You answered your own question. In Pepsi we trust.This is the biggest surprise in Ken's 11 years. Maybe only surpassed by his switching to Pepsi Max this season - didn't see that coming.
It's so out of character. What's going on??
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You answered your own question. In Pepsi we trust.This is the biggest surprise in Ken's 11 years. Maybe only surpassed by his switching to Pepsi Max this season - didn't see that coming.
It's so out of character. What's going on??
More to do with Jones finding some rare form the last 1.5 weeks across the SANFL and AFL. No point doing anything to unsettle that.I applaud the call. Having said that, I thought against Melbourne in the wet was probably his best game of the year. Might be as much about match ups as anything...
Lycett has absolutely done his job the last couple weeks. Keeps this up and he wont be dropped. If he drops away then fair enough, but he shouldn't be dropped at the moment.I want to see Finlayson/Dixon main ruck and drop Lycett instead.
Basically ensures that we have 3 good forward talls at all times.
Yes, let's not kid ourselves. Because I'm sure the poor performances against Collingwood and Adelaide had nothing to do with the fact that we were smashed 98-155 in contested possession while pressure acts were 253-242 one week and the next week we recorded 124-146 in contested possessions while pressure acts were 276-256.Let's not kid ourselves, the whole plan changed after Tredrea made his comments.
Yes, let's not kid ourselves. Because I'm sure the poor performances against Collingwood and Adelaide had nothing to do with the fact that we were smashed 98-155 in contested possession while pressure acts were 253-242 one week and the next week we recorded 124-146 in contested possessions while pressure acts were 276-256.
You know what that says? It says that there were too many players standing around waiting for Collingwood/Adelaide players to get the ball and not getting to the secondary contest first. As soon as Butters went into the middle and we started resting Horne-Francis as deep forward and playing him in bursts in the middle, against Sydney we went 184-196 in contested possessions and 311-314. In other words, our contested possession differential to the opposition improved as our pressure differential decreased...instead of getting to the ball second, we started hunting with a bit more urgency and getting to the contest first.
High pressure numbers are only good if you're winning the contested ball as well.
Surely he has to learn our weird game plan firstThere are at least four players who have to pass fitness tests before their availability is known. We also do not know if Ken will rush Narkle into the AFL side. Too many variables so we wait and see.
Surely he has to learn our weird game plan first
What? Bomb it to charlie? Can’t be that hard.Surely he has to learn our weird game plan first
Even the most ignorant and blind Hinkley stooge has got to be able to draw a correlation between the post Rnd 3 reaction and the change that has followed.Yes and contested ball is about effort, intensity, hunger as much as anything. So what may have driven that change?
Finlayson took about 7 or 8 games to come goodYep. He missed two years of football and was in a basket case of a side last year so at least he's on the park and I see signs of him starting to get into the groove again.
Agreed. I think the whole Carr in charge is nonsense and a convenient way to set aside positives from the last 8 weeks.Even the most ignorant and blind Hinkley stooge has got to be able to draw a correlation between the post Rnd 3 reaction and the change that has followed.
I don't prescribe to the "Carr's now in charge philosophy", but something has happened. One of the most significant and clearest standout points for change is the reaction post round 3, and the overdue, completely deserved criticism that came at Ken. It seems to have triggered something, even if it is just that it has given the boys a purpose to rebel against. Who cares, whatever it is, it is working, and it isn't just on-field where the changes are clearly drastic.
What also has been really interesting since those two games is our combination of goals and behinds. Our goals and behinds combination since then has been higher than our oppositions goals and behinds. I don't think Tredrea can take credit for that.Yes, let's not kid ourselves. Because I'm sure the poor performances against Collingwood and Adelaide had nothing to do with the fact that we were smashed 98-155 in contested possession while pressure acts were 253-242 one week and the next week we recorded 124-146 in contested possessions while pressure acts were 276-256.
You know what that says? It says that there were too many players standing around waiting for Collingwood/Adelaide players to get the ball and not getting to the secondary contest first. As soon as Butters went into the middle and we started resting Horne-Francis as deep forward and playing him in bursts in the middle, against Sydney we went 184-196 in contested possessions and 311-314. In other words, our contested possession differential to the opposition improved as our pressure differential decreased...instead of getting to the ball second, we started hunting with a bit more urgency and getting to the contest first.
High pressure numbers are only good if you're winning the contested ball as well.
Wow, in a 9 game winning streak we have kicked more goals and behinds than our opposition. Mindblowing....What also has been really interesting since those two games is our combination of goals and behinds. Our goals and behinds combination since then has been higher than our oppositions goals and behinds. I don't think Tredrea can take credit for that.
It all adds up.Wow, in a 9 game winning streak we have kicked more goals and behinds than our opposition. Mindblowing....
i cant believe people are trying to convince themselves Hinkley is calling all these shots that he's never called before. some people just refuse to believe things right in front of their eyes until there's official news, a quote, an official press release confirming it for them. but they'll never get that, so this debate will rage on forever...