hawkman
Hall of Famer
Williams and yes under the new interpretation this yearAnyone think the Carlton defender (don't know name) was holding the ball in the dying minutes about 30m out directly in front?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Williams and yes under the new interpretation this yearAnyone think the Carlton defender (don't know name) was holding the ball in the dying minutes about 30m out directly in front?
Thanks. Looked to me like Williams threw the ball.Williams and yes under the new interpretation this year
Ned Ryderson - still not twenty pages. Shame isn't it. What can we do to change that, perhaps?
Easy, I’m not critiquing him too harshly.He’s played 6 games.
Maybe wait until he’s played a few more before critiquing him too harshly, and particularly against Sam Mitchell.
Yep could have easily smashed the TV with that one, disgraceful decision in which the umpire who made the call should be stood down until they understand the game they are officiating.Thought Breust was worse. He took a bouncing ball mid air and was chicken winged straight away for HTB.
Durdin essentially kicks a point that wins it for them after dropping the ball in a tackle. Absolutely ridiculous umpiring all game.
Shocking first quarter by us but then were able to grind out a comeback.
Also that last effort by Sicily was absolutely piss poor, he should have just smashed into Weitering.
To be fair, I think part of the growth of Sicily as a player is that he's learnt when restraint is required. If he goes in hard when late to the contest he risks giving away a 50 at a very crucial moment in the game. I can see him copping it for being undisciplined if he'd gone that route, with people saying the subsequent 50 had thrown away our chances of getting back in front, so I think it was a very difficult situation at that point in time.
Or, given DGB's game yesterday, he could revisit his views on how we blew pick 6 on him.Maybe you should to post some more of your nonsense opinions regarding Mitchell, that will surely generate enough posts to get it there.
On first blush he took some short steps and I was mightily peeved that he did so, I felt he needed to create a contest and "crash the pack" to bring the ball to ground - fairly of course, im not advocating he should have gone the man.
If he was sprinting at that ball with intent, he could of got there and brought the ball to ground, its not inconceivable given our momentum and numbers around that ball that we would have gone on and won. That wasnt one of those situations where "restraint was required".
Disappointing to say the least. Ahwell, Sicily gets a pass for on account of the large body of 'awesome things' he does.
Similar goes for CJ, one shit, half-assed and unaware effort gifted them a goal, he also gets a pass and is clearly fast becoming a superstar of our great club.
But those two efforts right there are the difference between winning and losing close games - we will learn, we will improve.
Im not going to be that guy that says we were shafted by the umps, because we werent., but the umpiring department is an absolute shambles - the interpretation of basic rules is cooked.
Thought Breust was worse. He took a bouncing ball mid air and was chicken winged straight away for HTB.
He threw the ball in the air and caught it again while in the tackle. When I was a kid that was dropping the ball every day of the week. It's the same as bouncing it. Then he threw it over the shoulder.Anyone think the Carlton defender (don't know name) was holding the ball in the dying minutes about 30m out directly in front?
He threw the ball in the air and caught it again while in the tackle. When I was a kid that was dropping the ball every day of the week. It's the same as bouncing it. Then he threw it over the shoulder.
At the end of the day the main problem was Hawthorn's shambolic first quarter, including Gunston's early miss.He threw the ball in the air and caught it again while in the tackle. When I was a kid that was dropping the ball every day of the week. It's the same as bouncing it. Then he threw it over the sho
Simply not true. At the end of the day the total margin DESPITE WHEN THE SCORES WERE ACHEIVED was, or could have been, less than the effect of umpire error. It'd be a tad silly to say after a loss "the main problem was the 27 minutes throughout the game where the opposition kicked all their goals. You're either playing against 25 or you are not. Personally I thought there were three occasions where Hawthorn was ripped off, and only one where Carlton was. That one resulted in a typical free kick on the wing that amounted to nothing. The three times Hawthorn was rogered resulted in 1.1 and a missed opportunity at our end. Potentially 13 point turnaround directly influenced by, at best, umpire error.At the end of the day the main problem was Hawthorn's shambolic first quarter, including Gunston's early miss.
I think we are going to have some absolute ripper contests over the next few seasons.It is interesting to observe that Carlton adapted to our game and became much more defensive structurally. They were structured much higher up the ground but were forced to shift as they game wore on and we were getting out the back. By them adapting they probably won the game. It was a fascinating contest.
To be fair, if you take away all the wildly idiotic umpire calls, we win that by 3 goals. Piss off.To be fair there was a similar play at the other end of the ground with a Hawks player giving out a don't argue, then being tackled to have the ball spill. No call there either...
6 goals behind at quarter time is satisfactory?Simply not true. At the end of the day the total margin DESPITE WHEN THE SCORES WERE ACHEIVED was, or could have been, less than the effect of umpire error. It'd be a tad silly to say after a loss "the main problem was the 27 minutes throughout the game where the opposition kicked all their goals. You're either playing against 25 or you are not. Personally I thought there were three occasions where Hawthorn was ripped off, and only one where Carlton was. That one resulted in a typical free kick on the wing that amounted to nothing. The three times Hawthorn was rogered resulted in 1.1 and a missed opportunity at our end. Potentially 13 point turnaround directly influenced by, at best, umpire error.
This by no means supersedes the horror that was the 4th quarter round 2, 2019 which cost us a finals spot. But then you'd probably blame some other loss for that.
I don't know if I could actually type slow enough for you to be able to read it, but Carlton got the massive rub of the green, on the whole. Pittonet taking out Reeves legs then getting a free for it, he must have been laughing uncontrollably on the inside. Then he kicks it (like he did at Hawthorn), straight down the opposition's throat. So the umpire had to step in again and hand the ball over because Sicily holding his forward and somehow using his own jumper to do it. I wasn't aware until that point that holding an opposition players fingers with your jumper was illegal. My new thing for the day. Quite chuffed.To be fair there was a similar play at the other end of the ground with a Hawks player giving out a don't argue, then being tackled to have the ball spill. No call there either...