-
AFLW 2024 - Round 7 - Pride Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Those cheating Bombers!
- Thread starter emilsitka
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Gold
jameshird.com.au
- Mar 24, 2003
- 2,167
- 15
- Banned
- #5
mmmmmmmmm is it still April 1?
- May 9, 2002
- 16,147
- 126
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
- Other Teams
- North Adelaide Roosters
i h8 the effendon bombers - we smashed them on sat night & now the AFL gonna do the same thing
bring it on!
& now the AFL gonna do the same thingbring it on!
- Mar 24, 2003
- 2,167
- 15
- Banned
- #8
The best thing the AFL could ever do is strip clubs of Premierships. That would be a real deterrent. I wonder if Carlton would have cheated the salary cap with Greg Williams if they knew it meant that they would lose the 1995 flag from their possession. That would stop a lot of clubs very quickly.
you could be onto something here as i watched the news very carefully to see if i could spot this yrs april fools story and now that you mention it, the bombers story is the closest thing you could get especially with the footy mad victorians to latch onto.
damn
we can only hope its true.it was well set up cos the bloke doing the story is a reliable sauce for scoops
Lloyd and Hird have now both been implicated in the salary cap breaches. Other palyers are now being looked. It revolves around Essendon not logding external contracts with the AFL. Essendon are denying that they have done anything wrong and are threathening legal actionIt would appear that the breaches are worse than Carltons. Will the AFL and media go feral like they did against Carlton or quietly drop the matter like they did with Freo
LOL and people reckoned I was salary cap paranoid
The club has legal advice that they didn't have to lodge the external marketing contracts and the AFL says otherwise
Worse than Carlton HA HA HA HA HA HA
Storm in a teacup, Demetriou said f-all about it just Healy and Hookes jerking off
The club has legal advice that they didn't have to lodge the external marketing contracts and the AFL says otherwise
Worse than Carlton HA HA HA HA HA HA
Storm in a teacup, Demetriou said f-all about it just Healy and Hookes jerking off
cjwalkley
Premiership Player
www.markmcveigh.com.au would be worth about 2 coke wrappers!
Actually the real Mark McVeigh would probably only be worth about 3, maybe 4 at best!
Actually the real Mark McVeigh would probably only be worth about 3, maybe 4 at best!
JACKSON STATEMENT ON AFL DISCUSSIONS
Tuesday, 1 April 2003
Essendon Football Club chief executive Peter Jackson had the following comments to make with regards recent discussions the club has held with the AFL."Essendon Football Club has held discussions with the AFL with regards the internet rights it purchased from Matthew Lloyd and James Hird. This issue is in the process of being resolved but we are very comfortable that these were legitimate agreements between club and player," Jackson said.
"The club however has been most disappointed at the mischievous rumours circulating recently regarding other senior players at the club and alleged undisclosed payments made to them. We emphatically deny these rumours - they are completely without foundation.
"I am angered that the character of the staff responsible for overseeing the contracts of players at this club is continually being questioned because of unsubstantiated rumour."
"We will be officially requesting the AFL come and do a full audit of the club as soon as possible so we can put this continued rumour and innuendo to rest."
There we go.
I cannot see at all why anyone on the current board would even try any dodgy business as they did promise us members it would never happen again. If it did happen we'd be seeing riots at windy hill in no time.
Good to see that having 16 flags each isn't the only thing Essendon and Carlton have in common
If we have to once again lose draft picks for another breach i will spew blood and would want Mcmahons head on a stick.
Buying a url IS dodgy business.
The issue is whether what transpired did or didn't have AFL approval.
If it did, then I have no problem with whatever Essendon did.
But I would have a problem with the AFL for allowing what is blatently dodgy.
Essendon are cheats.
If the cheating went back to 2000 they should be stripped of their premiership cup. In 1993 the AFL was too gutless to do it and let them steal the flag, enough is enough. Lose the 2000 flag and strip the cheats of their draft picks for a decade!
If the cheating went back to 2000 they should be stripped of their premiership cup. In 1993 the AFL was too gutless to do it and let them steal the flag, enough is enough. Lose the 2000 flag and strip the cheats of their draft picks for a decade!
If that is true then I'm more than happy for Essendon to make the AFL look foolish.
If what Essendon implemented was a variation on what was approved, then Essendon would have been foolish and I think it's a murky can of worms which could end up in court.
I hope Essendon did exactly what the AFL approved and the issue then rightly dies. I'd rather good football stories now
What's up with the lloyd site anyway ?It's got weird script on it.
What's hirds url address
What's hirds url address
