Rather neither.I’m not criticizing Strachan in his first game but he does seem to be a slow, lumbering tall. Himmelberg definitely more agile
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Rather neither.I’m not criticizing Strachan in his first game but he does seem to be a slow, lumbering tall. Himmelberg definitely more agile
He was the worst possible pick for the position.I’m not criticizing Strachan in his first game but he does seem to be a slow, lumbering tall. Himmelberg definitely more agile
Why name him as emergency?
How ridiculousAFL Covid protocols to enable him to do competitive work. Has to be named as part of the squad
I don't know how much SANFL you've watched but that's certainly not my take on Kieran Strachan vs Elliott Himmelberg re speed and athleticism. I truly don't think either are going to ever be quality AFL players but I reckon Strachan has shown at least that he really wants it more, Himmelberg I'm not sure that he does, if he does he's got an ordinary way of showing it.I’m not criticizing Strachan in his first game but he does seem to be a slow, lumbering tall. Himmelberg definitely more agile
How ridiculous
I don't know how much SANFL you've watched but that's certainly not my take on Kieran Strachan vs Elliott Himmelberg re speed and athleticism. I truly don't think either are going to ever be quality AFL players but I reckon Strachan has shown at least that he really wants it more, Himmelberg I'm not sure that he does, if he does he's got an ordinary way of showing it.
He did say that AFL protocols require us to name Fog as part of the squad in order to have him involved in competitive work
It's more of a sign of the AFL compromising everything just to playWell I think they’re trying to limit the number of people who can do contact during training so they need the names of those who are and those who aren’t. Seems reasonable to me
Cheers for that, makes sense nowAFL Covid protocols to enable him to do competitive work. Has to be named as part of the squad
We are ****ing the career of a promising player aren't we.yes I watched that but he is back pedalling - he said he needed to be in the 27 to train - Saunders or someone from AFC said Fog would play Wednesday against Melbourne - now Nicks states he is a few games away - even if he needed to be named in the 27 that means there were 4 guys in front of him that could have been named emergency!!!
Something isn't right.
More than oneWe are ******* the career of a promising player aren't we.
We are ******* the career of a promising player aren't we.
You get 3 groups of 9 in training, so have to name 27 guys you want to train.Then that's a joke.
If an injured player can't train with a group unless he's named as an emergency the AFL have stuffed themselves
So why name Fog in the 4 emergencies if he can't play - name him at 27 -it doesn't make sense particularly when the injury report from Thursday said he would play Wednesday night if not Saturday - someones talking sh%t!!You get 3 groups of 9 in training, so have to name 27 guys you want to train.
Exactly.You get 3 groups of 9 in training, so have to name 27 guys you want to train.
Polished ??Out: Nicks
In: My glistening nutsack
Pretty much. Grateful I didn't see the game.Who cares
Yep, they’ve completely contradicted themselves this week with Fog. He was apparently close to playing this week but wanted to hold off for the Melbourne game, now he won’t even play in that? This is looking like it will turn into a 10 week injury, wtf.yes I watched that but he is back pedalling - he said he needed to be in the 27 to train - Saunders or someone from AFC said Fog would play Wednesday against Melbourne - now Nicks states he is a few games away - even if he needed to be named in the 27 that means there were 4 guys in front of him that could have been named emergency!!!
Something isn't right.