If Smack has agreed to a strategy to nominate for the PSD then we've been screwed again and if I hear our club stating they don't like the PSD threat then I will vomit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
He's on a two year contract yeah? With contracts such as Martin and Jaensch also coming to end, the 2014 off-season is a huge opportunity to clear out some deadwood.
If Smack has agreed to a strategy to nominate for the PSD then we've been screwed again and if I hear our club stating they don't like the PSD threat then I will vomit.
To be honest, even if we had traded him, it would have been for a pick we wouldn't even use. We're only using 2 picks and we'd struggle to better our #46 with McKernan.
But we could have grouped that pick with pick 23 and then on traded that to get us into the high teens.
Not the pointTo be honest, even if we had traded him, it would have been for a pick we wouldn't even use. We're only using 2 picks and we'd struggle to better our #46 with McKernan.
Not the point
To who?
Who would give up a high teens pick for #23 and #46?
Hawthorn traded 19 to the Saints, but I get your point.I don't know, that wasn't really the point. I guess we could have shopped it around to who ever needed it.
An example - Hawthorne may have needed it - 23 & 46 for 19
Maybe, if the player wasn't Smack. Forget about having a go at the club, we should be celebrating his departure and mercilessly mocking the stupidity of the club which talked him into going down this path.If Smack has agreed to a strategy to nominate for the PSD then we've been screwed again and if I hear our club stating they don't like the PSD threat then I will vomit.
On your first point if it happens it doesn't matter who the player is no matter how much you despise him.Maybe, if the player wasn't Smack. Forget about having a go at the club, we should be celebrating his departure and mercilessly mocking the stupidity of the club which talked him into going down this path.
Assuming it actually happens... right now you're just jumping at shadows and looking for an excuse to attack the club like so many paranoid posters on this board.
But we could have grouped that pick with pick 23 and then on traded that to get us into the high teens.
But if you are aggressive in your trading you would get something.To who?
Who would give up a high teens pick for #23 and #46?
But if you are aggressive in your trading you would get something.
Unpopular with fans maybe, but not within the club. He's best mates with Sloaney.Mckernan will leave the club and get picked up in the psd..He would have to be the most unpopular player at the club and a fresh start with supporters who support him would do him the world of good.
Unpopular with fans maybe, but not within the club. He's best mates with Sloaney.
But if you are aggressive in your trading you would get something.
Can we change the title please?
As he hasn't quit the Crows yet. I get excited when I read it as then get a massive let down when I realize he hasn't.
Was going to say exactly the same thing!
Sure. What do you suggest?
I believe you think that being aggressive means offering good players for high picks and taking chances in the draft. Or offering free agents offers they cannot refuse.Is that what you understood people to be saying about being more aggressive? Negotiate with a louder voice?
McKernan, where to next? Crows or PSD?
You're saying this because of a myspace message back at draft time I assume. There isn't a lot of basis for it.
This. Why are people happy if he walks? He's better backup to Sauce than anyone left on our list.Rather hold onto McKernan for another year than Graham.