![](https://images.bigfootymedia.com/icons/mobile-bullets/collingwood.png)
Rusty22
Norm Smith Medallist
- Dec 12, 2010
- 7,076
- 5,540
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Collingwood VFL
nah that lives in my pantsDon't get too excited. Rusty's "source" is big, black, and lives in his bedside table drawer.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
nah that lives in my pantsDon't get too excited. Rusty's "source" is big, black, and lives in his bedside table drawer.
With Thomas, Greenwood unavaiable.
Ball, Lumumba, Beams traded/retired
Freeman, Sharenberg not ready
Does it mean that Sidebottom might play predominantly as an inside midfielder? He has done it before in 2012, and performed well.
Fair enough, but if we are relying on players like Adams De Goey and Freeman to carry out inside ball we might as well just forfeit the game.We have Adams, plus we can blood De Goey and Freeman.
Fair enough, but if we are relying on players like Adams De Goey and Freeman to carry out inside ball we might as well just forfeit the game.
ahhh right. To me it seems exceedingly obvious the current coach has continued with the defensive pressure aspect. Hence goldsack's role. Don't follow your logic with one coach it was a game plan with another its not.Old game plan was under a different coach.
I don't agree with the new plan, it's lacked the any sort of defensive mindset to win enough games to be a premiership force. Playing the boundary in defence in a must play the boundary right up to the wing in fact, the ball comes too fast on the counter otherwise. Been a massive problem for 3 years.ahhh right. To me it seems exceedingly obvious the current coach has continued with the defensive pressure aspect. Hence goldsack's role. Don't follow your logic with one coach it was a game plan with another its not.
I don't agree with the new plan, it's lacked the any sort of defensive mindset to win enough games to be a premiership force. Playing the boundary in defence in a must play the boundary right up to the wing in fact, the ball comes too fast on the counter otherwise. Been a massive problem for 3 years.
You know exactly what I mean, you get my point so Im not sure what the problem is? If players who have yet to play an AFL game are our leading candidates for that inside role, then of course we are in an unpleasant stateIf we're relying on players recruited to be inside midfielders to be inside midfielders we should forfeit? I get two of them are young and inexperienced but geez give them a chance man!
You know exactly what I mean, you get my point so Im not sure what the problem is? If players who have yet to play an AFL game are our leading candidates for that inside role, then of course we are in an unpleasant state
Well put. My hope is that we take it on this year rather than try to be competitive. I still believe we have a core of significant talent even if it's a bit depleted and we can go for wins rather than just trying to hold station. FWIW, I believe that wins achieved this way have a far greater impact on team confidence moving forward than wins achieved by holding out the opposition.For mine there are three keys to this match.
1. Kick straight early. This match will be red hot early and if we burn chances it will just deflate everyone!
2. Fittest team wins. That means no Seedsman, no Witts, no DeGoey and no Freeman. Fairytail starts to careers and underdone players won't get the job done Saturday night.
3. Be within 4 goals at the long break. We lost 5 matches by 10 goals plus last year and the average half time margin in those matches was 29 points. If there's a gap at half time for whatever spin you want to put on it we struggle to be competitive after that point.
At the end of the day we start the season 2 players short and I think it's going to be a long year win, lose or draw. However I just want to see something I can hang my hat on and say "we may have lost or won, but blah blah blah is something we can build on going forward". I'm not sure that happened in a single match post bye last year so please guys give me something because I'm sick of venting post match!
FWIW team selection will be indicitive names like Broomhead and PK up forward means we want to take the game on whereas Goldsack and Blair indicate we want to be competitive, IMO.
What would Blair, Broomhead, Goldsack and Karnezis mean?For mine there are three keys to this match.
1. Kick straight early. This match will be red hot early and if we burn chances it will just deflate everyone!
2. Fittest team wins. That means no Seedsman, no Witts, no DeGoey and no Freeman. Fairytail starts to careers and underdone players won't get the job done Saturday night.
3. Be within 4 goals at the long break. We lost 5 matches by 10 goals plus last year and the average half time margin in those matches was 29 points. If there's a gap at half time for whatever spin you want to put on it we struggle to be competitive after that point.
At the end of the day we start the season 2 players short and I think it's going to be a long year win, lose or draw. However I just want to see something I can hang my hat on and say "we may have lost or won, but blah blah blah is something we can build on going forward". I'm not sure that happened in a single match post bye last year so please guys give me something because I'm sick of venting post match!
FWIW team selection will be indicitive names like Broomhead and PK up forward means we want to take the game on whereas Goldsack and Blair indicate we want to be competitive, IMO.
What would Blair, Broomhead, Goldsack and Karnezis mean?
That was the old game plan.
I don't think we've had one for three years.Do you think there is one game plan for every situation?
I don't think we've had one for three years.
Who thinks we will win?
what makes you think that? being biased or what?I do.
i like that side, but think Williams may find himself in there at someone's expenseThis is the side I think we will go with. Whilst it is going to be tough, we have plenty of experience and should give a good account of ourselves. Pies in a tight one - 9pts.
B: Sinclair Brown Toovey
HB: Langdon Frost Crisp
C: Broomhead Sidebottom Varcoe
HF: Swan White Fasolo
F: Goldsack Cloke Elliott
Foll: Grundy Pendlebury Adams
Sub: Blair
i like that side, but think Williams may find himself in there at someone's expense
surely williams over sinclairHe might do. Personally I think it is a choice between him and Sinclair. The match committee may disagree of course.