Pure_Ownage
TheBrownDog
Guthrie and Menegola didn't step up when needed.
My point was more that they can physically take on load and protect our kids while they grow into afl but we need the next gen midfield group to surpass them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Guthrie and Menegola didn't step up when needed.
We need Knevitt badly.
I'm telling ya, those Norman surnames and that facial phenotype, he will be a gun.
Ablett Snr
Ablett Jnr
Paddy Pimblett, UFC
Mitch Knevitt
All guns, all similar in the head
My point was more that they can physically take on load and protect our kids while they grow into afl but we need the next gen midfield group to surpass them.
So you add draftees in place of half of then what? Rebuilding the list takes the andCompare to Geelong we would close to 10 or so players from the preliminary final we traded in...
Yeah, we do.
We aren't going to do it with our current list.
We need 3 years of top end draft picks now... I wouldn't top up unless absolutely necessary, and should be avoided. We top up starting in 3 years time I reckon, and I think Scotty needs to go after 2022.Yes and no. I think holmes will be a star and he is already on our list. But we need to draft more of him.
Asking people like Dangerfield, Cameron, Stewart,Hawkins
You only get top end draft picks by being putrid.We need 3 years of top end draft picks now... I wouldn't top up unless absolutely necessary, and should be avoided. We top up starting in 3 years time I reckon, and I think Scotty needs to go after 2022.
Nah, I reckon we just skip the first pick and go straight to the second.Should get someone other than Wells to pick under #20 (and ruckmen)
It would be unpopular because it would be a bad move.Thinking about Melbourne, Simon Goodwin won a flag as a player, good to have a coach who has done the same as either a player or coach.
Chris Scott has done both, but something is missing with him as a coach.
If we go full rebuild , we need to trade out players for picks. Asking people like Dangerfield, Cameron, Stewart,Hawkins if they want to be traded would not be popular, but who else has any value.
Trade out the first pick you mean?Nah, I reckon we just skip the first pick and go straight to the second.
We need Knevitt badly.
I'm telling ya, those Norman surnames and that facial phenotype, he will be a gun.
Ablett Snr
Ablett Jnr
Paddy Pimblett, UFC
Mitch Knevitt
All guns, all similar in the head
May, Lever, Brown, Hibberd, Langdon, Melkshamn & Tomlinson all started their careers elsewhere
I would say look at North Melbourne as an example of what not to do. Delisting a good player like Brent Harvey who has already won a flag rather than trading Robbie Tarrant in 2016 who they now lose for almost no compensation ( I am not suggesting an absurd strategy like what North did, more like what Hawthorn did in trading out Hay, Thompson to go 2 steps back, then 5 forward).This is why suggestions of a rebuild starting now are laughable. You dont trade any of those players, regardless of their value, and no club would ever do it.
Thinking about Melbourne, Simon Goodwin won a flag as a player, good to have a coach who has done the same as either a player or coach.
Chris Scott has done both, but something is missing with him as a coach.
If we go full rebuild , we need to trade out players for picks. Asking people like Dangerfield, Cameron, Stewart,Hawkins if they want to be traded would not be popular, but who else has any value.
I was just being silly as you always technically have a first pick.Trade out the first pick you mean?
Indeed, given that they're not likely to be contributing next year and that the average draftee taken in that kind of range plays maybe 50 games at most, there's a reasonable possibility they aren't in our next contending side either.I would say look at North Melbourne as an example of what not to do. Delisting a good player like Brent Harvey who has already won a flag rather than trading Robbie Tarrant in 2016 who they now lose for almost no compensation.
If we just draft 4 players in the low 30's, hopefully they turn out to be good players, but they will have little chance of contributing to a flag next year ( like collingwoods supposed great draft hand last year).
What suggestions do you have for us to be any chance in the next 5 years.
Yeah, I think our success with late picks is more us having a structure we could drop role players in with simple, well defined objectives.I was just being silly as you always technically have a first pick.
But perhaps you are on to something. The first round trades we did were not too bad, we got Hendo, Dangers (okay 2 picks) and Tuohy. But I'd only do them to top up a team the way the grand finalists did, not to form the nucleus of it unless its a weak draft.
JC coming along last year was probably bad timing for us. Awesome player, but think what we would have done with those three R1 picks. Two good players out of three could have formed the nucleus of our next premiership team.
This is definitely a fair point, and should really be included in any conversation when it comes to the sheer talent differential between our two sides.You mean a team chockers full of first round draft picks, cause they tanked for so long?
I would say look at North Melbourne as an example of what not to do. Delisting a good player like Brent Harvey who has already won a flag rather than trading Robbie Tarrant in 2016 who they now lose for almost no compensation ( I am not suggesting an absurd strategy like what North did, more like what Hawthorn did in trading out Hay, Thompson to go 2 steps back, then 5 forward).
If we just draft 4 players in the low 30's, hopefully they turn out to be good players, but they will have little chance of contributing to a flag next year ( like collingwoods supposed great draft hand last year).
What suggestions do you have for us to be any chance in the next 5 years.
You mean a team chockers full of first round draft picks, cause they tanked for so long?
This is definitely a fair point, and should really be included in any conversation when it comes to the sheer talent differential between our two sides.
This is a breakdown of all their first and second round picks:
Pick 2 - Christian Petracca
Pick 3 - Clayton Oliver
Pick 3 - Christian Salem
Pick 3 - Luke Jackson
Pick 3 - Angus Brayshaw
Pick 12 - Kysaiah Pickett
Pick 14 (traded in) - Jake Lever
Pick 21 - Jake Bowey
Pick 26 (F/S) - Jack Viney
Pick 28 - Tom Sparrow
Pick 29 - Charlie Spargo
Pick 31 - Bayley Fritsch
Pick 32 - Trent Rivers
Pick 33 - James Jordon (sub)
Pick 34 - Max Gawn
Pick 37 - Harrison Petty
***************
16/23 players all first and second round draft picks, with 7 first round draft picks (1 traded in) and 5 Top 10 draft picks, amongst them. Only Brown, Langdon, Neal-Bullen, May, McDonald, Hibberd and Harmes (7/23 players), as draft picks from the 3rd round onwards.
They deserve every single accolade this season, and were phenomenal during the finals, but it's hard to argue that they haven't been blessed with a metric sh*t ton of talent to get them there