- Mar 23, 2007
- 34,932
- 23,542
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Man U, Canucks and 49ers
I think they would bring in Max before Lowden.
This is the same Max Bailey that has played one game of footy (for BH) in the past 3 months right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I think they would bring in Max before Lowden.
I reckon we are due for a loss this week. We have not been seriously challenged over the past month or so and the Pies are flag faves in my book. They had their 'off' games against Carlton and are unilkely to be flat again. We will miss the Budster a lot more than last week....Hopefully we can put up a solid fight at least and then bounce back hard over the next two rounds and smash the Cats and Bombers.
Yep, and will also make them more arrogant and over confident that they can beat us, which will be their undoingin SeptmeberWe may lose this week but with franklin, hodge and guerra back we will beat them come september, its all about personel, take swan, cloke and shaw out of their team and put our 3 back in and its a different ball game, a loss now will fire us up more for the finals, if the pies cant win this week they wont beat us again this year.
Looking at the teams on paper and while both forward lines could in theory get on top of the respective backlines it's this that is crucial.
Swan, Pendlebury, Sidebottom, Beams & Thomas
Now that's 5 players, 4 of which have a genuine claim for All-Australian this year and the other was All Australian last year. That is a serious unit.
Compare that to...
Mitchell, Lewis, Sewell, Shiels & Young
...and we're at a serious disadvantage on paper.
Yes I can confirm that is the same Max Bailey. I think Lowden will not get a shot this year with Max back and will wait his turn to next year. Test Hale out against the big teams in the next few weeks (where he has struggled) and if he does not perform, Bailey comes in.This is the same Max Bailey that has played one game of footy (for BH) in the past 3 months right?
Tom Murphy should get the other, he does a good job on more established small forwards than either Blair or Fassolo
Probably the weakest part of Collingwoods game, if it is a weakness, is they dont have a huge amount of pace. Swan, obviously an exception to this so why dont we load up with Savage in for Cheney. Use him as the sub and inject pace midway through the 3rd quarter.
FB: Stratton Gilham Suckling
HB: Burgoyne Gibson Birchall
Ce: Smith Mitchell Whitecross
R : Hale Sewell Shiels
HF: Rioli Schoenmakers. Lewis
FF: Gunstan Roughead Puopolo
IC: Young Breust Murphy
SUB: Savage
I would start Cyril in the middle and try and give him as much time through there as possible, Harry O'Brien normally plays pretty well on him so we need to mix up their plan a bit, maybe use him through the centre and running forward instead. Burgoyne, as well could be a high impact player through the middle at times with his ability to find space and time (bit like Pendlebury) being key. We know he can still rotate through there, we saw it only a few weeks ago when he was close to best on ground.
Obviously that means Rioli, Smith, Young, Burgoyne and Savage are important with their pace and carry to make the magpies run the other way too.
Starting centre square:
Hale
Rioli
Mitchell
Burgoyne
and then have Sewell, Shiels, Lewis, Whitecross etc move through there. Wouldnt mind seeing Burgoyne run with a Collingwood jet like Thomas or someone
There' is 0% chance Buddy would play, just hopeful nuffies.
says who?Right now he's 50/50. Maybe even 60/40.
Right now he's 50/50. Maybe even 60/40.
says who?
says who?
Well it depends on what you believe, really. I mean, it's not as if the HFC are often truthful when it comes to injuries. Then you look at the actual injury. A corky which resulted in them finding a slight hamstring tear.
A full blown hamstring is often a four-weeker, so for them to say a slight tear will see him miss close the same time frame (will be 25 days between GWS game and Geelong game) I just find un-realistic.
What I believe (and I don't expect others to, but I have since being in the crowd at the GWS game) is that it was just a corky, and he had the week off to get that right and the very minor hamstring tweak, he will train this week and pull on the boots Saturday.
Ok footy clubs might not often be totally open with the extent of injuries and what-not (with a lot of that to do with them not knowing themselves, healing isn't always a set thing) but I can't remember the last time a player came back significantly earlier than they were originally reported to be out for.
Agree with this. So unusual of the club to say that a player is out for 3 weeks. Usually they downplay it, say it'll be 1-2 weeks and then test the player and stretch it out to 3, 4 or 5 matches if there's any doubt. All of a sudden Buddy does a slight tear and they declare 3 weeks? For a hammy tear they didn't even ice up on match day?
Very very strange - as we've come to expect from the club. (I don't get angry about it, I just find it all puzzling).
Would love to see him named tomorrow night.
Awesome username by the way - it's like have Dwayne right here with usBang on mate, I too noticed they didn't ice anything on the day. Very odd.