List Mgmt. Contract, Trade and Draft Discussions - 2024 Post Season

Whose future picks would you have preferred?


  • Total voters
    216

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #2


Quick links



Trade period
In:
12, F1, F2, F3, 73, Baker, Owies, Graham*
Out: 3, 63, F4, Barrass, Darling

*Free agent

Done deals

  • Jai Culley, Alex Witherden and Coby Burgiel delisted






  • Zane Trew, Jamaine Jones and Jordyn Baker delisted

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It manifestly is.

"it is peoples jobs to recruit for the club, us on here just have an opinion on what we see."

That's just a blank appeal to authority. Yeah they're paid to do it, so what? It's the deliverances of expert knowledge vs silly layman opinion?

Obviously there's a kind of idealistic or impractical mob-think that the fanbase can be prone to, and no one thinks club decisions should be somehow democratic, but I wonder how the relevant people would feel about pretty much everyone being totally dismayed with their conduct.
Nothing expert about trading #14 for Baker, and trading Barrass for #14 and little else.
 
What is that being based on. Vic media nuffies?

Will keep the powder (nappies) dry until we see the full deal.

14 for Baker? I think that's very close to happening after the Barrass deal.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Not draft/trade related but on Trade Radio atm.

Discussion with Ben Brown is great - intelligent without the usual footy euphamisms.
 
Remember when we all thought a new list manager would put behind us the days of being soft at the trade table?

No more Pie man, no more crazy Vozzo.

Surely things will be different.

We’re all idiots, at least now I can brace myself and deal with it. I just wish I was wearing knee pads today. 🤣

Peeing Episode 4 GIF by Curb Your Enthusiasm
 
Trade week update:
WCE- yet to see any movement on either the Barrass trade or the Baker trade however the BF board is sending out a flood warning as they need to release 2 dam gates as the level of piss is threatening to cause a catestrophic dam wall failure without a release. Authorities are concerned the gates wont be able to deal with the catchment deluge when a deal does get done.
Residents are advised to evacuate the state if able to do so.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

pantskyle

Back in August you said:

"If we essentially swap Barrass for Baker we're at the bottom for the next decade. That's squad killing moves."

Now you seem OK with Barrass for Baker + steak knives.

What's changed?

Coming to terms with it happening, doing more research into the player and how he is viewed outside of my own bubble, seeing that potentially pick 24 is coming back with him.

First pick on night 2 of the draft could be sold for a kings ransom.
 
We can all have our own opinions on players and drafts but at the end of the day we get no say, I've long since gotten over getting worked up over trades and drafts.

I've had one recruiter tell me we should consider ourselves lucky that such a good player in Baker wants to play for us, going by a lot of opinions here we're mad to even be considering him.

Nothings ever going to be universally accepted unless it is H.Reid pick 1.
Putting aside opinions on the specifics of players and drafts, trading a contracted key position player for an uncontracted half forward is objectively bad.

Just because they are two separate deals that achieve this outcome doesn't change that.

I understand there's probably not an easy solution, but this is what the experts get paid for.

We shouldn't have made any promises to Baker without a caveat that we would only trade if we are getting fair value and ensure he was comfortable rolling the dice on the draft if that couldn't be achieved.

On SM-A556E using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Last edited:
Putting aside opinions on the specifics of players and drafts, trading a contracted key position player for an uncontracted player is objectively bad.

Just because they are two separate deals that achieve this outcome doesn't change that.

I understand there's probably not an easy solution, but this is what the experts get paid for.

We shouldn't have made any promises to Baker without a caveat that we would only trade if we are getting fair value and ensure he was comfortable rolling the dice on the draft if that couldn't be achieved.

On SM-A556E using BigFooty.com mobile app

I think we just wait to see what the final trade is.

Baker and 24 for 14 good
Baker for 14 bad
 
I'm kind of hoping the Bolton, Rioli, Baker trade talks are just clubs taking the piss with Richmond, and that they all pull out of the deals leaving Richmond with no picks, and disgruntled players that took them to :checks notes: the wooden spoon :checks notes:

Pay back for the premierships and just generally being arseholes.
 
Trade week update:
WCE- yet to see any movement on either the Barrass trade or the Baker trade however the BF board is sending out a flood warning as they need to release 2 dam gates as the level of piss is threatening to cause a catestrophic dam wall failure without a release. Authorities are concerned the gates wont be able to deal with the catchment deluge when a deal does get done.
Residents are advised to evacuate the state if able to do so.
We have a Water Corp Eagles member here!
WA is so dry that the water from the dam is not sufficient to reach Victoria Park nor the Eagles Head Quarter.
 
The Rioli talk is amazing. There's a direct peer who is the same age, same contract length, same position, but a better player across the board, who is up for trade in Houston, and the disconnect on what people are talking about as their trade value is just amazing.
It's because Gold Coast simply don't value high draft picks the same way other clubs do, due to their academy.
 
How are Richmond able to demand #6 and #13 for Rioli and Collingwood #13 for Noble and we can’t do much better than #14 for Barrass?

What is wrong with our club, we are so weak. This is a reason why we are in the hole that we are in.
Maybe Worsfold can help.
Absolutely agree...

And this on top of leaving our defence with a massive hole with no cover(hedwards not at all proven)
 
Geelong didnt trade Kelly and treat him like a human . They got the picks that got them Cameron and a premiership .
We’ve already established that Geelong are hard ass campaigners but that every other fan base thinks their list management team is the softest and weakest in footy.

Some serious SuperCoach/FIFA manager mode headspace in this thread.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top