List Mgmt. Contract, Trade and Draft Discussions - 2024 Post Season

Remove this Banner Ad

  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #2


Quick links:
Player contract status
Draft prospect video highlights (thanks to noobermensch)
AFL retirements and delistings



Latest news and rumours:


  • Zane Trew, Jamaine Jones and Jordyn Baker delisted

  • List Manager Matt Clarke appeared on Gettable - Click spoiler below for summary
    On the draft: "We predicted that the draft was strong, but it's probably gotten stronger during the year."

    On top end of draft: "You could probably make five or six different choices and get it right."

    On Pick 3: "I reckon there's five (players) around that mark."

    On splitting: "I think you want to hold an early selection if you can. The depth of this group allows you to maybe have some movement there, and see what you can do to bring in more talent in the first 20-25 picks. Easier said than done, and I think most clubs would be saying the same thing. We'll see what we can do."

    On Liam Baker: "He's still yet to make a decision. They're still weighing up a few things. We'd love to get Liam on board from what he offers from a talent and leadership point of view. We understand where we're at as a group, we're rebuilding our group, we need to add some guys in the middle tier to support our young group."

    On Jack Graham: "We've got a number of players that we're speaking to. A bit of a wait and see on that one as well. We'll talk to a number of guys."

    On Shai Bolton: "I think it will be difficult for anybody, really. He's heavily contracted and a high quality player."

    On James Peatling: "He's heavily involved in a finals series at the moment so I don't want to comment too much on it, but I think there's a number of guys that have been playing really good footy this year that could suit what we do and what other clubs do. He's taken his footy to another level this year."

    On Tom Barrass: "We've had an early discussion with Hawthorn about it, they understand where we're at. He's nominated Hawthorn as his ideal destination. We want what we think he's worth, as a genuine key back in the competition that can do what he can do. We're obviously mindful of getting an appropriate deal for West Coast."

    On Tom Clurey: "Maybe (note: sounded very non enthused). We'd probably need some key back depth, whether that's through the draft or trade and free agency."

    On Jack Darling: "We've had initial discussions with his management group about (moving). We're open to talking, as we are with all of our players, but Jack's contracted with us."

    On Liam Ryan: "I expect him to be at West Coast next year, yes." (The most definitive answer of the day by a mile, a non-starter of a talking point.)

    On out of contact players e.g. Rotham, Witherden, Jones: "We're still working through what it looks like from a list point of view, and how many selections we'll want to have, and players that may come in and potentially may go out. You might want to give a coach an opportunity to look at these guys."

    On Harley Reid: "We've had discussions most of the year with his management group. I think it sits in a really good place. We're open to doing really whatever they want to do to be honest. We're really confident in building the right system around Harley, on and off field, to make sure that he's really comfortable, that he's going to play his best footy, and his long term future."

    On Jake Waterman's new deal: "Yep, really close. We're working really closely with his management on that. I expect that we'll have something done pretty soon."

    On Oscar Allen: "We've been talking with Oscar and his manager most of the year on that one. We're going through some stuff at the moment. I think we'll be ok with that one."






 
Last edited by a moderator:
With respect to the Sunraysia Football and Netball League, he didn’t have the heart or drive to play football. Thought he’d made it the day he was drafted, didn’t do the work, didn’t have the ticker.
To be fair, that's worth about 19 games a season in our 2023 and 2024 teams.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I feel like whatever pick we get for Darling will be on traded to get Dev…

Works for me.

Shifting Darling and his salary off the books whilst adding a defensive mid with upside, in the prime footballing age we lack is a big win.

Improves depth, improves flexibility with salary cap, allows for more opportunity given to J.Williams and Reid.

Also good for North. Only one I don't think would be keen is Brisbane.
 
Quite often lately.

Venables - Dead (but was the real winner in the end.... IF you know what I mean)
Brander - Gone
Chesser - Ugh
Hewett - 😨 love him, but I've got no faith.


Ginbey projects as a solid selection at least. Thank god for that. Pick split would've looked atrocious if he wasn't.
lol expert level bedwetting here
 
It's very simple.

We trade Pick 2 + Darling to North Melbourne

In return we receive from North pick 3 + Darling immediately traded back to WCE + Hawks Pick 30
It's a bit of the "tails I win, heads you lose" type of wizardry that I'd love to see the club try more of.

I'd only accept it if North agreed to pay Darling's salary though.
 
How's he wrong?
He's not. It's facts. SpaceKent is just throwing shade after I laughed at his Harley melt.

It's what makes this board special. Tit for tat. Memes. Swinging dicks.
Writing off Chesser and Hewett as not working out after 3 and 2 (injury impacted) years respectively is a horrid take.

Same goes for the people complaining that we only came out of the 17 draft with Allen and Ryan and didn’t hit on literally all of our picks.
 
PommyinOz just released a phantom. He's not an ITK journo but does a lot of draft stuff.

He had us involved in a mega trade.

End result;
Hawks: Barrass, 60
Freo: Bolton, 24, 40
Tigers: 3,11,14
GCS: Rioli, 30,58
WC: Baker, 6,18,28,68

So basically
Out Barass, 3, 24, 60
In: Baker, 6, 18, 28, 68

Then had us drafting a sliding FOS at 8 (after Ashcroft and Lombardo bids), and Whitlock at 20.
 
Will Elijah Hewett ever actually play football?

Also stop saying Dev - like who cares?

And Rotham is so not worth talking about whether on our list or not. He succcckkkkkkkks
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

So basically
Out Barass, 3, 24, 60
In: Baker, 6, 18, 28, 68

Then had us drafting a sliding FOS at 8 (after Ashcroft and Lombardo bids), and Whitlock at 20.
ew

If we assume 6+18 for 3, then its Barrass+24+60 for Baker+28+68. Huge unders for us
Basically has Baker as worth more than Barrass

Very ew
 
Last edited:
PommyinOz just released a phantom. He's not an ITK journo but does a lot of draft stuff.

He had us involved in a mega trade.

End result;
Hawks: Barrass, 60
Freo: Bolton, 24, 40
Tigers: 3,11,14
GCS: Rioli, 30,58
WC: Baker, 6,18,28,68

So basically
Out Barass, 3, 24, 60
In: Baker, 6, 18, 28, 68

Then had us drafting a sliding FOS at 8 (after Ashcroft and Lombardo bids), and Whitlock at 20.
Let's say for the sake of argument that Baker is worth roughly 24 and Barrass is worth roughly 18 and 28.

That means we traded 3 and 60 for 6 and 68. Don't think I'll bother watching that mock.
 
PommyinOz just released a phantom. He's not an ITK journo but does a lot of draft stuff.

He had us involved in a mega trade.

End result;
Hawks: Barrass, 60
Freo: Bolton, 24, 40
Tigers: 3,11,14
GCS: Rioli, 30,58
WC: Baker, 6,18,28,68

So basically
Out Barass, 3, 24, 60
In: Baker, 6, 18, 28, 68

Then had us drafting a sliding FOS at 8 (after Ashcroft and Lombardo bids), and Whitlock at 20.
F**k that. Although FOS at 8 would be a steal.
 
PommyinOz just released a phantom. He's not an ITK journo but does a lot of draft stuff.

He had us involved in a mega trade.

End result;
Hawks: Barrass, 60
Freo: Bolton, 24, 40
Tigers: 3,11,14
GCS: Rioli, 30,58
WC: Baker, 6,18,28,68

So basically
Out Barass, 3, 24, 60
In: Baker, 6, 18, 28, 68

Then had us drafting a sliding FOS at 8 (after Ashcroft and Lombardo bids), and Whitlock at 20.
Would rather keep 3 and trade Barrass to Hawks for pick13 and F1st.

If Suns want 3 I'm sure we can do better directly for 6 and 12 etc
 
Matt Kennedy told he’s free to look for another club. Would he move West after a new addition ti the family. Free to look means he would come cheaper. Carroll staying?

I hope we've at least been in contact with his management.

On SM-S921B using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Matt Kennedy told he’s free to look for another club. Would he move West after a new addition ti the family. Free to look means he would come cheaper. Carroll staying?


Id have him up there with Peatling on guys id want to recruit.
Big bodied mid who can play a defensive role and do a multitude of different roles if required, ideal to have in a young side who is still finding where players fit

Kennedy + Peatling would be amazing
 
Id have him up there with Peatling on guys id want to recruit.
Big bodied mid who can play a defensive role and do a multitude of different roles if required, ideal to have in a young side who is still finding where players fit

Kennedy + Peatling would be amazing
Just read he is from the same country town and played junior footy with Perryman.

Perryman (Free) + Peatling + Kennedy (cheap trade)
 
PommyinOz just released a phantom. He's not an ITK journo but does a lot of draft stuff.

He had us involved in a mega trade.

End result;
Hawks: Barrass, 60
Freo: Bolton, 24, 40
Tigers: 3,11,14
GCS: Rioli, 30,58
WC: Baker, 6,18,28,68

So basically
Out Barass, 3, 24, 60
In: Baker, 6, 18, 28, 68

Then had us drafting a sliding FOS at 8 (after Ashcroft and Lombardo bids), and Whitlock at 20.

That trade effectively slides 3, 13 AND 23 to fit Baker in for free. I get the logic but surely we can do better than that. I would hope that any potential split for pick 3 generates an extra first rounder rather than just freeing up space for a player. I still hope we can get Baker for our F2 so we're able to use our draft picks this year.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. Contract, Trade and Draft Discussions - 2024 Post Season

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top