- Oct 16, 2011
- 16,729
- 43,455
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Translation: We're going to be pricks.
Can't really, what can they do, threaten to send him to PSD?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Translation: We're going to be pricks.
Don't have any leveridge. If they don't want pick 29 we go to PSD.Translation: We're going to be pricks.
Well some posters are saying a pick in the 30s, I think they'll want closer to what they paid. Interesting to see if we pull the psd card.Don't recall GWS not being reasonable to deal with too often if at all?
Will be interesting, its not really our style.Don't have any leveridge. If they don't want pick 29 we go to PSD.
Doubt we will use the PSD, as pick 29 should be reasonable for both parties. Prefer to be honourable.Would you guys consider the pre-season draft? Get him for free?
What they want and what they get will be poles apart, he's uncontracted and a deal fair to both parties will be negotiated no doubt favouring us.Well some posters are saying a pick in the 30s, I think they'll want closer to what they paid. Interesting to see if we pull the psd card.
Perfect. Could easily prove a shrewd acquisition and will certainly get a lot of opportunities here, even if Brad doesn't leave.
No, we don't burn our bridges like your mob.
Indeed.If we can get Atkins out and Hateley in with no net cost to us (in terms of trade value) then I reckon that's pretty savvy work by the club.
We absolutely would, only way to get him for a reasonable price. GWS have a weak hand here, entirely fair to exploit that (within reason).
On H8416 using BigFooty.com mobile app
Will....Not....Happen
What do you think is fair? I feel they'll want something resembling the original pick -we would. They're bleeding players worse than us and are starting to get shitty about it.What they want and what they get will be poles apart, he's uncontracted and a deal fair to both parties will be negotiated no doubt favouring us.
I know it's a different situation, but whenever someone nominates us, I get PTSD from the whole failed Gibbs trade...We can get him for nothing in the PSD so we hold all the cards.
Any hope GWS had of getting fair value went out the window the moment he nominated us.
Uncontracted, he's named his destination club....Jason McCartney is their list manager, you know that guy that played 3 seasons for the Crows, GWS' record of being fair traders.What do you think is fair? I feel they'll want something resembling the original pick -we would. They're bleeding players worse than us and are starting to get shitty about it.
You're certain we wont use the psd as leverage... so why would the deal favour us?