ok, you win.maccas_no1 said:Thats nothing compared to the game in Rnd 20 1999 that I sat through at the SCG, think from memory that we got flogged by 120 pts and Lockett had an absolute feild day I think the AFC only managed four goals that day
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
ok, you win.maccas_no1 said:Thats nothing compared to the game in Rnd 20 1999 that I sat through at the SCG, think from memory that we got flogged by 120 pts and Lockett had an absolute feild day I think the AFC only managed four goals that day
lozstar said:ok, you win.
Truck Rutten said:Guys I'm going up for the game this weekend. You're not filling me with a lot of confidence that it's going to be an enjoyable day
McLeod23 said:I would play McGregor on Hall, Rutten on Goodes if he plays forward and Torney on O'Loughlin.
I was at the Sydney v. Brisbane game, and they certainly didn't flood to any great extent. They simply try to leave a lot of room in their forward line. For the first three quarters they basically just stuffed around with too many handpasses in the midfield, resulting in poor delivery to the forward line and multiple turnovers. In the final quarter they start to kick long, and got some drive from the backline (Kennelly especially) and were able to run down the Lions.
Will be an interesting game.
Bockchoy67 said:Nail. Hammer. Head.
O'Keefe
Bloods Rule! said:Hi guys,
I thought I'd come over and see how you are all viewing the game on Sunday. Reading the first posts here, I thought it might be easy as several were talking about the Swans flooding our backline. That sounds more like a reading from the Advertiser than any time spent watching the Swans play. We rarely drop players back in defence - didn't even do it when the Kangaroos did it to us at Manuka. Rather we play a crowded midfield then try to run it hard out of defence through players like Kennelly and Barry. So Paul Roos is right - the Swans don't flood but they certainly tackle hard.
QUOTE]
You don't flood.......... that is the funniest thing I have ever heard. You did it in the first 3 mins against Brisbane and right up until 3 quarter time. Malcolm Blight pointed it out.
You are the biggest flooding team in the league....... and if you don't think so, you have no idea.
AJ_No.4 said:Bloods Rule! said:Hi guys,
I thought I'd come over and see how you are all viewing the game on Sunday. Reading the first posts here, I thought it might be easy as several were talking about the Swans flooding our backline. That sounds more like a reading from the Advertiser than any time spent watching the Swans play. We rarely drop players back in defence - didn't even do it when the Kangaroos did it to us at Manuka. Rather we play a crowded midfield then try to run it hard out of defence through players like Kennelly and Barry. So Paul Roos is right - the Swans don't flood but they certainly tackle hard.
QUOTE]
You don't flood.......... that is the funniest thing I have ever heard. You did it in the first 3 mins against Brisbane and right up until 3 quarter time. Malcolm Blight pointed it out.
You are the biggest flooding team in the league....... and if you don't think so, you have no idea.
I just came back to see if anyone responded to what I wrote. Glad I did - and thanks to those who decided to discuss the forthcoming game sensibly. Then I got to AJ who I guess still believes in the toothfairy and everything that the 'Tiser writes about footy. (Who is that guy who writes about footy there by the way?) You didn't seem to refute what I wrote - just ridiculed it. So I presume you have decided to redefine "flooding" as putting a lot of players around the ball? Most regard it as filling the defensive 50 so that the opposition can't score.
By the way, how funny was it that Leigh Matthews kept a straight face when he was accusing Roos of flooding before the game last weekend? As Roos pointed out after the Gabba game last year, the Swannies chipped the ball around because EVERY Lion player was in their defensive 50 towards the end of the R1 game last year. And if you watch the last quarter of the Swans/Lions game last weekend, every cutaway of Leigh showed him frantically yelling into the phone and waving his players to flood back. But "the champs" don't flood, I read that somewhere. So I guess they don't. I must have imagined it.
An advantage the Swans have is that the other states see us rarely. So it's fair enough that you rely on what you hear. In 2003, under the new coach Paul Roos, we were regarded purely as a hard running team - shut us down and we'd lose. So last year, Roos developed a second game plan - we'd shut down other teams. It got wins but it wasn't pretty. But we had so many players out with injury that it was about the only way we could get wins until the second half of the season.
For the start of this season, we have surprisingly few injuries. In R1 we played the Hawks and hardly needed a game plan - they are talented but they are raw so we just had to hustle them till they made mistakes then we'd take the ball and score. R2 was pure ugly. The Roos decided to just shut us down and we just played their game. We kicked like crap and made enough mistakes that they could get away from us in the final quarter. The Lions were trying the same late run approach against Port that weekend but left their run a bit late. I rode my motorcycle down to Canberra for the Manuka game and it was a cold miserable ride home after watching my team play so poorly.
The Lions game wasn't like that at all. It was a tough game and it's no surprise that Aker is now well in front of everyone else in the AFL for tackles made. Copeland and Selwood of the Lions stand 4th and 5th on that ladder. But it was the Swans that tackled the game to a halt? It was a fascinating contest - and a long way from the poor standard of the North Melbourne game. It wasn't a flooding game just tough man-on-man. In the 3rd quarter neither team could maintain that pressure and the Lions got away from us. But the Swans literally threw caution to the wind in Q4 and we ran over them.
Sorry for the long winded reply. Paul Roos said last year we'd never win with a one dimensional game. Right now, the Swans' confidence should be high so they know they can go long and score. But so can the Crows - just ask Port. Until last week, I'd say that the Crows midfield was performing better than ours. But players like Kennelly, Crouch, Williams, Bolton, Leo Barry and Ablett - even Goodes - weren't playing with much confidence. They have now. And putting quick thinking, brilliant kicking Nick Davis into the midfield was pretty clever, too.
I reckon this game will be a battle of tactics. I really hope it has a record high score (our way, of course) but I don't know that I won't be screaming for the Swans to shut the game down if you're running away with it.
But if you see the Swans all flooding back to protect our goal, come over to redandwhiteonline.com and give me hell. I bet you don't because I haven't seen the Swans play that way since Rodney Eade left.
By the way, I hear there was some WA district game last weekend where one team flooded so badly that they left no-one to contest the bounce! They lost by 100 points. But if you find Roo buried under a hard tackle by Crouch or Kirk, that's not a flood. Tackling is just what they do. Must be Sydney's rugby heritage.
See you at the SCG. And you can't even get chardonnay there any more - it's all bloody chablis. So much for stereotypes.
Bloods Rule! said:AJ_No.4 said:I just came back to see if anyone responded to what I wrote. Glad I did - and thanks to those who decided to discuss the forthcoming game sensibly. Then I got to AJ who I guess still believes in the toothfairy and everything that the 'Tiser writes about footy. (Who is that guy who writes about footy there by the way?) You didn't seem to refute what I wrote - just ridiculed it. So I presume you have decided to redefine "flooding" as putting a lot of players around the ball? Most regard it as filling the defensive 50 so that the opposition can't score.
QUOTE]
I don't read the advertiser, as it is full of crap. I make my own opinions.
Have you ever heard of FOXTEL???? I have it and I see a fair bit of your games, as I love watching the likes of Leo Barry and Nick Davis play.
You flood and there is no question about it. Maybe you should try and get a replay of last weeks game against Brisbane and have a look at the first quarter, maybe 2 - 3 mins in to it and tell me what it is that Sydney are doing??? And it isn't putting numbers around the ball.
I saw it first hand also when you played the Regional game over here. You flooded for a good 3 and bit quarters and then decided not to do it anymore and got yourselfs back in the game. What was worst it was ********ing down with rain and you made the game even more boring than it was already going to be because of the weather.
I do like your new term for flooding tough...... getting numbers around the ball.
I have to applaude your passion though, there should be more supporters like yourself that is that commited to your team. In the ways of travelling.
Kane McGoodwin said:I haven't seen much of the Swans this year to comment, but they must have played OK to beat the Lions at home.
What role is Goodes playing? If in the forward line I would use Kenny, with Hound v O'Loughlin (athough he may have to play on Jolly if they go tall), Truck v BBBH.
If Shauble is still out injured, we could stretch their defence. Gather Barry v Hentschel, C Bolton v Welsh & LRT v Perrie.
Bloods Rule! said:Noone is regarding this game as a gimme. But it is seen as a "must win". We just beat the Lions at the Gabba so going down to any team at home after an extra day of rest would be seen as a capitulation. It'd be a bugger to go to 2:2 - with the Dees at the SCG the following Sunday.
DaveW said:what time?
I think its not so much the opponent but wondering which Adelaide turns up.If its Adelaide from the showdown then put your glasses down, but if its Adelaide from the Telstra domeSid said:.
Im surprised you guys think its that difficult a game.
Sid said:I havent gained that much confidence in the swans yet. That game against the roos was a real backward step.
That being said, if mickey players, we will have a killer of a forward line. The home ground advantage helps as well.
Im surprised you guys think its that difficult a game.