Maybe this question has already been asked or is out-of-place given our circumstances/salary cap, BUT:
Why didn’t Geelong make a play for Grundy after the 2023 season?
Why didn’t Geelong make a play for Grundy after the 2023 season?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He didn’t want to come here and he was too expensive when we have Conway in the wingsMaybe this question has already been asked or is out-of-place given our circumstances/salary cap, BUT:
Why didn’t Geelong make a play for Grundy after the 2023 season?
I didn’t follow the pre-season trade news closely. Too expensive? For an excellent ruck who could give us one of the things we need right now?He didn’t want to come here and he was too expensive when we have Conway in the wings
Pretty easy to grasp I would had thought
25 years old.
198cm point of difference.
Wins contested ball and clearances.
Tackles hard.
Is Irish and athletic for size.
Is a Free Agent.
Potential Blitz replacement.
I didn’t follow the pre-season trade news closely. Too expensive? For an excellent ruck who could give us one of the things we need right now?
... whats your opinion we would have to cough up for Smith?
Bradtke has had a couple of years development at Richmond plus a couple of years in our VFL side.
We could afford grundy and we chased him both when he moved to melb and sydney but he and/or his mrs didnt want to live in geelong. They are hipsters and both wanted to live in big cities.
Next question... Who retires and gets delisted in your opinion. Then who do you think the club will delist and retire players
He was only at richmond for 12 months and this is bradtkes first year with us.
I think foster has some skills but he cant survive on about 4 touches a game.
If he doesnt lift i think hes gone.
Coffee culture first
Football team second
I reckon the skills get him 12 more months on the list. He's a bizarre mix of being utterly anonymous but then the rare times he gets near it he shows real class.
Word is we talked to him and he wasn't interested.I didn’t follow the pre-season trade news closely. Too expensive? For an excellent ruck who could give us one of the things we need right now?
From what I've heard the Grundy talks never got anywhere. He wasn't interested and even if he was I'm not sure we were undecided given the hit to the salary cap.
Goldstein is the one we've gone hard for multiple times but unfortunately he never wanted to move out of Melbourne. Which is a pity because the timeline to transition from Goldstein to Conway would be perfect.
I would offer for Bronny to secure lebron. Will adapt to footy and suits our age demographicMore chance of getting LeBron out of the Lakers
From memory he got drafted off having a good U18 championship series playing in the ruck. Must have a better tank than he has shown so far?I agree that at times he shows class but you cant survive on his level of performance.
If he gets 1 year its literally because we are struggling to get any decent FA in to fill the spot.
On performance he would go.
The 100% players that will hang up there boots areHawkins Stanley and Tuohy will all willingly retire.
Bews and rohan will be forced to retire.
Danger will stay on next year and duncan is 50/50.
Parfitt i assume will exercise his FA rights and go.
So thats 6 changes (if duncan stays)
If i had to guess id say willis and jeka get 1 more year and hardie murdoch and foster all get delisted.
Clohesy is a certain keep and furphy we probably hang onto unless a better cat b comes up.
Thats probably enough changes unless we bring in a few FAs.
The interesting one is mannagh-if we dont play him in the run home id be asking for a trade to another vic club if i was him (unless we essentially guarantee him a b22 spot next year as he doesnt have time to wait)
Carlton and essendon would be the sort of clubs likely keen on a player like him.
Yep when he gets the pill Foster has the goods, just doesn't get it enoughHe was only at richmond for 12 months and this is bradtkes first year with us.
I think foster has some skills but he cant survive on about 4 touches a game.
If he doesnt lift i think hes gone.
No current season stats available
I don't know if Duncan has anything left in the tank. If you add him I have 7 players with games experience on my list of outsI can't see Tomahawk going on, he got the record and there's not much else for him to do.
2E looks to be winding down, Stanley is on his last legs and only came back because the club asked him to while we got Conway ready for AFL level footy. Rohan can barely make the side, Bews lives in the VFL.
That's 5 blokes right there i can see walking at seasons end.
Danger and Duncan probably have a year or two left in them so they stay, i can see Duncan next year being 2E this year.
In and out of the side.
Parfitt will most likely go and explore options with another club so there's 6.
I think the real question isn't who is going...it's who we replace them with?
I mean Mannagh, Knevitt, COS and Clohesy have all had a taste. Lawson Humphries should be getting games IMMEDIATELY.
He's the exact sort of defensive small we've been missing without Bews in the side. Scotty and co love to go tall but the game is moving away from that to have only a few talls with lots of hybrids and smalls that bring PACE.
Sydney beat us with PACE to break lines.
Also seems like not much bridging the gap in experience...we'll have a glut of kids and a glut of older blokes. No real in between.
It's a real vacuum, i can see us having a very low amount of wins in 2025 and that's fine, we for the first time in about 20 years will have to rely mainly on kids getting us wins. That's where our rebuild comes in. I can see Scotty and Danger finishing up together end of 2026. Hands the keys over to James Kelly and co
To add numbers here too. My 7 players on the "I'll miss you" list have a combined 1,619 games experience.
The total games experience on the list coming into the year was something around 3,890. At the end if the year that tally is going to be 4,396. My 7 names probably play a combined 35 gamesish to see out the year so say we are dropping 1,674. If we're only adding draftees it'll be around a 38-40% reduction in games tally end of year.
We came in as the most experienced team at 88.6 games per player. If we draft to replace and fill the same number of spots we end up with 2,722 games of experience over 44 players for about 61 average games. This year that number would be the same as the Crows, 4th to last. Only Hawthorn, Freo, and North would be less experienced going into '24 as we go into '25 on that basis.
For context, North Melbourne in 2016 had more average games than we do this year. They delisted 1,345 games of experience, so ~300 less than my list. They ended up with a list experience total of 55.8, which was a drop from by far the oldest to the 7th youngest. Harvey did some heavy lifting in those numbers, but their numbers were lower. They won 6 games for the year.
Now I'm not saying we'll be North. But we do need some serious trade ins.
PS: we'd go from 11 listed players currently over 30 to 5 players over 30 by start of 2025
I think that would be a mistake. If we're losing half our current total games experience in the next two trade periods then you don't want to add instability off field.If the numbers of players leaving are as predicted (i.e. many) then I think the coach might also have an understanding with Hocking and he will leave at year end as well. If we are looking for a coach for 2025 that person will already be at the club. My bet is Stephen King.
I think that would be a mistake. If we're losing half our current total games experience in the next two trade periods then you don't want to add instability off field.