Deaneus!
We Await Silent Tristero's Empire
Lol this the weakest troll I’ve ever seen.
I'm glad we nipped it in the bud before it could have gotten any worse
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lol this the weakest troll I’ve ever seen.
I see Carlton is playing 3D chess whilst the competition is playing checkers.
What'd I miss?I'm glad we nipped it in the bud before it could have gotten any worse
What'd I miss?
Actually, the bigger reason we got caned for draft tampering is we put it in writing that we would trade Tiprat to his club of choice (I think**) at an undervalue (a 2nd round pick), which is unfair to all other clubs - ie this damages the integrity of the draftYou're allowed to trade Kurt Tippett to Sydney for a 2nd round pick, but planning to do it and putting it in writing will get you in the ****. ...
And simultaneously forgetting how to read.Carlton people learning to spell
They would have not signed Zac Smith, Scott Selwood, Bartel and Enright and would have offered Dangerfield $3.6m over 3 years, which we had no chance of matching.Ok but he was never going to leave as a free agent because we were always going to match Geelong's offer of 800k a year for 4 years which means Geelong would have to trade for him anyway. Everyone knew this, so we just went straight to the trade table, we had the upper hand, we should of demanded 2 firsts, I dont care they wanted one to go to carlton for Henderson. They wanted and needed Danger more and they would have paid it if we held out longer.
Agree on that, who care if they "promised" the future 1st to Carlton first.Ok but he was never going to leave as a free agent because we were always going to match Geelong's offer of 800k a year for 4 years which means Geelong would have to trade for him anyway. Everyone knew this, so we just went straight to the trade table, we had the upper hand, we should of demanded 2 firsts, I dont care they wanted one to go to carlton for Henderson. They wanted and needed Danger more and they would have paid it if we held out longer.
Brandon Ellis: The Blues could take advantage of Ellis' contract situation, given he's one of just three restricted free agents in the League. He has won plenty of the footy in an impressive spell of form since returning from the fringes of the Tigers' best team.
Tom Cutler: In a similar sense to Ellis, could Cutler provide the Blues with some dash out of defence? They've desperately lacked speed off half-back and Cutler has that. He's played only three games for the Lions this year and fits the age profile.
Top-30 draft pick: The Blues have given the Crows their first pick and the Giants their second. Although they have Adelaide's opening pick (currently No.12), they'll have a gap between that and their next (currently No.37). Another top-30 selection would be handy.
Matthew Kreuzer: It seems unlikely, but Kreuzer would be Carlton's most valuable trade chip if it wants to get back into the draft. He's uncontracted beyond this year and the club has capable deputies in Andrew Phillips and Matthew Lobbe in reserve.
Jack Silvagni: After a rough start to the season, Silvagni has recently reclaimed his place in Carlton's side. But could he still find suitors at the end of the year? He's a good size and has natural talent, which could endear itself to a rival team.
Levi Casboult: The Blues tested the waters unsuccessfully in attempting to trade Casboult last year, but could try again midway through the current campaign. He's shown glimpses that he could be turned into a capable intercept defender with his marking abilities.
I am sure he would have said whoever picks me in the preseason draft, I will sit out the entire year.And he wouldn’t have gotten to Geelong
A lot of players have improved under Clarkson that he got from other clubs, just look at Henderson development in the last few years under him, even Impey looks better at the Hawks. I have no doubt Gunston would have developed into a good player if he stayed as our player development is excellent but the facts is it isn't better as the Hawks under Clarkson.It was always evident in his games with us that he was smart, skilled and mobile. It wasn’t a case of Clarkson waving a magic wand.
The AFL knows all contract lengths and the status of everyone's salary caps. There would be no bullshitting or bluffing with this. They'd put an offer to him and we'd not have the ability to say that we could match it.We had the option to match but you can't bluff it, you actually have to be able to and willing to offer the contract for the player to stay and we wouldn't have been willing or able to go up to what Dangerfield + Henderson's contract would be. If we did Danger would have been a big chance to accept it on a 1-year deal to try again a year later, which would have ****** our list as we would have lost other players we resigned after he left.
Player's contracts get restructured all the time, there are no rules that I am aware of that a free agent can't later restructure their contract.
You're right. Since Luke Ball, it's been the rule that clubs couldn't drastically renegotiate contracts signed by free agents.If that was the case, if for example Grundy wanted to come to us next year, we could beat any Pies offer and then restructure it afterwards. Im no expert on this, but to my understanding you cant change the dollar amount of the FA contract. I could be wrong.
If Danger had stayed for a year. He would have been a part of our 2017 season. Hmmmmm. I think the collateral fallout would have been we would have lost Jenkins at the end of 2017. He was one of the players we offered a big contract too. We also may have not traded for Gibbs.
His field kicking is actually okay, McGovern's done more kick clangers than him.Casboult an intercept defender? No one needs an intercept defender who kicks the ball to opposition forwards.
Mason Wood likes Casboult's field kicking too.His field kicking is actually okay, McGovern's done more kick clangers than him.
Silvagni. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha he's played the same amount of games as Wayne Milera. Who would you rather have?
I always wonder about this. I forget, was he able to nominate a salary in that scenario? I think he was, right?
Would other clubs have really taken him at close to a million dollars a year, knowing full well that he would have been pissed at them for doing it?
It would be one hell of a ballsy move. Not sure it would have really happened.
I am sure he would have said whoever picks me in the preseason draft, I will sit out the entire year.
I am sure he would have said whoever picks me in the preseason draft, I will sit out the entire year.
I do recall something along those lines being said at the time. Maybe from his manager?
But there is no way Dangerfield's ego could sit for a year on the sidelines.
Did you not see that kick directly to an opposition forward sitting inside 50 on his own ?? His field kicking might be okay, it's not great, but his decision making is horrendous.His field kicking is actually okay, McGovern's done more kick clangers than him.
We certainly don’t need anymore.Casboult an intercept defender? No one needs an intercept defender who kicks the ball to opposition forwards.
Well to be fair we had Swann & Inke before him, remember them going on about what a great job those masterminds were doing.
That was cult like as well "In Swann & Inke We Trust".
Will they never learn.