you should honestly take nothing less than 1 & 3
it is chris judd
if you take less than that i will swap pick 6 for daniel kerr next year
Pick 1 and 3 you must be on drugs
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
you should honestly take nothing less than 1 & 3
it is chris judd
if you take less than that i will swap pick 6 for daniel kerr next year
Over in the Blue room they think its in the bag with picks 3 + 5, they'r pretty confident they can trade Kennedy + 20 the the Bulldogs for pick 5.
Are we happy with 3 + 5?
I'd take this as acceptable but still a tad under Judd's real value.
3 5 bower would definitely get it over the line imoOver in the Blue room they think its in the bag with picks 3 + 5, they'r pretty confident they can trade Kennedy + 20 the the Bulldogs for pick 5.
Are we happy with 3 + 5?
I'd take this as acceptable but still a tad under Judd's real value.
with carlton offering their crap trade option which eagles arnt happy with will judd still go to collingwood,melb,ess,richmond?
This may be hard to believe, but Carlton are not trying to screw WC around (Despite all the dick waving going on between repective supporters on BF).
Ratts and Woosha (from all accounts) get on well. Worsfold was held at very high regard at Carlton before moving home to coach the Eagles, I can assure you. We have a (reasonably) good relationship between the clubs. We both have a large support group, a history of success and both sides share an arrogance and pride that serves to shit everyone else around us to tears.
Lets not let our mutual arrogance f@#$ up this deal.
Everyone is well aware that Judd is a bona fide superstar with a capitol 'S'. I live in sunny Perth, WCE are my favorite WA team even though Ive copped a lot of shit from supporters (and, sadly, rightly so - CFC have been embarrassing in recent times), and Ive seen as much of him as any WCE fan. Brownlow, Norm smith, B & F - not to mention his value in off field marketing and membership. In normal circumstances, no sane club would consider trading him - ever. However, these are not normal circumstances. He has left to go home. Now the question isn't "How much is he worth?" - it's "What value can West Coast get for him?"
Im not here to restate the obvious. Make no mistake Carlton are wrapped to be chosen by such a gun player. Under any other circumstances, we would happily give you Picks #1 + #3. However there is one small sticking point.
From all accounts we want Kruezer. You have no idea how much we need a ruckman. We (stupidly) picked up that hack Ackland in the PSD and he has been nothing but a useless pile of donkey penis for us ever since. A midfield of Murphy, Judd, Gibbs, Stevens, Carrazo is no good to anyone without a quality ruckman. We need pick #1 to get him. He will not slip past the Tigers at #2.
You guys have Cox. A genuine gun. You have Glass down back. If Lynch can figure out how to hold a mark, and with hunter popping up to win games when needed, your forward structure aint looking too bad. Your midfield is awesome with Priddis, Cuz and Kerr. Subiaco is a fortress. You will remain a force for years to come.
Unfortunately, Judd is gone. Cousins is 28 and has the threat of suspension hanging over his head if he messes up again. You must be looking at a speedy midfielder/ rebounding back to fill in for Judd/ Chick/ Wirra (and to replace Cousins just in case or to prepare for when he retires in a few years time).
From all accounts you guys dont need another ruckman in Kruezer. You are looking for another gun pacy midfielder type. Cotchin if rumours are true.
Here is the problem:
We give up #1 - You take Cotchin (or Morton/ Masten/ Palmer). Terry "I live in a solarium" Wallace takes Kruezer at #2. Carlton miss out.
There is only one good ruckman in the top ten draftee's this year. There are at least 4 gun young mids (Cotchin, Masten, Morton, Palmer). IMHO Carlton will be trying to do whatever it takes to gain the services of Kruezer and Judd. We couldnt care less if you got picks 1, 2, 3, 7, 20 etc. Hell, you deserve them. We just want Kruezer. Rather than working against us, WCE should be working with us.
Hopefully a deal can be worked out where we give you (for example):
Picks #3 + #5 = 2 exellent young mids for WCE.
Or
Find a way to upgrade #3 to #2 with the Tiges. (ie trade #3 and a player to Richmond for #2). Give you #1 + #20 + Player (Kennedy or Bower). WC select Cotchin at #1, CFC select Kruezer at #2.
Even though we dont want to screw you over, no matter what, i can assure you WCE wont get #1 and #3. Its a buyers market im afraid.
The injection of early high draft picks could be a blessing in disguise. You can start to inject some quality youth now without having to go through the pain of bottoming out and rebuilding. We at Carlton thought we were invincible once as well. Look were it got us.
That is all.
NathanAtDaBlues you have spoken the most sense on here for many days! you hit the nail on the head!
This may be hard to believe, but Carlton are not trying to screw WC around (Despite all the dick waving going on between repective supporters on BF).
Ratts and Woosha (from all accounts) get on well. Worsfold was held at very high regard at Carlton before moving home to coach the Eagles, I can assure you. We have a (reasonably) good relationship between the clubs. We both have a large support group, a history of success and both sides share an arrogance and pride that serves to shit everyone else around us to tears.
Lets not let our mutual arrogance f@#$ up this deal.
Everyone is well aware that Judd is a bona fide superstar with a capitol 'S'. I live in sunny Perth, WCE are my favorite WA team even though Ive copped a lot of shit from supporters (and, sadly, rightly so - CFC have been embarrassing in recent times), and Ive seen as much of him as any WCE fan. Brownlow, Norm smith, B & F - not to mention his value in off field marketing and membership. In normal circumstances, no sane club would consider trading him - ever. However, these are not normal circumstances. He has left to go home. Now the question isn't "How much is he worth?" - it's "What value can West Coast get for him?"
Im not here to restate the obvious. Make no mistake Carlton are wrapped to be chosen by such a gun player. Under any other circumstances, we would happily give you Picks #1 + #3. However there is one small sticking point.
From all accounts we want Kruezer. You have no idea how much we need a ruckman. We (stupidly) picked up that hack Ackland in the PSD and he has been nothing but a useless pile of donkey penis for us ever since. A midfield of Murphy, Judd, Gibbs, Stevens, Carrazo is no good to anyone without a quality ruckman. We need pick #1 to get him. He will not slip past the Tigers at #2.
You guys have Cox. A genuine gun. You have Glass down back. If Lynch can figure out how to hold a mark, and with hunter popping up to win games when needed, your forward structure aint looking too bad. Your midfield is awesome with Priddis, Cuz and Kerr. Subiaco is a fortress. You will remain a force for years to come.
Unfortunately, Judd is gone. Cousins is 28 and has the threat of suspension hanging over his head if he messes up again. You must be looking at a speedy midfielder/ rebounding back to fill in for Judd/ Chick/ Wirra (and to replace Cousins just in case or to prepare for when he retires in a few years time).
From all accounts you guys dont need another ruckman in Kruezer. You are looking for another gun pacy midfielder type. Cotchin if rumours are true.
Here is the problem:
We give up #1 - You take Cotchin (or Morton/ Masten/ Palmer). Terry "I live in a solarium" Wallace takes Kruezer at #2. Carlton miss out.
There is only one good ruckman in the top ten draftee's this year. There are at least 4 gun young mids (Cotchin, Masten, Morton, Palmer). IMHO Carlton will be trying to do whatever it takes to gain the services of Kruezer and Judd. We couldnt care less if you got picks 1, 2, 3, 7, 20 etc. Hell, you deserve them. We just want Kruezer. Rather than working against us, WCE should be working with us.
Hopefully a deal can be worked out where we give you (for example):
Picks #3 + #5 = 2 exellent young mids for WCE.
Or
Find a way to upgrade #3 to #2 with the Tiges. (ie trade #3 and a player to Richmond for #2). Give you #1 + #20 + Player (Kennedy or Bower). WC select Cotchin at #1, CFC select Kruezer at #2.
Even though we dont want to screw you over, no matter what, i can assure you WCE wont get #1 and #3. Its a buyers market im afraid.
The injection of early high draft picks could be a blessing in disguise. You can start to inject some quality youth now without having to go through the pain of bottoming out and rebuilding. We at Carlton thought we were invincible once as well. Look were it got us.
That is all.
I personally want to see a good business outcome for both Carlton and WC. Obviously the Blues want Juddy, and Juddy wants to come to the Blues. So, a good business decision from a WC point of view is to thank Juddy for his services and try and get him to where he wants to be.
But!! If the Blues are offering a deal that does NOT at least match or better what other clubs can offer WC, then by all means thats unfair and not a good deal. In this situation WC have every right to go for the better deal.
However, I honestly believe (even though I have blue blood flowing through my veins) that the Blues have put the best offer on the table so far to show they are fair dinkum about 'doing the deal'.
IMO Judd is worth picks 1, 2 and 3. But the reality is NOBODY can really pull off such a deal. If they did they would be mortgaging a lot of players to get one! As much as it hurts, you were never going to get a fair return on Judd. It sucks big time, but it's got nothing to do with Carlton being scums and not paying up. Its just a reality.
In the business of 'doing the deal', I think Carlton MUST offer the best deal of any club. Its almost like an auction - you sell to the highest bidder, at the highest bid amount (not what the bidder COULD HAVE bidded too). So while Judd may be worth #1, #3, #20 + players or whatever else you think sounds fair, we must all remember that its about business and not fairness. And in business you must accept the best offer (regardless of how fair it may seem).
For example, lets assume you had a rare painting that was up for auction and you knew you had somebody (Mr X) who could pay $10m for it, which was what its value was estimated at. But at auction bidding stopped at $8m with Mr X being the winning bidder. What do you think Mr X would say if the auctioneer said "Mr X, although you were the highest bidder at $8m, I know you know this painting is worth $10m and that you can afford that. How about you just pay the extra $2m to make things fair"? I know what I would say to the auctioneer.
The way I see it, unless Richmond come out with a super deal, then Carlton don't need to offer pick #1. While it sucks, in the big business of footy I don't think saying "throw in pick #1 to make things fair" is a realistic position. While Carlton are on the right side of the fence on this occasion, I believe things have a way of equaling each other out in the end.
In an auction the seller is entitled to put a reserve on the goods - has the option not to sell.