I have no insight into his availability or inclination to coach at the top level again, but geez I’d love to get someone like Choco in the top job. Guy is a master at this game.
-
LIVE: Sydney v Brisbane Lions - 2:30PM AEST Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 61% chance -- What's your tip? -- Ticketing Buy, Sell -- Teams on Thurs »
-
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Grand Final
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Round PF Winner: Still Me
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Autopsy Freo outclassed by the Crows
- Thread starter Van_Dyke
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Yep. If it’s 2 years and then Director of Coaching. Or just Director of Coaching.
If we do go down the road of sacking etc I would like to get Dunstall and someone astute in the media to review the Coaching department and help select the new coach.
Stop with the Freo boys club. It’s nonsense. Remember Vossy opting out of an interview when he saw who was selecting the coach…Former Freo people.
Also hate to say it but David King has made some valid points regarding our gameplan……maybe we get him on board to review. Seriously why not. He is on point about us and our coach. Again I hate to admit it.
- May 26, 2014
- 903
- 1,155
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
You mean the guy responsible for the most dysfunctional part of our team?
On Pixel 7 Pro using BigFooty.com mobile app
David flipping King? Even you've outdone yourself here. And to think I'd heard it all the last 2 days. Can see how you'd like his over reactions and drama though. Betting scandals, drink driving & running from a car crash, his hugs and excuses for Gaff's punch on Brayshaw. I can't stand him. Hypocritical shock jock and just another of the VFL boy's club.
On Pixel 4a using BigFooty.com mobile app
Last edited:
- May 3, 2007
- 38,751
- 22,597
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Man City, Valencia, Lazio, Panthers
Yep but I am certain it included the dockers AFLW side too
What interests me is all this commentary on 'building connection' between team mates, and 'guys going insular'.
Two years ago, going by the club's own accounts and media postings, I saw a team that was very tight together, where players were welcoming each other in board, training together, urging each other on, and whom had all bought in entirely.
That is NOT the team I saw before me in the last four games.
It's got me wondering ....
What the fcuk has changed internally in the interim? Where has that abundant cohesion and buy-in gone?
The biggest changes I personally can point to from an outside perspective, which might have affected team morale or self belief are:
Players are also seemingly "focussed on last year", and they need to stop...
What EXACTLY about last year, are they still focussed on?
Is that another way of saying they are missing the people who left?
Because on the face of it, we lost more quality than we got in. Jackson is good, but he's still one man, who can only play in one spot at a time.
What sparked all that personnel to leave? With lobb it was greed, with meek it was opportunity, with logue it was money and opportunity, with tucker it was opportunity, with acres it was security and opportunity.
Or at least that's the way it seemed
I note that out of all the players we lost, lobby was the only one who wanted to go.
The rest wanted to stay.
...but they weren't getting a shot. They were robbed of opportunity, and opportunity is what JL has been promising all the players since he arrived.
We traded the farm however to get Jackson, and he has been gifted a role in the starting lineup. Ditto with JOM.
Was it these trades that made a lie of the club's promise to it's players, to give everyone on its current list an opportunity if they were good enough? Or did that just expose a lie?
Or am I way off entirely?
Is disillusionment the problem? Is feeding spin to the players the problem?
Is selling out the problem?
I ask, because I honestly don't know, and I don't believe the stuff I'm being told by Jlo so far. It smells distressingly of bullshit at this point.
What the fcuk happened to undermine the magnificent cohesion, team spirit and self belief the whole playing group had in spades just nine months ago??
I honestly can't say for sure yet... But something quite tangible to the team's success and team's faith in itself seems to have changed.
We need to find it, and fix it. Or I suspect this team will not start performing like it should ....for quite some time to come.
Without cohesion, we won't succeed, or retain the talent we have attracted.
Without equal opportunity, all the clubs promises of reward for effort will ring hollow, and talent will start to scatter on the winds once again.
This team is nowhere as tight as it used to be. And is nowhere near as tight as the teams it is playing against.
So I say again...
...what the fcuk happened?
Two years ago, going by the club's own accounts and media postings, I saw a team that was very tight together, where players were welcoming each other in board, training together, urging each other on, and whom had all bought in entirely.
That is NOT the team I saw before me in the last four games.
It's got me wondering ....
What the fcuk has changed internally in the interim? Where has that abundant cohesion and buy-in gone?
The biggest changes I personally can point to from an outside perspective, which might have affected team morale or self belief are:
- mundy leaving
- Jackson coming
- JOM coming
- Logue, acres, tucker, Lob and Meek leaving,
- drafting a massive bunch of second string forwards (no offence, but none of them have impressed me much yet)
- josh Carr leaving
Players are also seemingly "focussed on last year", and they need to stop...
What EXACTLY about last year, are they still focussed on?
Is that another way of saying they are missing the people who left?
Because on the face of it, we lost more quality than we got in. Jackson is good, but he's still one man, who can only play in one spot at a time.
What sparked all that personnel to leave? With lobb it was greed, with meek it was opportunity, with logue it was money and opportunity, with tucker it was opportunity, with acres it was security and opportunity.
Or at least that's the way it seemed
I note that out of all the players we lost, lobby was the only one who wanted to go.
The rest wanted to stay.
...but they weren't getting a shot. They were robbed of opportunity, and opportunity is what JL has been promising all the players since he arrived.
We traded the farm however to get Jackson, and he has been gifted a role in the starting lineup. Ditto with JOM.
Was it these trades that made a lie of the club's promise to it's players, to give everyone on its current list an opportunity if they were good enough? Or did that just expose a lie?
Or am I way off entirely?
Is disillusionment the problem? Is feeding spin to the players the problem?
Is selling out the problem?
I ask, because I honestly don't know, and I don't believe the stuff I'm being told by Jlo so far. It smells distressingly of bullshit at this point.
What the fcuk happened to undermine the magnificent cohesion, team spirit and self belief the whole playing group had in spades just nine months ago??
I honestly can't say for sure yet... But something quite tangible to the team's success and team's faith in itself seems to have changed.
We need to find it, and fix it. Or I suspect this team will not start performing like it should ....for quite some time to come.
Without cohesion, we won't succeed, or retain the talent we have attracted.
Without equal opportunity, all the clubs promises of reward for effort will ring hollow, and talent will start to scatter on the winds once again.
This team is nowhere as tight as it used to be. And is nowhere near as tight as the teams it is playing against.
So I say again...
...what the fcuk happened?
Last edited:
Trading away so many players would definitely play a part. Especially guys like Logue and Acres who were big club men that everyone liked.
The amount of turnover we've had is quite large. Turnover always causes disruption of varying levels, especially for a young team who don't have oodles of experience to call upon.
The turnover we've had is in some big structural areas to the way we play, so it's not surprising there are issues with connection and cohesion on the field.
How long that takes to gel, who knows, there are many variables.
Well Acres, Tucker and Logue all requested trades so I am not convinced that they "wanted to stay" for whatever reasons known to them.
I would debate the "werent given a shot" and "robbed of opportunities".....Acres and Logue played 20 games last year. Tucker played 14. Meek was given a few games, but it was always going to be hard for him to establish himself in the side with Darcy the preferred first ruck.
I dont think lack of opportunity for Logue, Acres and Tucker was the motivating force....
If logue, acres and Tucker had of stayed, do you think that they would not be playing this season?
- Jul 20, 2014
- 8,194
- 18,416
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
No it doesn't. It was a flag for the men's and women's teams, and three prelims.
I don't honestly know. Possibly they may be. Logue tucker and acres all spoke highly of the club after they left, and praised the internal culture, saying it made it hard to leave, which is what prompted my comments.
My concern is more the general lack of cohesion that seems to be occurring along with this supposed preoccupation / infatuation / whatever one wants to call it... with the results of last year. Surely the messaging over the need for continued effort and constant improvement at the team and individual level has not changed... so why then these references to preoccupation with the past?
. I am not saying that the personal departures I mentioned were cause to any effect.
I am saying it the team's collective psyche seems to have shifted in some fashion, and I am merely looking for the cause.
I hope they didnt get carried away with their own hype...JLo included.
- Sep 27, 2013
- 3,281
- 5,288
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Philadelpia 76'ers
Logue sees himself as a very good backman and we made him sacrifice this and forced him to play in our dysfunctional forward line. We would have been better off trialling Chapman, Clarke or Young further up the ground to fit him into his natural position.
We didn't make him sacrifice it in any sort of permanent way. A preseason could have had him back in his favoured position. The money and being treated all special by a club looking to poach him had him out the door.
- Jul 20, 2014
- 8,194
- 18,416
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Logue asked for a contract extension with us at the start of 2022 for much less than north ended up giving him and got rebuffed. It was a complete list management **** up by the club, end of story
Yes Gav. I understand you've been bashing me around the ears waiting for your 'told your so' moment. No offence, but you sound like a petulant child.
Yes, the club has made mistakes. Yes we expected better.
Feel free to jump off. We will be fine without you.
Just re-watched the second half after i had cooled down a bit .I thought it could have ended up differently had that kick from Henry gone through (the crows player pulled one out of his arse to get that backside of his boot on it) would have got the margin back to 3 goals with plenty of time on the clock.Adelaide got some freaky goals after that and it was all over.Tipping the boys to bounce back on Friday.Bring in Brodie and Sturt and have a real hot crack .Things can turn around quickly but just got to sort out that forward line .
King Huskii
Norm Smith Medallist
- Apr 19, 2022
- 7,873
- 11,717
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
That's a monumental **** up. I remember that. If Cox or Pearce is injured we are even more ****ed now.
That's sack able
What really passes me off is when people say everyone who.leaves is a spud. Neither Logue or Acres where playing as spuds last year. Logue was put out of position and Arcres was our best wing
He’s probably had a better season so far than either of our key defenders too
royale with cheese
Abnormal
- Mar 19, 2023
- 1,351
- 1,813
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Banned
- #395
We’ve been no worse than Essendon and they got Brad Scott, doing ok this year.
St Kilda re-signed Ratten mid last year, then sacked him a couple months later. Everyone laughed at their incompetence at handling coaches. Now they’re flying with Lyon.
If there’s no one good available at the end of the year, we should keep Longmuir and bolster the football department. Better assistants, a director of coaching like Balme / Choco if we can get one. If we do neither then the board should consider a full clean out from Bell down in 2024 if we continue being mediocre.
Yep. Even last season I thought that we are one or 2 injuries to key backs away from a disaster. Nothing has changed in that regard.
When you build a side around an awesome defense with very little in terms of depth, you are playing cross your fingers.
royale with cheese
Abnormal
- Mar 19, 2023
- 1,351
- 1,813
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Banned
- #397
Sounds like Bell went to the Adrian Dodoro school of list management.
King Huskii
Norm Smith Medallist
- Apr 19, 2022
- 7,873
- 11,717
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Logue was that necessary insurance
Pick 21 this draft could be anything good or bad
NFI why we had to hand over this year's first on top of last year's first and second round picks for an uncontracted Jackson when no other teams were bidding as he only wanted Freo.
We will miss out on a much needed top 4 pick at the rate we are going. Something that could fill a list need such as another quality kpf to help Amiss in the future as Tabs is close to delisting
****ing hell Henry is never getting dropped is he
Similar threads
