- Apr 27, 2002
- 16,229
- 13,303
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Edmonton Oilers, Newcastle
Banhammer.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
gotta feel sorry for kochie and friends, will have to delay announcing the KENNY HINKLEY contract extension for at least another week.
If you’re refusing to acknowledge a team that was missing it’s full forward, full back, ruckman and four genuine A graders you’ve possibly lost all objectivity.Yeah it won’t say s**t actually. Nothing will except if we make it past a PF.
What objectivity have I lost if I’m waiting for a grand final appearance before giving the coach or coaching staff a ‘huge tick’ this season?If you’re refusing to acknowledge a team that was missing it’s full forward, full back, ruckman and four genuine A graders you’ve possibly lost all objectivity.
How do we get rid of Koch? Seems to be a self-appointed emperor of the place and I'm not seeing a way to shake him loose. He'll probably leave on his own accord one day but who knows when that will be.
Do you know if Hinkley's contract will include a succession plan with a formal handover to Carr?Timeline: This week, next week or the week after announce 2 year extension. Contracts for butters and rosey to then follow. 1 year for dixon. More to follow from the club.
You're a very interesting case. Per your avatar, you're purportedly a Geelong supporter yet during a game against said opposition whilst needing the win, you're posting about Ken Hinkkey's contract status. You're not a master of deception like your daddy are you?Do you know if Hinkley's contract will include a succession plan with a formal handover to Carr?
Two year extension to Hinkley followed by a handover to Carr makes sense, especially when you remember the Collingwood succession plan was a two year extension to Malthouse followed by a handover to Buckley.
Really? Check the time and date of the post of mine you quoted.You're a very interesting case. Per your avatar, you're purportedly a Geelong supporter yet during a game against said opposition whilst needing the win, you're posting about Ken Hinkkey's contract status. You're not a master of deception like your daddy are you?
How does it make sense ? Hinkley has achieved nothing to justify an extension and is now burning our chances this year and has just given up a top 2 finish with 4 straight losses.Do you know if Hinkley's contract will include a succession plan with a formal handover to Carr?
Two year extension to Hinkley followed by a handover to Carr makes sense, especially when you remember the Collingwood succession plan was a two year extension to Malthouse followed by a handover to Buckley.
Port can still finish top 2 and I remember people writing off Sydney in 2012 when they lost three games in a row leading up to finals.How does it make sense ? Hinkley has achieved nothing to justify an extension and is now burning our chances this year and has just given up a top 2 finish with 4 straight losses.
The only thing that makes sense is telling him he has had his chances, over a decade but hasn't delivered so we are going to give someone else a chance.
Its all supposition on the forum, that is just my hunch/guess.Do you know if Hinkley's contract will include a succession plan with a formal handover to Carr?
Two year extension to Hinkley followed by a handover to Carr makes sense, especially when you remember the Collingwood succession plan was a two year extension to Malthouse followed by a handover to Buckley.
10 years as senior coach (of which in 5 years we didn't make finals) a 50/50 finals win/loss record and not a single grand final appearance, thats not a "Good Finals record".Port can still finish top 2 and I remember people writing off Sydney in 2012 when they lost three games in a row leading up to finals.
Finals are a different beast to home and away and Port have a good record in finals under Ken apart from that one horror showing against the Bulldogs in 2021.
2013 semi, 2014 preliminary, 2017 elimination and 2020 preliminary were all close games that could have gone the other way.
Not with our injuries now. Defense is gone .Port can still finish top 2 and I remember people writing off Sydney in 2012 when they lost three games in a row leading up to finals.
Finals are a different beast to home and away and Port have a good record in finals under Ken apart from that one horror showing against the Bulldogs in 2021.
2013 semi, 2014 preliminary, 2017 elimination and 2020 preliminary were all close games that could have gone the other way.
Maybe George is just an idiotScared to speak out Incase he's not welcome at the club,to think a magpies premiership player now thinks this way is pretty sad.
Imagine a club that was so vocal about accountability and being ruthless we letting and allowing a blow-in from Camperdown unwarranted free reign for over a decade
View attachment 1766220
Or maybe, just maybe its the board the keeps giving Hinkley un justified and premature extensions thats the problem.Maybe George is just an idiot
Obviously.Or maybe, just maybe its the board the keeps giving Hinkley un justified and premature extensions thats the problem.
Fair enough.Its all supposition on the forum, that is just my hunch/guess.
Hey has a good record in finals....Port can still finish top 2 and I remember people writing off Sydney in 2012 when they lost three games in a row leading up to finals.
Finals are a different beast to home and away and Port have a good record in finals under Ken apart from that one horror showing against the Bulldogs in 2021.
2013 semi, 2014 preliminary, 2017 elimination and 2020 preliminary were all close games that could have gone the other way.
Take the recommendation of chris davies whose role means he has a day to day job of assessing the football coaching department.Fair enough.
What would you prefer Port to do?
Sign Hinkley with a planned handover to Carr?
Sign Hinkley with no succession plan in place?
Or
Sack Hinkley and appoint Carr as coach?
What exactly qualifies a former state cricketer to assess a football coaching department and make recommendations to the board ?Take the recommendation of chris davies whose role means he has a day to day job of assessing the football coaching department.
Ken has a finals win percentage of 50% which is the same as John Longmire except Ken hasn't enjoyed the benefits of cola or academies.Hey has a good record in finals....
Uses a litany of finals he lost as evidence.
On SM-G975F using BigFooty.com mobile app