Jen2310
Premium Platinum
Thats possible but maybe unlikely, unless you completely drop a small forward, because as I was saying we wont play 5 smalls in the starting 22.Leggy as sub?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thats possible but maybe unlikely, unless you completely drop a small forward, because as I was saying we wont play 5 smalls in the starting 22.Leggy as sub?
They have a dilemma....they have a plethora of forwards, and Henry/Rohan are very similar. If they play both, they have to omit one of their small forwards. Their new mature recruit, Mannagh played well and is unlikely to make way for Henry (who was sub last game).Interesting reading the Cats preview thread. A few don't seem to rate Henry too highly. 'Selfish' 'Liability' 'Prefer he doesn't play at all, let alone as the sub'
I'd be surprised if he isn't selected for a game against his old side.
Awww poor things. What a dilemma to have.They have a dilemma....they have a plethora of forwards, and Henry/Rohan are very similar. If they play both, they have to omit one of their small forwards. Their new mature recruit, Mannagh played well and is unlikely to make way for Henry (who was sub last game).
i dont think he will be selected...or maybe solely as a furphy to make us think he will be playing.
Maybe Ollie will be seeking a transfer back to us next year.Awww poor things. What a dilemma to have.
Greedy fkers didn't need Henry after all.
Unless one of those small forwards plays wing? midfield?Thats possible but maybe unlikely, unless you completely drop a small forward, because as I was saying we wont play 5 smalls in the starting 22.
Buckley was one of few coaches to have a positive win/loss against Chris ScottJust saw a stat. Since 2004 Geelong v Collingwood results are 18 to 15 their way but as the Geelong poster added-that must be the worst win loss ratio the Cats have against any club during that period of enormous success.
Yeah, maybe. HH can go on the wing if need be.Unless one of those small forwards plays wing? midfield?
Is he still in charge?imagine having to deal with Mackie again
Should be a good game.Remember last year Round 1 when they were 16.3 and a goal up at 3/4 time.
And then the second time we played them we were about 4 goals up at 3/4 time and they just started pressing really hard at the end including a goal from the carpark!
Who knows what this one will throw up.
Will throw up a massive victory by our team.Remember last year Round 1 when they were 16.3 and a goal up at 3/4 time.
And then the second time we played them we were about 4 goals up at 3/4 time and they just started pressing really hard at the end including a goal from the carpark!
Who knows what this one will throw up.
Exactly. And that is the context where our team will just go for broke. Attack will be the priority. Chaos, motion, ...that's when we connect best.Should be a good game.
Just want to see us bring the heat.
We have nothing to lose.
He’s football manager I think now but I’d imagine his fingerprints are still over big recruiting decisionsIs he still in charge?
Who would you rather -- Mackie, or Dodoro? lolHe’s football manager I think now but I’d imagine his fingerprints are still over big recruiting decisions
Hopefully.Exactly. And that is the context where our team will just go for broke. Attack will be the priority. Chaos, motion, ...that's when we connect best.
They likewise will need everything to go right.Hopefully.
We are a fair way off our best and they are in form.
Think we can win but will need everything to go right.
lolWho would you rather -- Mackie, or Dodoro? lol
Essendon or Carlton ?lol
Dracula or Frankenstein ??
Dodoro.Who would you rather -- Mackie, or Dodoro? lol
It could extend Sidey’s career.I get why everyone thinks that way
Footy has been that way for a long time. "This is the way it's done so anything outside of that is weird"
I just reckon the comp is prime for a team to come along and actually use the sub to their advantage in a real way. It's been that way in soccer for a long time where clubs actually back their system in and often use stars as the sub to get over the line, turn a match around or even put the foot to the throat
Given the way we also have so many good players carrying niggles, it's also a way to manage some of those players through
Again, I mentioned earlier that this is all under the guise of taking the club's (Fly's) words at face value that "it's not about the magnets" and that we back in our system.
Working under the assumption that that's not all just a bunch of front facing media fluff, I reckon using a gun player as the sub could be something we could try to maybe move ahead of the pack and give us a point of difference.
Hawks second rounder should do it.Maybe Ollie will be seeking a transfer back to us next year.
They choose who they play at their home ground???? Yet another example of AFL favouritism!!
Not really. No Howe,Checkers, Cox, Mcreery, Mitchell, Mcstay- a lot of pieces still missing. Quaynor has been worried by a toe injury and Markov battling a back problem.Will throw up a massive victory by our team.
Have a good feeling.
Think we have lots of pieces of the jigsaw back, and we are well aware of the granite like mentality of this team.