how do you know that?Goddard absolutely detests Lyon with a passion after what happened, wouldn't want a bar of him
I'm pretty sure Kosi and Roo go on to the veteran's list next year anyway, Blake is one that if he plays on will have to play for basically nothing, I'm not sure how large the vet list is but maybe Milney as well
Vets list changes this year. Think upto 5-7 guys can go on it but only $100K per person goes on vets list. Or something like that anyway
Think you're right AT... Comes down to number of players with 10 or more years of club service all being eligible, then doing a shitload of tricky maths...
"The Veterans List allowance will be amended to apply to players with 10 years service at one club and will be based on a set amount of TPP per player calculated as a percentage of TPP."
- from AFL.com.au
Ps. My wife believes the only reason i go on Bigfooty is to see your Avatar on a daily basis AT... She may be onto something
Are you assuming he's going to GWS? because last I heard you only get one pick if you lose someone through free agency. Two picks was/is if you lost someone who was out of contract to GWS, or Gold Coast.I think he's going as well but it's not the end of the world. We'll get two picks for a bloke that turns 28 next year and as long as we draft well it won't hurt as much.
On his form of two years ago it wouldn't be, but on current form it would be way too much. The question we'd have to be asking ourselves is whether he's playing as he currently is because he has all this on his mind (like Travis Cloke, who it all seems to be affecting badly), or is this how he'll be playing from now on? He hasn't been at his brilliant best since 2010, but last year he carried a hip injury through the whole season, which probably affected his footy, but he's hopefully over that now.$800,000 on Goddard would be madness imo.
Carlton is a weird one. Two days ago they were quoted as saying that they "would have a tight salary cap which would preclude the Blues from trying to lure rival players to Visy Park." http://www.news.com.au/news/chris-yarran-deal-a-priority-for-carlton/story-fndv8f7j-1226373023201 yet the very next day Ratten says "Carlton had room in its salary cap for a big name, and even if it fell short would make room." http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/afl...nt-for-boak-20120530-1zjfc.html#ixzz1wShhu4A6 so their salary cap situation seems to be somehow changing on a daily basis!I'd be surprised if he left St. Kilda that it wasn't for Carlton or Geelong. Geelong are advertising their cap room, a top liner would still give them another premiership tilt, etc. Carlton are two or three players short of a premiership team, reportedly have a bit of cap room
The only clubs in the race with enough money and appeal to BJ would be Freo, Sydney and Geelong I reckon and I doubt he'd particularly want to move to any of those places, because, as I said earlier, they have inferior golf courses and he is golf-mad and plays pennant golf for Yarra Yarra. So not only would he have to leave his friends and family and our footy club, but his golf club and the other local courses as well. That is a lot to give up for another $100K or so a year, when you're already rich.
Yeah but I think we'll be offering him more than $550-600K this time around. And I'd be surprised if another club offered him a mil, especially considering his form for the past 18 months. And half of his earnings go in tax, so even if it was still $200K difference, that is only about $100K after tax.
It really doesn't.
Anyone who earns over $200k invests in a good accountant so they don't pay anywhere near that much tax.
An extremely large percentage of the tax collected comes from the working middle class. Packer et al would probably pay less tax than you.
I think you are oversimplifying it.
If you are running a business there are tonnes of ways to reduce your tax. ( ie Packer ).
If you are being paid $X for performing a job, it all comes down to legitimate business expenses. Mostly spelt out by the tax department and easy to Audit. Wouldn't be much scope for footy players I would think.
My brother is one of those accountants I was talking about. You are correct that it's very easy if you own a business, but it's still reasonably easy to dodge an insane amount of tax if you are just an employee.
"Player X Foundation for kids with cancer/any other cause" is one of the biggest ones.
Don't forget that many players own restaurants etc which just provides more options.
Not sure about the "foundation". You'd have to put in to write the tax off I think ( and I wouldn't want to play down some of the great charity footballers get involved with).
Fair comment about the restaurants etc though. However when they have shares in a business ( I know Nick Riewoldt has shares in a few pubs ) it gets harder to write down one person's taxable income.
Don't see Riewoldt missing from 13m out directly in front.
No, but I saw him miss from 20, 25, 30, 40 and 50 and it happens in every game, often with the oppo taking the ball down field and kicking a goal.Don't see Riewoldt missing from 13m out directly in front.