
- Mar 11, 2019
- 17,276
- 28,444
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Been tipping the ones i want to win in my family and friends comp which has worked fairly well for me so farPies or Bombers today?
Saying that ESS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Been tipping the ones i want to win in my family and friends comp which has worked fairly well for me so farPies or Bombers today?
Like wise but i need them to rise to say 9th-12th so they have worse draft picks17thmond. Love it!
Yeah I didn't have them as a bottom 4 team this year but that injury run as absolutely cooked them17thmond. Love it!
When i bash umps i also feel sorry for them and really my problem isn't with the umps it is the rules and AFL weekly directive that changes well weekly.Probably a cliche to say you're sick of umpire bashing but the media drive me mad. They scrutinise every call, have forced the review system and now constantly complain about the use of review. You can't have it both ways.
The ball hitting the umpire last night was questioned. On fox footy they highlighted it and questioned what should've happened? Montagna says "well we know it cost Richmond deeply". Nankervis s**t kick cost them. It annoys me the umpires have to come out and justify the call today. We're never going to get it all right, it hit the umpires leg, he didn't know Melbourne would kick a goal after Richmond had won possession. Now all the nuffies start bleating about umpires and corruption.
If we think umpire scrutiny improves the game, fine, but then don't complain about umpires being afraid to make calls and using the review system. It is a frustrating contradiction.
Honest to God they have enough to deal with without the media. The afl needs to find a way to sanction journos for complaining about them. Bar them from pressers etc.Probably a cliche to say you're sick of umpire bashing but the media drive me mad. They scrutinise every call, have forced the review system and now constantly complain about the use of review. You can't have it both ways.
The ball hitting the umpire last night was questioned. On fox footy they highlighted it and questioned what should've happened? Montagna says "well we know it cost Richmond deeply". Nankervis s**t kick cost them. It annoys me the umpires have to come out and justify the call today. We're never going to get it all right, it hit the umpires leg, he didn't know Melbourne would kick a goal after Richmond had won possession. Now all the nuffies start bleating about umpires and corruption.
If we think umpire scrutiny improves the game, fine, but then don't complain about umpires being afraid to make calls and using the review system. It is a frustrating contradiction.
It's just so easy and tired, and it rallies all of the aggressive and abusive types that are then legitimately angry towards umpires.Honest to God they have enough to deal with without the media. The afl needs to find a way to sanction journos for complaining about them. Bar them from pressers etc.
The commentators are a huge problem agreed most of them don't actually commentate and spew shit and those who do commentate are mostly bad at it/biased or don't understand the rules properly which is strange since a lot of them played AFL.It's just so easy and tired, and it rallies all of the aggressive and abusive types that are then legitimately angry towards umpires.
I get frustrated by calls too, and sometimes the score review system takes a while (doesn't bother me that much) but to hear legitimate whingeing by commentators about score reviews "this is taking too long, just make a call, this is ridiculous etc" only to then scrutinise calls continuously is insane.
Professional cricket has also fallen victim to this trend. Umpires, gripped by the fear of being proven wrong by reviews, often refrain from making a call. This is particularly evident in run-outs, where umpires opt for a review even when it's glaringly obvious that the batter fell short.If we think umpire scrutiny improves the game, fine, but then don't complain about umpires being afraid to make calls and using the review system. It is a frustrating contradiction.
I've thought for a while that broadcast rights should be contingent on minimal commentary relating to umpiring during the broadcast. The conversation can be had during the week on myriad shows and interviews.Probably a cliche to say you're sick of umpire bashing but the media drive me mad. They scrutinise every call, have forced the review system and now constantly complain about the use of review. You can't have it both ways.
The ball hitting the umpire last night was questioned. On fox footy they highlighted it and questioned what should've happened? Montagna says "well we know it cost Richmond deeply". Nankervis s**t kick cost them. It annoys me the umpires have to come out and justify the call today. We're never going to get it all right, it hit the umpires leg, he didn't know Melbourne would kick a goal after Richmond had won possession. Now all the nuffies start bleating about umpires and corruption.
If we think umpire scrutiny improves the game, fine, but then don't complain about umpires being afraid to make calls and using the review system. It is a frustrating contradiction.
Seems to me a few of them have lost interest.Like wise but i need them to rise to say 9th-12th so they have worse draft picks
I agree, and from what I've witnessed in the NBA, players sometimes getting ejected for very little is not over scrutinised by the commentators. They may say "wow, what happened there? Okay looks like he raised his arm in frustration, that's a big call" and then that's typically it. They don't say "That's ridiculous! That's going to cost them the game!" And then speak about it ad nauseum on every show for the rest of the week.I've thought for a while that broadcast rights should be contingent on minimal commentary relating to umpiring during the broadcast. The conversation can be had during the week on myriad shows and interviews.
I still don't understand what happened to dissent. Keep paying the 50's. The game turns into a circus when you allow it.
NBA & NFL are the perfect examples. One is constantly mired in controversy during the game and suffers for it. One moves past it with the players unable to question the decision. The conversations for officials in the NFL still take place, still get reviewed, and still get scrutinised. It takes place during the week in articles, podcasts, and interviews where it belongs.
So bandwagoners?Seems to me a few of them have lost interest.
I agree with this.I've thought for a while that broadcast rights should be contingent on minimal commentary relating to umpiring during the broadcast. The conversation can be had during the week on myriad shows and interviews.
I still don't understand what happened to dissent. Keep paying the 50's. The game turns into a circus when you allow it.
NBA & NFL are the perfect examples. One is constantly mired in controversy during the game and suffers for it. One moves past it with the players unable to question the decision. The conversations for officials in the NFL still take place, still get reviewed, and still get scrutinised. It takes place during the week in articles, podcasts, and interviews where it belongs.
True, I meant the players.So bandwagoners?
oh wait you probably mean the players well the term fits both sorta
Yeah broadcast rights need a fine system for complaining about umpires during broadcast too that's a good callI've thought for a while that broadcast rights should be contingent on minimal commentary relating to umpiring during the broadcast. The conversation can be had during the week on myriad shows and interviews.
I still don't understand what happened to dissent. Keep paying the 50's. The game turns into a circus when you allow it.
NBA & NFL are the perfect examples. One is constantly mired in controversy during the game and suffers for it. One moves past it with the players unable to question the decision. The conversations for officials in the NFL still take place, still get reviewed, and still get scrutinised. It takes place during the week in articles, podcasts, and interviews where it belongs.