Oppo Camp The Hawthorn Racism Report

Remove this Banner Ad

View attachment 1514701View attachment 1514702

Put up a strong argument before he mentioned Simmo. Simmo’s comments were extremely poor but far from racist
If you really want to think about this properly then the interpretation of Simpson's comments as racist may in fact be racist in and of themselves. Are we suggesting that only minority groups can have split families or only white people can attend private school?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I imagine if anything, given we haven't heard of it before, they would have been happy to never speak of it again and just move on with their lives. It was the investigation carried out that dredged these stories up. They didn't go seeking publicity.

That argument falls flat on its face when the victims are anonymous and all identifying details removed from the publicly available reports.
 
The thread on the North board has taken a turn. It appears denial is not just a river in Egypt.

Last time I checked they wanted the investigation to play out but accepted mostly that there is no way Clarkson survives if the alleged events are even remotely true.

Have they now taken to shooting the messenger? Gillon has effectively confirmed the ABC report is spot on.
 
Last time I checked they wanted the investigation to play out but accepted mostly that there is no way Clarkson survives if the alleged events are even remotely true.

Have they now taken to shooting the messenger? Gillon has effectively confirmed the ABC report is spot on.
Clarkson is now going to be proved innocent and will lead them to glory. Some naming of names going on. A lot of optimism given the facts on hand.
 
That argument falls flat on its face when the victims are anonymous and all identifying details removed from the publicly available reports.
They were interviewed as part of the report on the condition of anonymity. That was part of the conditions of the report. To turn round and expose them now because it's blown up would breach that trust and be completely unethical.
 
Clarkson is now going to be proved innocent and will lead them to glory. Some naming of names going on. A lot of optimism given the facts on hand.

As expected so much of this story is beginning to unravel.

There’ll be a financial settlement reached between Hawthorn and the players out of good will. Although that doesn’t necessarily mean Hawthorn accepts the findings they would have wanted to be seen as doing the right thing. The report is flawed in that in only takes into account one side and that doesn’t stack up legally.

I think it’s guaranteed Clarko and Fagan will counter sue as their reputations have been tarnished. They are now known as racists by the general public. They have no choice but to seek legal action.
As they get their names cleared it will certainly be an unwanted distraction. They’ll name the ABC as one party but I’m wondering if they’ll go after the players too.

Double digit likes on this post, and counting. If I posted this with a link to the original post I'd probably be banned but this is one heck of a Kool Aid post.
 
Not a fan of the “open to review” just state we are going to review

“We review”, to me, means that is in-house and not as well received or credited as a genuine review.

“Open to review” means we open the doors and invite outside reviews therefore received by the community as legitimate.
 
Double digit likes on this post, and counting. If I posted this with a link to the original post I'd probably be banned but this is one heck of a Kool Aid post.


Even if you ignore how batshit crazy that is, and it is batshit crazy, I would love to know the last case the abc lost

Also no lawyer worth their salt would advise to sue the past players.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

“We review”, to me, means that is in-house and not as well received or credited as a genuine review.

“Open to review” means we open the doors and invite outside reviews therefore received by the community as legitimate.
Yeah agreed. Hopefully they haven’t just posted this because they know Simmo is cooked.

Or maybe they know he’s cooked, and are opening the door to allow for a convenient way to tear up his contract :sneaky::whistle::thumbsupv1:
 
Yeah agreed. Hopefully they haven’t just posted this because they know Simmo is cooked.

Or maybe they know he’s cooked, and are opening the door to allow for a convenient way to tear up his contract :sneaky::whistle::thumbsupv1:

Freo posted the same thing yesterday saying they are also open to review albeit not in an official club statement.

People have to stop jumping to conclusions here.
 
Agreed. We should just do a review anyway that we know all is good. The only hold up should be if the AFL wanted to do a league wide review in which case it wouldn't make a lot of sense to do our own when it can all be bundled up.

Agree that the scope of the Hawthorn report should be opened up as they, and the wider AFL should understand if the issue is race, power or both.

As for Simmo's comments, they were certainly ill-advised but far from racist. I imagine if we came across another potential Ben Cousins scenario we'd be steering clear, even if they attended a private school. I took Simmo's comments as being one of resourcing - give us better resources and we can afford to put more time and effort into talented kids who might need a little extra help and/or guidance.
 
Good and expected response from the Eagles - there won’t be a club in the league that isn’t open to review from external parties.

To say otherwise is basically admitting you’ve got something to hide….

I’d say every club - except Hawthorn and Collingwood - release similar statements by the end of the weekend.
 
Even if you ignore how batshit crazy that is, and it is batshit crazy, I would love to know the last case the abc lost

Also no lawyer worth their salt would advise to sue the past players.

The ABC settled a defamation case brought by Andrew Laming last year.

 

Apparently it took West Coast DAYS to comment. Not sure how that adds up if this all just happened on Wednesday, keeping in mind Thursday was a public holiday. How many other clubs have commented at this point, by my count only the three directly affected to know + Freo.
 

Apparently it took West Coast DAYS to comment. Not sure how that adds up if this all just happened on Wednesday, keeping in mind Thursday was a public holiday. How many other clubs have commented at this point, by my count only the three directly affected to know + Freo.

Someone’s salty about something

“It comes after days of The West Australian seeking answers from the Eagles and coach Adam Simpson, who was an assistant coach at the Hawks during the alleged racism. PerthNow is not suggesting the coach was involved in any alleged racism.”

We’re not suggesting anything but have been badgering the club “for days” seeking answers.

Answers to what?
 
“We review”, to me, means that is in-house and not as well received or credited as a genuine review.

“Open to review” means we open the doors and invite outside reviews therefore received by the community as legitimate.
It may have been better to say 'we look forward to participating in a league wide independent review, if one is implemented by the AFL. If not, the WCE intend to run an independent review of the club and treatment of indigenous players past and present'

AFL probably wouldn't like it though as it seems to put pressure back on them for a wide ranging review.


Let's be honest though, we aren't going to come out of a review squeaky clean. In recent times we've had Jetta and Cameron both leaving where maybe they shouldn't have. Ryan and Sampi with issues on the home front at stages. Plus there was a significant period of time there where we had 0 first nations players in our best 22.

No Idea about how the club handled all of these different scenarios, but I would be shocked if at least 1 wasn't done in a way that could have been handled better.

Hence the need for a review. We may be close to the Gold standard in the AFL (or not, who knows), but even if so we can always improve.

On SM-G986B using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
You gotta laugh. There’s no doubt we are going to do the open to review statement to look like the good corporate citizens we are since thats our number 1 objective but hell, this mob cant review the footy department, s and c, fitness or anything else in the organisation and get that correct…. What chances if they took this one it would somehow be correct.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Oppo Camp The Hawthorn Racism Report

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top