- Oct 2, 2010
- 20,605
- 74,809
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
Disappointed in the result but mainly frustrated because we looked like two different teams throughout the game, and one of those teams was great to watch. The issue was the other version of us wasn't. Despite the result, it was just great to be live at a game again.
- Hayes was great. So hard to believe he's never been on a list before. 3 goals on debut, some incredible marks and just handled every moment so well. Hasn't made it easy for Ryder to walk back in (I'd fit them both in if we had that luxury!)
- While Hayes will get a lot of the credit, I thought it was Sinclair who changed the game in the third quarter. As soon as he went into the midfield, we suddenly looked dangerous and alive. gringo2011 was right about moving him into the middle with our outs. Was surprised to see criticism of Gresham in here too. His 2nd half was a huge reason we were in the game. He is a midfielder who makes us a much better side.
- I reject the notion (I think it was from Rieowldt) that we only decided to 'try' in the 3rd quarter. There was a lot of positional and structural changes which occurred that helped us get on top, it wasnt suddenly from the players just trying more. As mentioned, Sinclair and Gresh into the middle. DMac to half back, Ross replaced him on the wing. Changed the position of the forwards. We started defending a lot deeper rather than being dragged up the field which cos us a few in the first. We got a lot better at keeping a defender back too. Took Byrnes out of the middle. My biggest question is why it took us so long to make some changes? As soon as Sinclair and Gresh went on the ball, we were a different team. And why was there multiple centre bounces at the start of the 2nd where we went with Steele, Byrnes and Owens? That really needed addressed moving forward.
- Higgins is incredible frustrating because he is walking that fine line between being dominant and costing us. Tonight is was the latter. King's misses also costly, especially since they were so gettable, but he was a big reason we were still in the game at half time. Another week where he seemed to always be double teamed - great coaching by Collingwood to constantly have Howe coming across as one of the few who can get high enough to compete with him in the air.
- Marshall is a superstar and should be playing as the number 1 ruck every week. Not much more to say about him.
- Probably the worst game Howard has played for us. I also thought Webster needs to work out where he fits with Paton in the side too. Battle was fine - not great but promising in the role. Wilkie worked into the game. Hill was pretty good - naturally we looked better when the ball was in his hands and his defensive/contested work has improved greatly. He made some mistakes but there was also a point where he took some risk to help us try to win. They didnt work but overall, happy with his performance.
- Forward line structure needs a lot of improvement. I just don't think we are making the most of the players we have in there at the moment.
Of the rest
Membrey was his usual, reliable self. Crouch's defensive and contested work impressed me tonight - nut sure if thats something you just dont notice on TV or if it was improved on last year but I liked his game. Steele was good but just below what's become his usual standard. Owens wasn't ready. Byrnes was okay in the last, but those first 3 quarters were a long way off it. Kent just bad. I like what DMac brings to the team. Wood solid. Ross played well - less numbers in the 2nd half as a result of moving to the wing but he used it well and made good decision. Butler didnt hit the scoreboard but you could see his tackle/pressure work so thats a tick for 50% of the role.
Improvement needed - hopefully there is someone fit who can come back - but bring on Freo.
- Hayes was great. So hard to believe he's never been on a list before. 3 goals on debut, some incredible marks and just handled every moment so well. Hasn't made it easy for Ryder to walk back in (I'd fit them both in if we had that luxury!)
- While Hayes will get a lot of the credit, I thought it was Sinclair who changed the game in the third quarter. As soon as he went into the midfield, we suddenly looked dangerous and alive. gringo2011 was right about moving him into the middle with our outs. Was surprised to see criticism of Gresham in here too. His 2nd half was a huge reason we were in the game. He is a midfielder who makes us a much better side.
- I reject the notion (I think it was from Rieowldt) that we only decided to 'try' in the 3rd quarter. There was a lot of positional and structural changes which occurred that helped us get on top, it wasnt suddenly from the players just trying more. As mentioned, Sinclair and Gresh into the middle. DMac to half back, Ross replaced him on the wing. Changed the position of the forwards. We started defending a lot deeper rather than being dragged up the field which cos us a few in the first. We got a lot better at keeping a defender back too. Took Byrnes out of the middle. My biggest question is why it took us so long to make some changes? As soon as Sinclair and Gresh went on the ball, we were a different team. And why was there multiple centre bounces at the start of the 2nd where we went with Steele, Byrnes and Owens? That really needed addressed moving forward.
- Higgins is incredible frustrating because he is walking that fine line between being dominant and costing us. Tonight is was the latter. King's misses also costly, especially since they were so gettable, but he was a big reason we were still in the game at half time. Another week where he seemed to always be double teamed - great coaching by Collingwood to constantly have Howe coming across as one of the few who can get high enough to compete with him in the air.
- Marshall is a superstar and should be playing as the number 1 ruck every week. Not much more to say about him.
- Probably the worst game Howard has played for us. I also thought Webster needs to work out where he fits with Paton in the side too. Battle was fine - not great but promising in the role. Wilkie worked into the game. Hill was pretty good - naturally we looked better when the ball was in his hands and his defensive/contested work has improved greatly. He made some mistakes but there was also a point where he took some risk to help us try to win. They didnt work but overall, happy with his performance.
- Forward line structure needs a lot of improvement. I just don't think we are making the most of the players we have in there at the moment.
Of the rest
Membrey was his usual, reliable self. Crouch's defensive and contested work impressed me tonight - nut sure if thats something you just dont notice on TV or if it was improved on last year but I liked his game. Steele was good but just below what's become his usual standard. Owens wasn't ready. Byrnes was okay in the last, but those first 3 quarters were a long way off it. Kent just bad. I like what DMac brings to the team. Wood solid. Ross played well - less numbers in the 2nd half as a result of moving to the wing but he used it well and made good decision. Butler didnt hit the scoreboard but you could see his tackle/pressure work so thats a tick for 50% of the role.
Improvement needed - hopefully there is someone fit who can come back - but bring on Freo.