Unofficial Preview Changes v Bombers, Metricon Friday night.

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Geez. Just when Mcstay was coming good. Almost having a breakout year. 2 weeks was far too harsh. Some will disagree. But I don't care. Cant even remember the players name but he ducked all night and I mean ALLLLL night. Maybe if he tried standing after collecting the ball maybe Mcstay would of had someone to tackle. That flog pissed me off all night.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I wonder if Toby Wooller could be a left of centre replacement for Dan McStay.
Opportunity for someone to step up.
Lots have been asking fo this for a while, so now we will get to see how it looks. And who is truly next in line.
 
I think it would be hard to argue against careless and high because whilst it was 90% caused by Jetta he did chose to bump. Surely we can get it down to 1 game.
 
I think there will be changes, anyone feeling sore or overly fatigued will be managed, 3 games in 9 days from Friday.

Outs- Daniel Rich(inj), Tom Berry(Omit), Archie Smith(Omit).

Ins- Cam Ellis-Yolmen, Connor Ballenden, Alex Witherden.

Archie offers nothing unfortunately, Birchall may need a rest as well, if so Answerth in.
I like it, maybe add two more, Skinner for McStay (suspended??) and Payne for Lester.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

3 down to 2 with an early plea. Take it and be back for the Dogs game imo.
Hmm the 3 down to 2 with an early plea does make it risk but I would be confident of getting the impact down to low or medium. You cannot classify that as McStay making a high impact bump, Jetta made 90% the impact.
 
3 down to 2 with an early plea. Take it and be back for the Dogs game imo.

Actually scratch that, I don't think that is correct and I was confused from Fish's tweet. I'm pretty sure the old 3 weeks down to 2 with an early plea is gone and it is 2 regardless - it will just be expensive to challenge it.
 
Archie is just not up to it. Ballanden or Skinner for the ruck/forward as the McStay replacement. Oscar can handle the majority.

Witho is needed, IMO. Without both of Rich & Birchall, our new centre corridor game falls apart.

Another running player, leave it up to the panel who it is.
 
Actually scratch that, I don't think that is correct and I was confused from Fish's tweet. I'm pretty sure the old 3 weeks down to 2 with an early plea is gone and it is 2 regardless - it will just be expensive to challenge it.
Ah ok I hope so. Worth it imo. I assume it costs nothing if it gets overturned/decreased?
 
Actually scratch that, I don't think that is correct and I was confused from Fish's tweet. I'm pretty sure the old 3 weeks down to 2 with an early plea is gone and it is 2 regardless - it will just be expensive to challenge it.

Sorry for intruding, but yeah, its two weeks straight off the bat (not 3 down to 2)

1595837094018.png

I reckon Brisbane would be in their right to challenge it. I wouldn't have classed that as High Impact (unless there are some corresponding medical reports or something from Melb to counter this) considering that Jetta played out the game? I assumed it would have been graded Medium Impact
 
Sorry for intruding, but yeah, its two weeks straight off the bat (not 3 down to 2)

View attachment 920566

I reckon Brisbane would be in their right to challenge it. I wouldn't have classed that as High Impact (unless there are some corresponding medical reports or something from Melb to counter this) considering that Jetta played out the game? I assumed it would have been graded Medium Impact

On the radio Fagan was trying to avoid giving his opinion but seemed of the view that Jetta contributed to it significantly. So we may wish to challenge. However he did say that as a club struggling financially without the resources to undertake tribunal challenges unless for a very good reason we may make a call to just live with it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top