Especially at his stage of development/age. I know many posters aren't happy about it, but Taberner being put back to the wafl was ok in my opinion. Just a normal part of player development.Going back isn't a bad thing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Especially at his stage of development/age. I know many posters aren't happy about it, but Taberner being put back to the wafl was ok in my opinion. Just a normal part of player development.Going back isn't a bad thing.
Not sure Tabs is comparable. For starters, KPF vs mid and then there is the obvious talent differential. Also completely different characters. Agree that Tabs going back worked a treat, but I haven't seen anything that makes me think Andy is better off at Peel.Especially at his stage of development/age. I know many posters aren't happy about it, but Taberner being put back to the wafl was ok in my opinion. Just a normal part of player development.
His hands have been pretty good -> great since he got here most of the time. It's only his kicking (especially for goal) that's a problem. The thing that encourages me about it is it is a weighting issue most of the time. Won't even be an elite kick but can become effective within his limitations like Neale, Cotchin etc.I rewatched the game last night and thought Brayshaw was pretty solid. Disposal wasn’t too bad.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah fair call... I just think Bewley really will have something to offer but I honestly cant think of anyone id drop so i went for Conca who does have the experience and defensive pressure.Yeah, Conca is going no where. His disposal will never be great but he rarely loses a contest and provides a lot of grunt around the ball which is what we need more than anything. Defensively he is excellent
They should have 3 x 5 minute rounds in the octagon to see who gets the spot. My money's on GriffLogue has to earn his spot from Hughes and despite what many on here have been saying, I believe Hughes is doing a pretty damn good job this year.
Wait a minute; minimal changes to a winning side, but then you have us making 3 changes in 3 weeks?I'm thinking Ross will stay true to form and make minimal changes from a winning side, likely only Dardy in for Duman at this point with Cox (if fit) intercept marking in defence / outlet target on the wings and possibly filling in as our second ruck with Cerra / Conca likely to spend a bit more time down back than midfield. This will allow the Tabs / Hogan duo to stay forward full time with no ruck duties.
As much as I'd love to Blakely straight back in, I', guessing he will be time managed at Peel to make sure there is no re-occurrence of the hammy.
Blakely in next week for the Crows and, form dependent, Louge maybe two weeks after that against the Bombers (don't need a third tall against the tigers for the game in between) - Yeah Baby !!!!
Also Duman at the very least deserves to be seriously considered for a return.Logue has to earn his spot from Hughes and despite what many on here have been saying, I believe Hughes is doing a pretty damn good job this year.
Slightly different roles IMOAlso Duman at the very least deserves to be seriously considered for a return.
Wait a minute; minimal changes to a winning side, but then you have us making 3 changes in 3 weeks?
It seems to me that each line shouldn't have too changes unless forced.That's 3 changes over 4 weeks if my maths is correct - but was never my strong point .........
Nor obviously is grammar after re-reading the typo's in my original post !!
Bit of a balancing act getting the best 22 on the park as they come back from injury, while not upsetting a winning team - Does mean that perephery / potential best 22 players like Louge will very much have to earn their spots through the WAFL - Great position for us to be in really!
I'm happy to disagree with Ross on this one. Blakely + Peel will = TBC IMORoss seemed pretty sincere about blakely being unlikely to play AFL
It seems to me that each line shouldn't have too changes unless forced.
Bringing in a midfielder, forward and back would be ok in terms of team chemistry.
Taking out two defenders or forwards or backs would be more of an issue to me.
He sincerely planned to play Hogan as a defender last week.Ross seemed pretty sincere about blakely being unlikely to play AFL